Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 507 Download : 508

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the profile of students' oral argumentation skills based on Socioscientific Issues in the Microbiology course. This type of research is a descriptive study in order to obtain an overview of the quality of oral arguments of sixth semester students. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, totaling 37 students of science class 2017. The instruments used were audio recordings and anecdotal notes. The assessment of the quality of students' oral arguments is based on the Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern (TAP) pattern which consists of claim, data, warrant, backing, and rebuttal elements. The results showed that science students had the quality of oral argumentation which was still at level 1 where student arguments only consist of simple claims with opposing claims obtaining a percentage of 12%,, level 2 had a percentage rate of 88% while level 3%, level 4% and level 5% of 0% means scientific argumentation ability science students are still relatively low. This finding will be the basis for researchers to evaluate the learning program that has been applied in the Microbiology course and become the basis for further research related to learning strategies in improving the oral argumentation skills of prospective science teachers.

Keywords

Oral argumentation; Socioscientific Issues; Microbiology; Toulmin's Argumentation Pattern

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Annisa Novianti Taufik, Liska Berlian, Atep Iman, Risa Tarisa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Taufik, A. N., Berlian, L., Iman, A., & Tarisa, R. (2023). Profil Kemampuan Argumentasi Lisan Berbasis Socioscientific Issues Mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA pada Mata Kuliah Mikrobiologi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 832–838. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.3.832-838
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad, M. (2019). Keterampilan berargumentasi peserta didik secara tertulis pada pembelajaran protista menggunakan pendekatan saintifik dan problem based learning. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
  2. Andryani, F., Djafar, H., & Qaddafi, M. (2016). Penerapan pendekatan SSI (Socio-Scientifict Issues) dengan menggunakan media power point terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis pada mahasiswa baru angkatan 2015 Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makass. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 64–66.
  3. Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A 3-year intervention study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725187
  4. Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324
  5. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012.
  6. Eskin, H., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2013). Argumentation as a Strategy For Conceptual Learning of Dynamics. Research in Science Education, 43 (5), 1939-1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5.
  7. Faiqoh, N., Khasanah, N., Astuti, L. P., Prayitno, R., & Prayitno, B. A. (2018). Profil keterampilan argumentasi siswa kelas X dan XI MIPA di SMA Batik 1 Surakarta
  8. pada materi keanekaragaman hayati. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(3), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpb.v7i3.10122
  9. Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., & Saptono, S. (2021). Mengembangkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah calon guru sekolah dasar sebagai bentuk penguatan keterampilan abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang, 190–195. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/847
  10. Farida, I. (2015). Profil keterampilan argumentasi siswa pada konsep koloid yang dikembangkan melalui pembelajaran inkuiri argumentatif. Edusains, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i1.1098
  11. Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559
  12. Herlanti, Y. (2014). Analisis argumentasi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada isu sosiosainfik konsumsi genetically Modified Organism (GMO). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2901
  13. Konstantinidou, A., & Macagno, F. (2013). Understanding students’ reasoning : Argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education. Science and Education, 22(5), 1069–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9564-3
  14. Mazfufah, N. F. (2017). Pengaruh metode diskusi isu-isu sosiosaintifik terhadap kemampuan penalaran ilmiah peserta didik [Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta].
  15. Ogan-Bekiroglu, f., & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the Relationship Between Engagement in Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1415-1443. DOI: 10.1007/210763-012-9346-z.
  16. Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., Harlita, Indrowati, M., & Sajidan. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi FKIP UNS pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880
  17. Rahayu, S. (2019). Konsep socioscientific issues : Manfaatnya dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep sains, Nature of Science (NOS) dan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA UNESA, 1–14.
  18. Rahman, D.F. (2018). Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Socioscientific Siswa SMP. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 1 (1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i1.3868
  19. Suartha, I. N., Setiawn, I. G. A. N., & Sudiatmika, A. A. R. (2020). Pola argumen Toulmin pada proses pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(April), 1–11.
  20. Subiantoro, A. W., Ariyanti, N. A., & Sulistyo. (2013). Pembelajaran materi ekosistem dengan socio-scientific issues dan pengaruhnya terhadap reflective judgment siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v2i1.2508.
  21. Sudarmo, N. A., Lesmono, A.D., & Harijanto, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMA Pada Konsep Termodinamika. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7 (2), 196-201.
  22. Wagner, T. (2014). The global achievement gap. Assessment, 20–21. http://www.carrollcountyunited.org/files/THE_GLOBAL_ACHIEVEMENT_GAP_notes.doc
  23. Wardani, A.D., Yuliati, L., Taufiq, A. (2018). Kualitas Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Pada Materi Hukum Newton. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3 (10), 1364-1372. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/.
  24. Widhi, M. T. W., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada model pembelajaran berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) dalam memahami konsep fisika dengan metode library research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.79-91