Main Article Content

Abstract

Self-efficacy is one of student’s success predictors, so it should be one of the variables to be considered in learning activities. Research on self-efficacy in pesantren (Islamic boarding school) has not been widely disclosed. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct research related to gender-based self-efficacy in pesantren. The study used an ex-post-facto non-experimental quantitative design at one of the pesantren-based SMP and MTs in Pamekasan. There are 29 males and 39 females as the participants of this study. SOSESC-P was used as research instrument. Data were analyzed using t-test. Based on the result, there is no significant difference between the self-efficacy of male and female students in pesantren, with average score of 64.12 and 64.86 respectively. This indicates that the science learning process in pesantren has succeeded in bridging the achievement of self-efficacy of male and female students, with their comprehensive learning concept in 3 dimensions, namely (1) the deep dimension of religious morality, (2) the dimensions of science and technology, and (3) dimensions of skills needed in the 21st century. The result of this study can be used as evidence in policy-making, related to science learning and self-efficacy based on gender.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Lailatul Fitria, Department of science education, Faculty of Education, University of Trunojoyo Madura

Department of science education

Maria Chandra Sutarja, University of Trunojoyo Madura

Department of Science Education

Badrud Tamam, University of Trunojoyo Madura

Department of Science Education
How to Cite
Fitria, L., Sutarja, M. C., & Tamam, B. (2022). Self-efficacy Siswa Pesantren pada Mata Pelajaran IPA serta kaitannya dengan Gender. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 817–821. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.3.817-821

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
  3. Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 2, 296–316. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296.
  4. Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2010). Toward a theory of learner-centered training design: an integrated framework of active learning’, in S. W. J. Kozlowski and E. Salas (eds), Learning Training, and Development in Organizations. New York: Routledge, pp. 263–302.
  5. Busch, T. (1995). Gender Differences in Self‐efficacy and Academic Performance among Students of Business Administration. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 311–318. doi:10.1080/0031383950390403
  6. DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245- 255.
  7. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
  8. Gor, P. O., , Othuon, L. O. A., & Migunde, Q. A. (2020). Gender Difference in the Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Performance in Science among Secondary School Students in Migori County, Kenya, Education, Society and Human Studies, 1(2), 154-170.
  9. Hakim, T. (2004). Mengatasi rasa tidak percaya diri. Jakarta: Puspa Swara
  10. Kennedy, H. L. (1996). Science learning: A self-efficacy study in higher education. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57 (7A), 2856.
  11. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. (2003). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure 47(4):162– 169
  12. Nizar, S. (2013). Sejarah Sosial dan Dinamika Intelektual. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
  13. Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Developing learners (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  14. Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M.-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.004
  15. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). New York, NY: Routledge
  16. Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  17. Seitfert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation: Educational Research, vol.46, no. 2, 137-149
  18. Syed, M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Chemers, M. M., Goza, B. K., Bearman, S., Crosby, F. J., Shaw, J. M., & Hunter, L. (2019). The role of self-efficacy and identity in mediating the effects of STEM support experiences. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 19(1), 7-49. doi: 10.1111/asap.12170
  19. Usher, E. L. (2009). Sources of middle school students’ self-efficacy in mathematics: A qualitative investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 275-314. doi: 10.3102/0002831208324517
  20. Wassell, J., Rogers, S. L., Felmingam, K. L., Bryant, R. A., & Pearson, J. (2015). Sex hormones predict the sensory strength and vividness of mental imagery. Biological Psychology, 107, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.02.003
  21. Williams, T., & Williams, K. (2010). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 453–466
  22. Zaidi, Z. F. (2010). Gender differences in human brain: A review. The Open Anatomy Journal, 2, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.2174/1877609401002010037.