Main Article Content

Abstract

The goal of this study was to explore the effectiveness of implementing competition during a learning process to elevate motivation and science communication skills in a particular biotechnology education course among the third-year science education students at Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa using the BioVate competition, in which incorporates project-based learning (PjBL) within competitions during learning process. It is a unique model for competitive learning. A quasi-experimental model was employed on a sample comprising 67 undergraduate students. Students had no prior biotechnology training and the intervention lasted four weeks. It comprised problem identification and solving, solution development, as well as a culmination competition. In the assessment, significant changes with respect to motivation (mean 2.7 to 4.1, d 0.54) and comprehension (mean 8.7 to 18 out of 20, d 0.92) were noted in pretest-posttest analysis. In the observation, interview and document analysis, participants noted improvement with respect to good communication, articulation of complex ideas, increased self-confidence, and effective use of visual aids. The major premise of the BioVate model, the ability to tackle real problems (for example, the use of CRISPR technology for developing pest-resistant crops), was reported to have fostered intrinsic motivation and closed the theoretical-practical gap. These findings also support constructivist learning theory and self-determination theory by highlighting the impact of competition and collaboration on engagement. This new approach contributes to increasing comprehensive conceptual understanding in biotechnology and builds skills in future educators and science communicators to address societal issues with an interdisciplinary approach.

Keywords

biotechnology biovate competition conceptual undertanding science communications science education

Article Details

How to Cite
Kurniasih, S. (2025). Enhancing Biotechnology Education through BioVate Competition: Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Science Communication in Science Education. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 9(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.9.1.111-117

References

  1. Bentahar, S., Abada, R., Ykhlef, N., Soumia, B., Rofia, A., & Ykhlef, N. (2023). Biotechnology: Definitions, Types and Main Applications. YAMER Digital, 22(1), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.37896/YMER22.04/49
  2. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2015). Educational Research, 6th Edition.
  3. Davies, S. R. (2021). An Empirical and Conceptual Note on Science Communication’s Role in Society. Science Communication, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971642
  4. Diana, N., Yohannes, & Sukma, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of implementing project-based learning (PjBL) model in STEM education: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012146
  5. Dida, G. (2024). Biotechnology towards energy crops. CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-024-00245-y
  6. Dziob, D., Górska, U., Kołodziej, T., & Čepič, M. (2022). Physics competition to inspire learning and improve soft skills: a case of the Chain Experiment. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 32, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09620-y
  7. Entradas, M., Bauer, M. W., Marcinkowski, F., & Pellegrini, G. (2024). The Communication Function of Universities: Is There a Place for Science Communication? Minerva, 62(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09499-8
  8. Ferreira, R., Alves, B. L., Paiva, S. R. De, Fluminense, U. F., Valonguinho, C., & Castro, H. C. (2018). Teaching Biotechnology : A Demand Still to be Fully Attended. 4, 13–18.
  9. Hujjatusnaini, N., Corebima, A. D., Prawiro, S. R., & Gofur, A. (2022). the Effect of Blended Project-Based Learning Integrated With 21St-Century Skills on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.27148
  10. Jia, L., Jalaludin, N. A., & Rasul, M. S. (2023). Design Thinking and Project-Based Learning (DT-PBL): A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(8), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.20
  11. Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. I. (2021). Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022
  12. Maspul, K. A. (2024). Enhancing Project-Based Learning in STEM Education with Integrated Technology and Coding. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Information Technology, 1(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.61971/jisit.v1i1.20
  13. Spektor-Levy, O., Eylon, B. S., & Scherz, Z. (2009). Teaching scientific communication skills in science studies: Does it make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 875–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9150-6