Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 304 Download : 281

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The aims of this research were to obtain the eligibility of the POGIL e-worksheet to improve students' critical thinking skills on reaction rate material in terms of validity, practicality, and effectiveness criteria. The type of research was research and development using the ADDIE development model with three stages, Analyze, Design, and Development. The research was obtain validity from the validation sheet in terms of the eligibility of content, presentation, language, and design getting mode ≥ 3 so it was declared valid. Practicality was obtained from a response questionnaire supported by a student activity observation sheet. Overall practicality of the response questionnaire has 89.09% (very practical), while the learner activity observation sheet getting mode = 1. Effectiveness was obtained from the pretest and posttest of critical thinking skills supported by student learning results. The result of the critical thinking skills test got N-gain, 0.929 Interpretation, 0.722 Analysis, 0.694 Evaluation, 0.556 Inference, and 0.933 Explanation and obtained a significance value of 0 in the paired sample t-test so it was concluded there was an increase in students' critical thinking skills in reaction rate material after using POGIL e-worksheet. The learning outcomes test data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test has 0 probability value, then it can be concluded there is an increase in student learning outcomes in reaction rate material after using the POGIL e-worksheet. Based on the results of validity, practicality, and effectiveness, the development of the POGIL e-worksheet is feasible.

Keywords

POGIL e-worksheet students' critical thinking skills reaction rate

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Bella Wahyuning Tyas, Dian Novita

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tyas, B. W., & Novita, D. (2023). POGIL (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) e-Worksheet to Improve Critical Thinking Skills on Reaction Rate Material. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.2.224-231
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afni, A. N., & Suyono, S. (2021). Kelayakan Lembar Penugasan Terstruktur pada Materi Laju Reaksi untuk Melatihkan Literasi Sains. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.16-25
  2. Amalia, E. R., & Novita, D. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan HOTS Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v5i1.3264
  3. Andriani, M., Muhali, M., & Dewi, C. A. (2019). Pengembangan modul kimia berbasis kontekstual untuk membangun pemahaman konsep siswa pada materi asam basa. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 1(7), 25–36.
  4. Anggraini, R., Wahyuni, S., & Lesmono, A. D. (2016). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (Lks) Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Di Sman 4 Jember 1). Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(4), 350–356.
  5. Asri, A. S. T., & Dwiningsih, K. (2022). Validitas E-Modul Interaktif sebagai Media Pembelajaran untuk Melatih Kecerdasan Visual Spasial pada Materi Ikatan Kovalen. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.465-473
  6. Astuji, P., Purwoko, P., & Indaryanti, I. (2017). Pengembangan LKS untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika di Kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Gantang, 2(2), 145–155.
  7. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. In Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology University of Georgia (Vol. 53, Issue 9). Springer.
  8. Carneiro, R., & Draxler, A. (2008). Education for the 21st century: Lessons and challenges. European Journal of Education, 43(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2008.00348.x
  9. Cholifah, S. N., & Novita, D. (2022). Pengembangan E-LKPD Guided Inquiry-Liveworksheet untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains pada Submateri Faktor Laju Reaksi. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v5i1.3280
  10. Facione, F. A. (2013). Critical Thinking for Life: Valuing, Measuring, and Training Critical Thinking in All Its Forms. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 28(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct20132812
  11. Hake, R. . (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Measurement and Reasearch Methodology.
  12. Hanson, D. M. (2005). Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities (2nd ed.). Pascific Crest. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238073200
  13. Kisworo, B., & Gusman, T. A. (2019). Process oriented guided inquiry learning to increase student’s critical thinking ability on chemistry learning at Islamic High School in Cirebon. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194(020050). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139782
  14. Laksono, M. B. T., & Novita, D. (2022). Implementasi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Online Dengan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Elektronik (E-Lkpd) Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Materi Faktor Laju Reaksi. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 14(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.35457/konstruk.v14i1.1966
  15. Lutfi, A. (2021). Research an Development (R&D) : Implikasi dalam pendidikan kimia. In Nucl. Phys. Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Uneversitas Negeri Surabaya.
  16. Petrucci, R. H. (2011). General Chemistry - Principles and Modern Applications 10’th Edition (Vol. 2005). Pearson Canada Inc.
  17. Putri, A. A., & Qosyim, A. (2021). Validitas perangkat pembelajaran saintifik 5M untuk meningkatkan keterampilan kolaborasi dan hasil belajar siswa SMP pada materi sistem pernapasan. Pensa E-Jurnal: Pendidikan Sains, 9(1), 7–16. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/38484
  18. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  19. Ulya, I., & Rusmini, R. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.3.695-703
  20. Wahab, A., Junaedi, J., & Azhar, M. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Statistika Pendidikan Menggunakan Uji Peningkatan N-Gain di PGMI. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.845
  21. Wijiastuti, D. S., & Muchlis. (2021). Implementation of POGIL Model nn Rate of Reaction Topic to Train Students Critical Thinking Skills. In UNESA Journal of Chemical Education (Vol. 10, Issue 01).
  22. Yahya, S. F., & Lutfi, A. (2023). Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Articulate Storyline untuk Melatih Kecerdasan Visual pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. 7(1), 106–116.
  23. Yuliana, V., Copriady, J., & Erna, M. (2023). Pengembangan E-Modul Kimia Interaktif Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik Menggunakan Liveworksheets pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v17i1.32932
  24. Zulkarnain, Z. Y. A. S. H. (2019). Improving students ’ critical thinking learning in chemistry learning using. J. Pijar MIPA, 14(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v14i2.1321