Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
November 14, 2022
Diterima
November 30, 2022
Diterbitkan
November 30, 2022
Unduh
Yusnia (English)
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 448 Unduh : 609

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

This study aims to describe the proportion of the dimensions of knowledge, cognitive level, and affective level about the social studies subject school exam questions for Grade VI Elementary School students in Bengkulu City in the 2021/2022 academic year. This type of research is descriptive research. The object of this research is the grid, questions, and answer keys for school exam questions. The instrument in this study is documentation, including an analysis sheet of the proportion of knowledge dimensions, cognitive levels, and affective levels of school exam questions. The research data in the form of the proportion of the dimensions of knowledge, cognitive level, and affective level were analyzed and then calculated the percentage. The results showed: 1) the proportion of knowledge dimensions, including factual knowledge is 29 items (82.86%) and conceptual knowledge is 6 items (17.14%); 2) the proportion of cognitive levels, including Level 1 (LOTS) is 3 items (8.57%), Level 2 (MOTS) is 11 items (31.43%), and Level 3 (HOTS) is 21 items (60 %); 3) the proportion of affective levels, including the level of responding (A2) is 1 item (2.86%), appreciating (A3) is 7 items (20%), organizing (A4) is 2 items (5.71%) , and characterization by value (A5) is 1 item (2.86%).

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Yusnia

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cara Mengutip
Yusnia. (2022). Studi Deskriptif Dimensi Pengetahuan, Level Kognitif, dan Jenjang Afektif Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Mata Pelajaran IPS SD Kota Bengkulu Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Jurnal PGSD, 15(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.15.2.159-166
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Referensi

  1. Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2017). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. In Bumi Aksara. Bumi Aksara.
  2. Agustina, R., Rustini, T., & Wahyuningsih, Y. (2022). Analisis butir soal penilaian akhir semester muatan pembelajaran IPS di kelas 5: Ditinjau dari kompetensi abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 1.
  3. Alawiyah, F. (2015). Perubahan kebijakan ujian nasional (studi pelaksanaan ujian nasional 2015). Jurnal Aspirasi, 6(2), 189–202.
  4. Aslamiah, S. B. A., Irwan Koto, & Endang Widi Winarni. (2022). Analisis Butir Soal Ditinjau Dari Unsur Dimensi Pengetahuan Dan Jenjang Kognitif Soal Ujian Sekolah Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020 dan 2020/2021 Mata Pelajaran IPA SDN 04 Kecamatan Pendopo. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar (Kapedas), 1(2), 121–129.
  5. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (2019). Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  6. Halimah, L. (2017). Keterampilan Mengajar: Sebagai Inspirasi untuk Menjadi Guru yang Excellent di Abad Ke-21. PT. Refika Aditama.
  7. Ismet Basuki dan Hariyanto. (2017). Asesmen Pembelajaran. PT. remaja Rosdakarya.
  8. Isti’farin, Paidi, & Adawiyah, R. (2016). Analysis the mastery of process and product cognitive of students in biology learning class XI senior high school in terms of school favorability. Proceeding The 2nd International Conference On Teacher Training and Education Sebelas Maret University, 2(1), 437–447.
  9. Krathwohl, A. and. (2002). ( A REVISION OF BLOOM ’ S TAXONOMY ) Sumber. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–219.
  10. Kurniawan, H. (2020). Pembelajaran Era 4.0: Integrasi Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter, Keterampilan Abad 21, HOTS, dan Literasi dalam Pespektif Merdeka Belajar. Media Akademi.
  11. Rahmadhani, Y., Koto, I. K., & Winarni, E. W. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Mata Pelajaran IPA Berdasarkan Dimensi Pengetahuan Faktual dan Konseptual Ditinjau Dari Konten dan Konteks. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 1–12.
  12. Rudy Gunawan. (2013). Pendidikan IPS. Alfabeta.
  13. Sapriya. (2017). Pendidikan IPS: Konsep dan Pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Valen, A. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Guru Dan Kemampuan Menyusun Soal Mid Semester Mata Pelajaran IPS Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1084–1097. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.501
  15. Wasidi. (2020). Tes dan Pengukuran Pendidikan. Halaman Moeka Publishing.
  16. Yusnia., Badeni., dan P. D. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Sekolah Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Kelas VI SDN Kota Bengkulu Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 43–52.