Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 950 Download : 719

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The research was conducted to develop kinemaster animation video media using the four D development model to improve students' scientific literacy on magnetism. The aim of this study was the Kinemaster animated video media that tried out to 27 six-grade students of SDN Bulusidokare Sidoarjo with Control Group Pretest-Posttest Design. Data collection techniques were validation, observation, tests, and questionnaire. The analysis of research result revealed that the feasibility included: 1) valid, the media and instructional tools that were developed by the researchers were feasible to be experimented; 2) practical, the feasibility of learning went very well with the percentage of 88% to 100%, best practice that was found were students’ enthusiasm increased, the media could be played many times and able to motivate students in doing experiments. The obstacles that happened during the learning process were students’ readiness, insubstantial facilities and infrastructure, and nonoptimal online learning supervision; 3) effective, the science-literacy-test result of experimental-class students passed with N-gain 0,5 to 1,0. Whereas on the control-class, some students faced failure with N-gain 0,17 to 0,57. Data from N-gain results (%) both classes got normal and homogenous distribution, thus independent sample t-test was conducted with significance result 0,00 < 0,05. It can be affirmed that there was effectivity difference in improving science literacy on experimental-class and control-class. Good responses that students gave reached 89% to 100%. The conclusion of this study is Kinemaster animated video media was feasible and effective to be used in improving science literacy on primary school students.

Keywords

Learning Media Kinemaster Animation Video Science Literacy

Article Details

License

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Suryanti Suryanti, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Prof. Dr. Suryanti, M.Pd

Guru Besar Bidang Ilmu Pendidikan IPA di Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan

Nadi Suprapto, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Nadi Suprapto, Ph.D
How to Cite
Amrullah, A. R., Suryanti, S., & Suprapto, N. (2021). The Development of Kinemaster Animation Video as a Media to Improve Science Literacy in Elementary Schools. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.151-161
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adhiesta Kurnia Fikri Rosandi, Tjandrakirana, Imam Supardi. (2016) Pengembangan Multimedia IPA Berbasis Flash untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa SMP. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram Vol. 4, No 1: 34-40.
  2. Anita Amelia Ole, Sudin Simanjuntak dan Tumbel Ferny. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Sains Melalui Video Animasi Berbasis PBL (Problem Based Learning). Cogito Smart Journal, Vol. 5 No.1: 12-21.
  3. Anugrahana, Andri. (2020). Hambatan, Solusi dan Harapan: Pembelajaran Daring Selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Oleh Guru Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 10 No. 3: 282-289.
  4. Atika Deni, Murbangun Nuswowati dan Sri Nurhayati. (2018). Pengaruh Metode Discovery Learning Berbantuan Video Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, Vol 12, No. 2, 2018, halaman 2149 – 2158.
  5. Beheshti, M., Taspolat, A., Kaya, S.O. & Sapanca, F. H. (2018). Characteristics of instructional videos. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 10(1), 061-069.
  6. Burum, I., & Quinn, S. (2015). MOJO: The Mobile Journalism Handbook: How to Make Broadcast Videos with an iPhone or iPad. CRC Press.
  7. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., Hyun, H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
  8. Hajhashemi, K., Caltabiano, N., & Anderson, N. (2018). Multiple Intelligences, Motivations and Learning Experience Regarding Video-Assisted Subjects in a Rural University. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 167-182.
  9. Hake, R, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/ Gains Scores. AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision. D, Measurement and Research Methodology.
  10. Handoko, Arif. (2021). Pemanfaatan Kinemaster sebagai Aplikasi Pembuatan Iklan Video Bagi Pengelola dan Pendidik PKBM. Jurnal Desain: Kajian Bidang Penelitian Desain Vol. 1 No. 1, Hal. 14 – 24.
  11. Heinich, R., et. al. (2002). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
  12. Imamah, N., (2012). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Ipa Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbasis Konstruktivisme Dipadukan Dengan Video Animasi Materi Sistem Kehidupan Tumbuhan. JPII 1 (1) (2012) 32-36.
  13. Kay Swartzwelder, Jackie Murphy, Glenn Murphy. (2019). The Impact Of Text-Based And Video Discussions On Student Engagement And Interactivity In An Online Course. Journal of Educators Online, v16 n1.
  14. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Konsep Literasi dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.
  15. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  16. Martin, Alyssa. (2020). COVID Notes from the Field: Transitioning to Digital Learning. Georgia Educational Researcher: Vol. 17 : Iss. 2 , Article 7.
  17. Mustaji. (2013). Media Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
  18. Nieveen, Nienke and Plomp, Tjeerd. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Netzodruk: Enschede.
  19. Niswatuzzahro Vivi, Fina Fakhriyah, Ratri Rahayu. (2018). Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Berbantuan Media Audio Visual Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas 5 SD. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 8 No. 3, September 2018: 273-284.
  20. Norma Juniati, A.Wahab Jufri dan Muhammad Yamin. (2020). Penggunaan Multimedia Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. J. Pijar MIPA, Vol. 15 No.4: 315-319, DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v15i4.1975.
  21. OECD. (2019). Indonesia - Country Note - PISA 2018 Results. PISA team Directorate for Education and Skills
  22. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
  23. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results COMBINED EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES VOLUME I, II & III. PISA.
  24. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2015.
  25. Permendikbud No.22 tahun 2016
  26. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive Development in Children: Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
  27. Ratumanan dan Laurens. (2011). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar pada Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Edisi 2. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
  28. Riduwan. (2012). Dasar-dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  29. Sadiman, Arief S. Rahardjo, R. Haryono, Anung & Rahardjito. (2014). Media Pendidikan Pengertian, Pengembangan, dan Pemanfaatannya. Jakarta Raja Grafindo Persada.
  30. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
  31. Suryanti, S., Mariana, N., Yermiandhoko, Y., & Widodo, W. (2020). Local wisdom-based teaching material for enhancing primary students’ scientific literacy skill. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(1), 96-105.
  32. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teacher of Expectional Children. Minncapolis, Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute/ Special Education, University of Minnesota.
  33. Toharudin, Uus., Hendrawati, Sri & Rustaman, H. Andrian. (2011). Membangun Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Bandung: Humaniora.
  34. Zuraidah, Siti Md Osman; Rozinah Jamaludin; Nor Fathimah Fathil. (2016). An Analysis Of Using Online Video Lecture On Learning Outcome: The Mediating Role Of Student Interaction And Student Engagement. Journal Of Education And Elearning Research, 3(2): 57-64.