Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper examines research in using Web Based Inquiry Learning (WBIL) as an alternative to online inquiry learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. WBIL was built to assist junior high school students in understanding everyday science phenomena with a guided inquiry framework and various scaffolding sources. In addition, it aims to support teachers in designing their virtual inquiry classrooms for the new normal learning era. Learning using Web Based Inquiry Learning is effective in increasing students' inquiry abilities on environmental pollution material in the context of ESD (Educational Sustainable Development) which is marked by the results of the pretest and posttest data t-test calculations, obtained sig. 0.000 (0.000 < 0.05). While the results of the LKS analysis that students have done on the web with the average score on each indicator is 83.2% with a high interpretation. WBIL in environmental pollution is also effective in increasing students' environmental awareness, which is indicated by the average percentage of all indicators, there is an increase in the percentage from 74.5% to 79.0%.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamdi, N., Rochintaniawati, D., & Prima, E. C. (2022). Efektivitas Web Based Inquiry Learning pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan dalam Konteks Education Sustainable Development untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berinkuiri dan Kepedulian Lingkungan Siswa . PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 733–738. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.3.733-738

References

  1. Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID- 19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 1.
  2. Almuntasheri, S. S., Gillies, R., & Wright, T. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Guided Inquiry-Based, Teachers' Professional Development Programme on Saudi Students' Understanding of Density. Science Education International, 16-39.
  3. Chang, C.-J., Liu, C.-C., Wen, C.-T., Tseng, L.-W., Chang, H.-Y., Chang, M.-H., Yang, C.-W. (2020). The impact of light-weight inquiry with computer simulations on science learning in classrooms. Computers & Education, 1-27.
  4. Daryanto dan Suryatri, Darmiatun. 2013. Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah. Yogyakarta : Gava Media.
  5. Davies, R. S. (2011). Understanding technology literacy: A framework for evaluating educational technology integration. TechTrends, 55(5), 45.
  6. Dlouhá, J., Burandt, S., 2015. Design and Evaluation of Learning Processes in an International Sustainability Oriented Study Programme. In search of a new educational quality and assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 247-258.
  7. Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanisab, M., & Oersa, B. v. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 194-214.
  8. Dorn, E., Hancock, B., Sarakatsannis, J., and Viruleg. E. (2021). COVID-19 and Education : The Lingering Effects of Unfinished Learning. New York : McKinsey & Company.
  9. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (2011). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences , 391-450.
  10. Ekantini, A. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 : Studi Komparasi Pembelajaran Luring dan Daring pada Mata Pelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah. Volume 5, Nomor 2.
  11. Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The Struggle of Indonesian Students in the Context of Timss and Pisa has not Ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 393-406.
  12. Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers Inhibiting Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Potential Solutions: Perceptions of Positively Inclined Early Adopters. Research in Science Education , 543–566.
  13. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 166–183.
  14. G, N., Lederman, S, J., Lederman, & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of
  15. Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 138-147.
  16. Goldschmidt, K. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Technology use to support the wellbeing of children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing.
  17. Hansen, J. W. (2003). To change perceptions of technology programs. Journal of Technology Studies, 29(2), 16–19.
  18. Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2012). Guided Inquiry Design: A Framework for Inquiry in Your School. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
  19. Kurniawan, A. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Cmaptools Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Dan Mempertahankan Retensi Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan , 17-26.
  20. Kyza, E. A. (2015). Online Inquiry Environments. In: Gunstone R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Science Education. London: Springer Dordrecht.
  21. Lee, E. A., & Brown, M. J. (2018). Connecting Inquiry and Values in Science Education: An Approach Based on John Dewey's Philosophy. Science & Education, 63-79.
  22. McNew-Birren, J., & Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74-87.
  23. Megawati. 2018. Pentingnya Pengakomodasian Pengalaman Belajar pada Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Tunas Pendidikan. 1 (1), 21-30.
  24. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: D.C.: National Academy Press.
  25. Ngertini, N.N., Sadia, I.W. & Yudana, I.M. (2013). Pengaruh Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap KemampuanPemahaman Konsep dan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas X SMA PGRI 1 Amlapura. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 4 (1).
  26. Pifarré, M., & Argelagós, E. (2008). Inquiry Web-Based Learning to Enhance Information Problem Solving Competence in Science. In J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, D. T. Seufert, & D. L. Kester, Beyond Knowledge: The Legacy of Competence "Meaningful Computer-based Learning Environments" (pp. 153-162). Austria: Springer.
  27. Pusat Badan Kebijakan. 2010. Pendidikan untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Komisi Nasional Indonesia untuk UNESCO Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 2014.
  28. Raes, A., & Schellens, T. (2015). Unraveling the motivational effects and challenges of web-based collaborative inquiry learning across different groups of learners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 405-430.
  29. Rieckmann, M. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals : Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
  30. Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018; Insight and Interpretations. Paris: Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  31. Simbolon, D. H., & Sahyar. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Eksperimen Riil dan Laboratorium Virtual terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 299-316.
  32. Spiro, M. D., & Knisely, K. L. (2008 ). Alternation of Generations and Experimental Design: A Guided-Inquiry Lab Exploring the Nature of the her1 Developmental Mutant of Ceratopteris richardii (C-Fern). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 82-88.
  33. Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2015). Implementation of 5E Inquiry Incorporated with Analogy Learning Approach to Enhance Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Reaction Rate for Grade 11 Students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00190G
  34. Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for Sustainable Development: An Expert Review of Processes and Learning. Paris: UNESCO. Available in Spanish, French and English.ED-2010/WS/46.
  35. WHO. (2020). Health Topics. Coronavírus. Coronavirus: Symptoms. World Health Organization, 2020a. Disponível Em: Https://Www. Who. Int/Healthtopics/Coronavirus# Tab= Tab_3. Acesso Em, 7.
  36. Williams, P. J., Nguyen, N., & Mangan, J. (2017). Using Technology To Support Science Inquiry Learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 26-57.
  37. Wirawan, I. M., Sunarya, I. M., Jayendra, I. G., & Yudianto, A. (2018). Mobile Learning Based-On Guided Inquiry: Optimization Of Students’ Motivation. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 256-261.
  38. Yang, X., Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q., & Hong, J.-C. (2020). The Effects of Scientific Self-efficacy and Cognitive Anxiety on Science Engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” Model during School Disruption in COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-28.
  39. Yaumi, Muhammad, 2014. Pendidikan Karakter Landasan Pilar dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group