Main Article Content

Abstract

Cultivating critical thinking skills in colloidal subjects is difficult due to the intricacy of abstract concepts, even though they are pertinent to daily life. This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) learning model in improving high school students' critical thinking skills in colloid science. This pre-experimental study employed a one-group pretest-posttest design with 36 11th-grade science students chosen via purposive sampling. The research instrument comprised an essay test formulated according to Facione’s critical thinking indicators. The findings demonstrated a substantial enhancement in students’ average scores, rising from 32.55 to 75.14, accompanied by a Normalized Gain (N-gain) of 0.635 (moderate). An analysis based on indicators showed that the POE model was best at helping students improve their deduction and inference skills, but it still needed work on helping them figure out how trustworthy information sources are. This study concludes that the POE model is effective in enhancing scientific argumentation; however, it necessitates supplementary scaffolding to fortify students' metacognitive skills in the validation of external information.

Keywords

Berpikir Kritis Koloid Model POE; Pendidikan Kimia

Article Details

How to Cite
Sihite, M. S., Asri, Z., Ali, S. C., Yasthophi, A., & Kurniawati, Y. (2026). The Effectiveness of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Model in Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills on Colloid Topic. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.10.1.92-99

References

  1. Alfiyanti, I. F., Jatmiko, B., & Wasis. (2020). The Effectiveness of Predict Observe Explain (POE) Model with PhET to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.34
  2. Ali, S., Talib, C. A., & Jamal, A. M. (2023). Digital Technology Approach A Systematic Literature Review in Chemistry Education : Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v6i1.21777
  3. Alifah, I. N., Handayani, R. D., & Sudarti. (2024). The Influence of Learning Motivation on Students ’ Eco-Literacy of Environmental Pollution Material. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 13(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v13i2.18995 SCIENTIAE
  4. Bierer, S. B., Dallaghan, G. B., Borges, N. J., Brondfield, S., Fung, C. C., Huggett, K. N., Teal, C. R., Thammasitboon, S., & Colbert, C. Y. (2025). Moving Beyond Simplistic Research Design in Health Professions Education : What a One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design Will Not Prove. Teaching and Learning Resources, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11527
  5. Darmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2023). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on the Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 11(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v11i2.55620
  6. Facione, P. A. (2023). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasone, 1–30. https://doi.org/https://insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Critical Thinking What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts.
  7. Fauziah, Suyanti, R. D., & Silaban, R. (2024). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar (e-Book) Kimia Berbasis CTL-PBL Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 12(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms
  8. Gustina, R., Hastuti, I. D., Nizaar, M., & Syaharuddin. (2023). Predict Observe Explain Learning Model : Implementation and Its Influence on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability and Learning Outcomes (A Meta-Analysis Study. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 9(2), 706–718. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i2.7388
  9. Karsli Baydere, F. (2021). Effects of a context-based approach with prediction-observation-explanation on conceptual understanding of the states of matter, heat and temperature. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 640–652. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00348d
  10. Kemendikbud, K. (2022). eraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.https://doi.org/https://atmks.id/wpcontent/uploads/2023/03/https_jdih.kemdikbud.go_.id_sjdih_siperpu_dokumen_salinan_salinan_20220209_133143_PERMENDIKBUDRISTEK-NOMOR-5-TAHUN-2022_JDIH-1.pdf
  11. Muteti, C. Z., Zarraga, C., Jacob, B. I., Mwarumba, T. M., Nkhata, D. B., Mwavita, M., Mohanty, S., & Mutambuki, J. M. (2021). I realized what I was doing was not working: The influence of explicit teaching of metacognition on students’ study strategies in a general chemistry I course†. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00217h
  12. Ni’mah, N. (2022). Analysis of Critical Thinking Indicators on The Character of Curiosity in 2013 Curriculum. Anterior Junal, 22(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.vxix.xxx.
  13. Nurika, M. M., Vitasari, M., & Taufik, A. N. (2022). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis POE dalam Melatih Keterampilan Proses Sains pada Tema Pelestarian Lingkungan. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 739–745. https://doi.org/https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/pendipa
  14. Pitaloka, N. A., Inayah, N., Huda, M. N., & Setyawati, M. (2024). Fostering Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Epistemological Beliefs through Flipbook-Assisted POE2WE. 7(2), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v7i2.32666
  15. Putri, I. T. A., Agusdianita, N., & Desri. (2024). Literasi dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Era Digital. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies SHEs:, 7(3), 2057–2066. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/shes
  16. Qomariah, Y. N., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2021). Efektifitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Predict Observe Explain untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA dengan Metode Library Research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.1.49-56
  17. Ramdayani, R., Marifatul, K., Yurniwati, & Taofik. (2023). Innovative Strategies in Science Education : Implementing the POE Model to Enhance Elementary School Students’ Science Process Skills. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 12(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v12i1.13706 SCIENTIAE
  18. Rushiana, R. A., Sumarna, O., & Anwar, S. (2023). Efforts to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemistry Learning: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(3), 1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2632
  19. Safitri, N., Agnafia, D. N., & Anfa, Q. (2024). The effect of the predict observe and explain learning model on critical thinking ability of junior high school students on environmental pollution. BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 119. -https://doi.org/10.20527/bino.v6i1.16268
  20. Sari, O. B. M., Risdianto, E., & Sutarno. (2020). Analisis kebutuhan pengembangan LKPD berbasis POE berbantuan augmented reality untuk melatihkan keterampilan proses dasar pada konsep fluida statis. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 4(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.4.2.85-93
  21. Wati, E., Nurhanurawati, & Wijaya, A. P. (2025). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Komik dengan Model Discovery Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 13(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpms Jurnal