Main Article Content

Abstract

The student’s learning outcome on 1st general chemistry is in the low score. Based on the observation, most of the students tend to memorize the formulas rather than understand the concepts that involve in almost chemistry subjects. Sometimes, this could lead to a misconception. Through this research, we are trying to identify the misconception that commonly happen in Chemical Kinetics to avoid the protracted mistakes that might affect the profession of theses student-teacher candidates. From this finding, it will also help the lecturers to find better teaching strategies and methods. The research approach used is a qualitative and descriptive approach. Subject of this research is the seconds year student-teacher candidates of chemistry education in Teachers College. The instrument that help to gather the student’s misconceptions is a four-tier diagnostic questions test, and to get more information on what causing the misconceptions we will do interview to some of the students.  From the analysis there are 52.17% of student who are misconception in rate equation reaction, 30.43% in order reaction, 13.04% inactivation energy, 17.39% rate constant reaction. From the inteview, it was found out that the causes of misconceptions are such as students’ unreadiness, inaccuracy in applying the concept during the learning process and lack of practices.

Article Details

How to Cite
Purba, F. J., Sihombing, C. Y., & Inabuy, M. (2025). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Kinetika Kimia Pada Mahasiswa Tahun Kedua Pendidikan Kimia . PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.9.1.46-52

References

  1. Agatha, B., Fanadrarul Amiza, R., & Sulistyaningsih, Y. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Calon Guru Kimia Dengan Menggunakan Two-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Ilmu Kimia, Vol. 5, Issue 2.
  2. Arifah, M., Jusniar, J., & Anwar, M. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Tiga Tingkat untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi. Chemistry Education Review, 6(1), 2597. https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v6i1.13315
  3. Fantiani, C., Win Afgani, M., Resti Tri Astuti, dan, & Pendidikan Kimia Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, P. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Berbantuan Certainty of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Pembelajaran Laju dan Orde Reaksi. JIPK, 17(1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK
  4. Habiddin, & Page, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of a four-tier diagnostic instrument for chemical kinetics (FTDICK). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218
  5. Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Misconceptions in rate of reaction and their impact on misconceptions in chemical equilibrium. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1405–1423. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1405
  6. Mahayasa, I. D. M. (2023). Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru dalam Menerapkan Pendekatan Saintifik Melalui Kegiatan Lesson Study dalam Kurikulum 2013. Indonesian Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v4i1.54409
  7. Mataram, M. I. A. M. A. N., On, L., Skill, S., Of, P., Mia, X. I., & Man, A. T. (2018). Chemistry education practice. Chemistry Education Practice, 1(2), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v7i2.7274
  8. Mayasri, A., Reza, M., & Nasir, D. M. (2023). Identifikasi dan Remediasi Miskonsepsi dengan Pendekatan Perubahan Konseptual pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Orbital: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 7(2).
  9. Nurrahmah, N. A., & Sukarmin. (2023). Pengembangan E-flipbook Interaktif dengan Strategi Conceptual Change sebagai Media Reduksi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Laju Reaksi. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.2.185-194
  10. Purba, F. J., Sitinjak, D. S., & Sinaga, K. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri untuk meningkatkan science process skills pada materi stoikiometri Applying inquiry learning model to improve science process skills in stoichiometry concept. In Pros. Sem. Nas. KPK, Vol. 4.
  11. Rahmawati, Y., Widhiyanti, T., & Mardiah, A. (2019a). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia Pada Konsep Particulate Of Matter. JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 4(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v4i2.4824
  12. Rahmawati, Y., Widhiyanti, T., & Mardiah, A. (2019b). Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia Pada Konsep Particulate of Matter. JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 4(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v4i2.4824
  13. Rina Elvia, Amelia, T., & Handayani, D. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Menggunakan Metode Four-Tier Diagnostik Test Di Sma Negeri 03 Kota Bengkulu. Alotrop, 6(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.33369/alo.v6i2.25099
  14. Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, W. (2023). Analisis Miskonsepsi Kimia dan Instrumen Diagnosisnya: Literatur Review. JIPK, Vol. 17, Issue 1. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK
  15. Sitorus, D. M., & Dalimunthe, M. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Five-Tier Multiple Choice untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Halu Oleo, 9(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpkim.v9i1.77
  16. Suharsimi, A. (2005). Manajemen Penelitian. Rineka Cipta.
  17. Zahro’, S. F., & Ismono, I. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Multirepresentasi Siswa Pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Chemistry Education Practice, 4(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i1.2338
  18. Zuhullaili, B. ilma H., Laksmiwati, D., & Siahaan, J. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Dalam Meyelesaikan Soal Kimia Pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi Oksidasi. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(2), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v5i2.2503