Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 271 Download : 273

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The basis of the research was that misconceptions greatly affect student learning outcomes because they can understand and interpret a concept incorrectly. Students who have understood the concept can be measured from good learning outcomes. Low learning outcomes identify difficulties in the student learning process, thereby affecting the level of student understanding. The research conducted was descriptive research. The facts found from the research results were then described in accordance with the actual situation in the form of data. The data obtained was then processed, interpreted, recorded and analyzed using statistical data. In this study, researchers collected data regarding a symptom that occurs as a result of the learning process. The source of the data in this study was obtained by administering a three tier multiple choice diagnostic tests to a predetermined sample. Based on the data obtained in items 1, 7, 11 of the 18 items it is said that the highest misconception is because students cannot explain the characteristics of a solid substance correctly. Judging from these problems, students experienced misconceptions of reasoning or incomplete or incorrect reasoning. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it can be concluded as follows: There is a misconception about the concept of substances and their characteristics. The percentage of misconceptions about the concept of substances and their characteristics is 30%. The percentage of false negative misconceptions on the concept of substances and their characteristics is 8%. The percentage of false positive misconceptions on the concept of substances and their characteristics is 28%.

Keywords

Miskonsepsi three tier test zat dan karakteristiknya misconceptions three tier test their characteristics

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Dewi Mulyani, Lukman Nulhakim, Mudmainah Vitasari

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mulyani, D., Lukman Nulhakim, & Mudmainah Vitasari. (2024). Analisis Miskonsepsi Konsep Zat dan Karakteristiknya Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP: Analysis Misconceptions Of The Concept Substances and Characteristics Grade 7th Students at Junior High School Bani Tamim. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.3.439-444
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adityawardani, D., & Hidayat, S. N. (2017). Profil Konsepsi Siswa SMP dengan CRI Test Berbasis Revised Bloom's Taxonomy Pada Materi Klasifikasi Materi dan Perubahannya. E-Jurnal Pensa, 05(03), 335-340.
  2. Amry, U. W., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Asam Basa pada Pembelajaran Konvensional dan Dual Situated Learning Model (DSLM). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(3), 385-391.
  3. Arikunto. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. Baharudin. (2009). Pendidikan dan Psikologi Perkembangan. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  5. Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020, Juni 1). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assessment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Golden Age, 04(1), 30-41.
  6. Iskandar, S. M., Ibnu, S., & dkk. (2011). Pendekatan Pembeajaran Sains Berbasis Kontruktivistik. Malang: Bayumedia.
  7. Khasanah, A., & Cahyani, I. (2016, Juli). Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Dengan Strategi Question Answer Relationships (QAR) Pada Siswa Kelas V Skolah Dasar. Jurnal Pedagoogik Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 161-175.
  8. Resbiantoro, G., & Nugraha, A. W. (2017). Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Dasar Gaya Dan Gerak Untuk Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Sains, 5(2), 80-87.
  9. Sani, R. A., & Aulia, R. (2018). Upaya Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Training Pada Materi Pokok Momentum Dan Impuls Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Binjai T.P 2017/2018. Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri Medan, 4(3), 2461-1247
  10. Sanjaya, W. (2012). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana.
  11. Shui-Te, L., Kusuma, I. W., Wardani, S., & Harjito. (2019). Hasil Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Ditinjau Dari Aspek Makroskopis, Mikroskopis, dan Sibolik (MMS) Pada Pokok Bahasan Parti kulat Sifat Materi di Taiwan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2019-2030.
  12. Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi & Perubahan Konsep Dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
  13. Suwarto. (2017). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostic Dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  14. Wafiah, N. (2012).Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Faktor-faktor Penyebab Pada Materi Permutasian dan Kombinasi Di SMA Negeri 1 Manyar. Jurnal Gamatika, 11(2), 1-7.
  15. Wuryanti, S., Yennita, & Fakhruddin. (2017). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Dinamika Gerak Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Pilihan Ganda Tiga Tingkat. Jurnal Geliga Sains, 5(2), 110-118.