Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 361 Download : 564

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine the diversity of phenotypes and the status of environmental carrying capacity in local chicken cultivation in Merawang District, Bangka Regency. This research was conducted in 5 villages in Merawang District which have many local chicken coops. The sampling method used is purposive sampling. Data analysis was carried out by gender. The parameters observed in this study were phenotype observations in the form of qualitative characteristics (feather color, feather pattern, feather pattern, feather flickering, shark color and comb type) and quantitative traits (chicken body weight, chicken, chicken breast circumference, length of femur, shank length and environmental parameters). The results obtained were 164 local chickens. The chickens obtained consisted of 108 female chickens and 56 male chickens. The results showed the dominant comb shape was rose (male) and pea (female), feather color was white (male) and colored (female), yellow shank color, feather pattern for both males. and dominantly striated females. The dominant feather pattern is Colombia, while the flickering feathers are dominant for both local and female chickens. The results showed that the body weight of local chickens in five villages, Merawang District had an average of 12.6 ± 9.33 kg (male) and 192.4 ± 2.87 kg (female). Based on body size data, values in millimeters (mm) were obtained for males and females, such as body length 1.734 ± 51.53 and 3.091 ± 104.13; shank lengths 306.6±9.78 and 551.8±18.16; thigh (femur) length 749±28.53 and 1,403±46.74; calf length (tibia) 702±17.60 and 1,228±38.29; and shank circumferences 63.6 ±1.16 and 121±3.77. The average temperature of the cage during observation was 28ºC with feed given an average of three times a day, namely in the morning, afternoon and evening. Environmental factors such as housing and temperature become the carrying capacity of local chicken cultivation in Bangka.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Riko Irwanto, Marinah, Shalsabilla Rizqi Aulia Awanni, Tissya Milly Gusnia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Irwanto, R., Marinah, Shalsabilla Rizqi Aulia Awanni, & Tissya Milly Gusnia. (2023). Keanekaragaman Fenotipe dan Daya Dukung Lingkungan pada Ayam Lokal di Kecamatan Merawang Kabupaten Bangka. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.2.158-167
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amlia, M. Amrullah. P. dan R. Aka. (2016). Studi Karakteristik Sifat Kuantitatif dan Sifat Kualitatif di Kecamatan Lasalimu Kabupaten Buton. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis, 3(1). 31-39.
  2. Baharuddin., Kabo P.,Suwandi, D. (2013). Perbandingan Efektivitas dan Efek Samping Obat Anti Hipertensi Terhadap Penuruna Tekanan Darah Pasien Hipertensi. Makasar:Universitas Hasanudin
  3. Bidura I. G. N. G. & I. M. Suasta. (2006). Penampilan Ayam Kampong Umur 0-8 Minggu Yang Diberi Tepung Hipofisa Kambing Melalui Ransum. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan, 9(1), 20- 24.
  4. Brumbaugh, J. A. & J. W. Moore. (1968). The Effects of E Allels Upon Melanocytes Differentiation. In: Crawford. R. D. (Ed). Poultry Breeding and Genetics. Departement of Animal and Poultry Science. University of Saskatchewen, Saskatoon.
  5. Caglayan T, Kirikci, A. Gunlu & Alasahan S. (2011). Some body measurements and their correlations with live weight in the rock partridge (Alectoris gaeca). African Journal of Agicultural Research. 6(7), 1857-1861.
  6. Dako, S.(2013). Kelenturan Fenotipik SifatSifat Produksi Dan Reproduksi Burung Puyuh Yang Di Beri Kadar Garam Berbeda Dalam Air Minum. Tesis. Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Manado.
  7. Dewanti R. (2014). Pengaruh bobot dan frekuensi pemutaran telur terhadap fertilitas, daya tetas dan bobot tetas itik lokal. Buletin Peternakan, 38(1), 16
  8. Edowai E, Tumbal Estepanus LS & Maker FM. (2019). Penampilan Sifat Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif Ayam Kampung Di Distrik Nabire Kabupaten Nabire. Jurnal Fapertanak, 4(1), 50-5.
  9. Egena S.S.A, Ijaiya A.T, Ogah D.M & Aya V.E .(2014). Principal component analysis of body measurements in a population of indigenous Nigerian chickens raised under extensive management system. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 47(2): 77-82.
  10. Ensminger MA. (1992). Poultry Science (Animal Agriculture Series).3th Edition. Interstate Publisher, Inc. Danville, Illinois.
  11. Goto, T., Mori, H., Shiota, S., Tomonaga, S. (2019). Metabolomics approach reveals the effects of breed and feed on the composition of chicken eggs. Metab., 9(224), 1-12.
  12. Jull M.A. (1951). Poultry Husbandry. 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill publishing CO. Ltd: New Delhi.
  13. Kilic, I., Simsek, E. (2013). The effects of heat stress on egg production and quality of laying hens. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 12(1), 42- 47
  14. Kurnianto E. (2010). Ilmu Pemuliaan Ternak. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.
  15. Kusuma D & N S Prijono. (2007). Keanekaragaman Sumber Daya Hayati Ayam Lokal Indonesia : Manfaat dan Potensi. Jakarta: LIPI Press.
  16. Lestari, S. Prasetyo dan N. K. D. Haryani. (2013). Mengangkat Potensi Genetik dan Produktivitas Ayam Kampung yang Memiliki Gen NA di Pulau Lombok. Laporan Penelitian. Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Mataram. Mataram.
  17. Milas E.S.S, Saerang J.L.P, Lambey LJ & Takaendeng BJ. (2020). Karakteristik Fenotipe Beberapa Sifat Kuantitatif Ayam Kampung Di Minahasa. Zootec. 40(2), 603-614.
  18. Mulyono, R. H, S. T., N. RR. Darmono. (2009). A. Study of MorphometricPhenotipic Characteristicof Indonesian Chicken: Kampung, Sentul dan Wareng-Rtangerang, Based of Discriminant Analysis, Wald-Anderson Criteria And Mahalanobis Minimum Distance. Prosiding The IstInternasional Seminar on Animal Industry 2009. Faculty Of Animal Science, Bogor Agicultural University. Bogor.
  19. Nataamijaya A. G. (2010). Pengembangan Potensi Ayam Lokal untuk Menunjang Pengingkatan Kesejahteraan Petani. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian,29 (4).
  20. Nataamijaya A.G. (2005). Karakteristik penam-pilan pola warna bulu, kulit, sisik kaki, danparuh pada ayam pelung di Garut dan ayamsentul di Ciamis. Bul. Plasma Nutfah, 11(1):1-5.
  21. Noor, R. R. (2008). Genetika Ternak. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
  22. Pagala M A, A M Tasse & N. Ulupi. 2015. Association of cGH EcoRV Gene with Production in Tolaki Chicken. IJSBAR, 24(7):88-95.
  23. Parakkasi A. (1978). Ilmu Gizi dan Makanan Ternak Monogastrik. Bandung: Angkasa.
  24. Pramudyati, Y. S. (2009). Petunjuk Teknis Beternak Ayam Buras. GTZ Merang Reed Pilot Project Beker jasama Dengan Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian (BPTP) Sumatera Selatan.
  25. Rahmat, Y., E. Wantasen, A. H. S. Salendu, P. O. V. Waleleng. (2020). Analisis pendapatan peternakan ayam buras yang dipelihara secara extensif di Kecamatan Dimembe. Zootec, 40(1),160-171.
  26. Rasyaf. (2011). Panduan Beternak Ayam Pedaging. Edisi Ke-15. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
  27. Resnawati, H., A.G. Nataamijaya, U. Kusnadi, H. Hamid, S.Iskandar, dan Sugiono. (2000). Optimalisasi teknologi budidaya ternak ayam lokal penghasil daging dan telur. hlm. 172-176. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peternakan dan Veteriner, Cisarua, Bogor, 18-19 September 2000. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan, Bogor
  28. Rusdin, M. (2007). Analisis Fenotipe Genotipe dan Suara Ayam Pelung di Kabupaten Cianjur. Tesis. Progam Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor
  29. Sadarman., Elfawati dan Sadriadi. (2013). Studi frekuensi sifat kualitatif ayam kampung di Desa Menaming Kecamatan Rambah Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Provinsi Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peternakan dan Veteriner. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan. Bogor
  30. Salahi A, Khabisi M.M & Anissian A. (2014). Effects of infectious bursal disease (IBD) on shank length and diameter, body weight and mortality in broiler breeder at rearing period. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 38(1), 34-39.
  31. Saleh, P. dan Budiman. (2020). Pengaruh Penambahan Bahan Pengikat Terhadap Karakteristik Nugget Dari Ikan Patin (Pangasium hypothalamus). Skripsi Program Studi Teknologi Hasil Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
  32. Sari, O., Bambang, P., Nur, R.U. (2017). Suhu, kelembaban, serta produksi telur itik pada kandang tipe litter dan slat. Unnes. J. Life Sci, 1(2), 94-100.
  33. Sartika T, Sulandari S, Zein MSA, Paryanti S. (2008). Karakter Fenotipee Genetic Eksternal Ayam Lokal Indonesia. Laporan Akhir Penelitian Kompetitif Riset Karakterisasi molekuler–LIPI. 16 hlm.
  34. Sayuti, R. (2002). “Prospek Pengembangan Agribisnis Ayam Buras Sebagai Usaha Ekonomi Di Pedesaan”. FAE, 20(1).
  35. Scanes, C. G., G. Brant & M. E. Ensiminger. (2004). Poultry Science. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey.
  36. Semakula J, Lusembo P, Kugonza D.R, Mutetikka D, Ssennyonjo J & Mwesigwa M. (2011). Estimation of live body weight using Zoometrical Measurements for improved marketing of indigenous chicken in the lake victoria basin of Uganda. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 23(8).
  37. Setiawati, T., Afnan, R., Ulupi, N. (2016). Performa produksi dan kualitas telur ayam petelur pada sistem litter dan cage dengan suhu kandang berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan, 4(1), 197- 203.
  38. Smyth, I. A. (1990). Collective Efficiency and Selective Benefits: The growth of the Rattan Industri of TegalWangi (Indonesia)’. Working Paper B-11. Bandung: ISS West Java Rural Nonfarm Sector Research Project.
  39. Soeparno. (1998). Ilmu dan Teknologi Daging. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Madha University Press.
  40. Sulandari S, M.S.A. Zein, S. Paryanti & T.Sartika. (2007). Taksonomi dan asal-usul ayam domestikasi.hlm 525. Dalam K. Diwyanto dan S.N. Prijono (Ed.). Keanekaragaman Sumber Daya Hayati Ayam Lokal Indonesia:Manfaat dan Potensi. Bogor: LIPI.
  41. Supranto J. (1990). Statistik Teori dan Aplikasi Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  42. Suprijatna, E., A. Umiyati, dan K. Ruhyat. (2005). Ilmu Dasar Ternak Unggas. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.
  43. Suryo. (2012). Genetika. Gadjah Mada University Press.Yogyakarta.
  44. Susanti, T., S. Iskandar dan S. Sopiyana. (2006). Karakteristik Kualitatif dan UkuranUkuran Tubuh Ayam Wareng Tangerang. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. 680-686.
  45. Syakir A. (2018). Identifikasi Karakteristik Sifat Kualitatif Ayam Gaga Di Kabupaten Sidrap Sulawesi Selatan. [SKRIPSI]. Makassar: Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Hasanuddin.
  46. Tantu R. Y. (2007). Fenotipe dan Genotip Ayam Hutan Merah (Gallus gallus) Dan Ayam Kampung (Gallus domesticus) di Watutela dan Ngatabaru Sulawesi Tengah. [Tesis]. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  47. Warwick, E.J., J. M. Astuti dan W. Hardjosubroto. (1995). PemuliaanTernak. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  48. Yatim, W. (1991). Genetika, Edisi IV. Tarsito, Bandung.
  49. Yousef, M.K. (1985). Thermoneutral Zone. In: M.K. Yousef (Ed.). Stress Physiology of Livestock. Vol.II. CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida. P.68-69.