Main Article Content

Abstract

It is known that some schools in Serang City are still not optimal in empowering students' Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) habits and tend to lead to the C1 - C3 cognitive domain. The purpose of this study was to describe the level of validity and analyze students' responses to the Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS)-based Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC) on Elements, Compounds, and Mixtures material in class VIII junior high school students (Phase D). Research and development was conducted using the R n D (Research and Development) method. The research was conducted using the ADDIE model which refers to the Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation stages. The instruments used are interview instruments, validation questionnaires and learner response questionnaires. The subjects in this study were 3 expert lecturers of Science Education and 60 junior high school students in grade VIII. The validity level of the HOTS-based test instrument reached a value of 93.20% with the category “Very Feasible” and obtained the results of students' responses with the category “Good” at a percentage of 79.98%. Therefore, the HOTS-based 4TMC test instrument is very feasible to be used by teachers as a reference for conducting tests on science materials, especially elements, compounds, and mixtures.

Keywords

Instrumen Tes 4TMC HOTS Unsur Test Instrument 4TMC HOTS Elements

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, B. W. D., Biru, L. T., & Islami, R. A. Z. E. (2025). Development of Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC) Test Instrument Based on Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) on Elements, Compounds and Mixtures Material: Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Four-Tier Multiple Choice (4TMC) Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Materi Unsur, Senyawa dan Campuran. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 442–449. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.9.2.442-449

References

  1. Ainia, D.K. (2020). Merdeka belajar dalam pandangan Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan relevansinya bagi pengembanagan pendidikan karakter. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 3(3), 95–101.
  2. Agustiawan, E., Fuady, A. (2023). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Uraian Ujian Tengah Semester Mata Kuliah Statistik. Educare: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 16 – 24.
  3. Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Pendekatan Suatu Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  4. Azmi, N.L., Nurhayati, S., Priatmoko, S., Wardani, S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur HOTS Peserta Didik Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Journal of Chemistry In Education, 10(1), 45-52.
  5. Dinni, H.N. (2018). HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) dan Kaitannya dengan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 170-176.
  6. Fatimah, L.U., Alfath, K. (2019). Analisis Kesukaran Soal, Daya Pembeda dan Fungsi Distraktor. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 37-64.
  7. Faradisa, B.T.Z.V., Kurniasih,S., Berlian, L. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes 4TMC CBT Pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan untuk Mengukur Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(4), 909-918.
  8. Pusppitasari, W.D., Febrinita, F. (2021). Pengujian Validasi Isi (Content Validity) Angket Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Matakuliah Matematika Komputasi. Journal Focus Action of Reseacrh Mathematic (Factor M), 4(1), 77-90.
  9. Rajagukguk, M.J.K., Naibabo, D. 2023. Mampu Memilih Soal Berdasarkan Tingkat Kesukaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora. 2(4).
  10. Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  11. Wola, B.R., Ibrahim, M., Purnomo, T. (2020). Development of a Four-Tier Multipl Choice Test on The Concept of Transport Across Membranes. Sciene Education Journal, 4(2), 77-97.