Main Article Content
Abstract
Analysis of the Reading Ability of 2nd Grade Elementary School Students with EGRA as a Diagnostic Assessment in Muara Enim Regency aims to describe the reading ability of 2nd grade school students with EGRA as a diagnostic assessment in Muara Enim Regency. This research uses descriptive quantitative research methods. The data collection technique used was a reading diagnostic assessment test using EGRA (Early Grade Reading Assessment). The sample in this research was 287 2nd grade students in Muara Enim Regency. The EGRA test carried out consists of several subtasks based on literacy components. namely oral comprehension, vocabulary, phonics, fluency, reading comprehension, and the alphabet. Based on the research results, the reading ability of 2nd grade elementary school students in Muara Enim Regency, in the oral comprehension subtask of students is still low, the average student score is 1.68. In the Vocabulary subtask is good, the average score of students' vocabulary knowledge was 5.53. In the Phonics subtask is good, the average phonics score for meaningful words was 7.53 and the average phonics score for meaningless words was 6.36. In the subtask, students' fluency is still below the class standard, the average fluency score is 43.68 from the class standard of 60. In the reading comprehension subtask, students are still low, the average reading comprehension score is 1.29. In the alphabet knowledge subtask, students know letter names well but do not know letter sounds, the average alphabet knowledge of letter names is 42.32 and the average score for knowledge of alphabet sounds is 10.36.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2024 Fadilah Prastikawati, Harini Bunda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- ACDP. (2014). Pentingnya Membaca dan Penilaian di Kelas-kelas Awal. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/8578
- Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
- Citra, O. :, Sari, P., & Yogyakarta, U. N. (2018). Faktor-faktor penyebab rendahnya minat membaca siswa kelas iv factors that cause low reading interest of 4 th grade Students. Basic Education, 7(32).
- Dahurandi, K., Nase, V., & St Sirilus Ruteng, S. (2022). Literasi manusia, sosial dan religius dalam menghadapi era industri 4.0 dan era masyarakat 5.0 human, sosial and religius literacy in facing the industry era 4.0 and society era 5.0. Jurnal Alternatif Wacana Ilmiah Interkultural, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.60130/JA.V11I1.72
- Danuri, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan transformasi teknologi digital. Jurnal ilmiah infokam, 15(2).
- Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2017). An Update to Compiled ORF Norms. http://brt.uoregon.edu.
- Hilman, A., Zuhdi, A., & Sari, S. (2019). Pengembangan aplikasi pembelajaran berbasis android studi kasus: belajar membaca untuk anak balita. In Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan ke (Vol. 5).
- Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11164371
- RTI International. (2016). Early grade reading assessment (egra) toolkit second edition.
- Sanoe, b. c., tiatri, s., & patmonodewo, s. (2019). efektivitas pelatihan bunyi huruf dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca awal siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 3(2), 440. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v3i2.6022
- Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations.
- Stern, J. M. B., Dubeck, M. M., & Dick, A. (2018). Using Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) data for targeted instructional support: Learning profiles and instructional needs in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2017.12.003
- Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D . Alfabeta.
- Supriyadi, S., Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., Isnaeni, W., Susilaningsih, E., & Suraji, S. (2022). Penyusunan Instrumen Asesmen Diagnostik untuk Persiapan Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal of Community Empowerment, 2(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/JCE.V2I2.61886.
- Suryawati, A., & Chaesar, S. (2020). Pengaruh bahasa daerah terhadap penggunaan bahasa indonesia di smp negeri 10 magelang.
- Usmaedi, u. (2021). Education curriculum for society 5.0 in the next decade. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar setiabudhi, 4(2), 63–79. https://stkipsetiabudhi.e-journal.id/jpds/article/view/94
- Wahyu Lestari, R. P., & Kamsiyati, S. (2021). Analisis kesulitan membaca pemahaman pada peserta didik kelas v sekolah dasar. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v9i1.48737
- World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology. www.weforum.org
- Yuni, E., Dwi, W. ;, Sudjimat, A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Di Era Global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 1, No. 26, pp. 263-278).
References
ACDP. (2014). Pentingnya Membaca dan Penilaian di Kelas-kelas Awal. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/8578
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Citra, O. :, Sari, P., & Yogyakarta, U. N. (2018). Faktor-faktor penyebab rendahnya minat membaca siswa kelas iv factors that cause low reading interest of 4 th grade Students. Basic Education, 7(32).
Dahurandi, K., Nase, V., & St Sirilus Ruteng, S. (2022). Literasi manusia, sosial dan religius dalam menghadapi era industri 4.0 dan era masyarakat 5.0 human, sosial and religius literacy in facing the industry era 4.0 and society era 5.0. Jurnal Alternatif Wacana Ilmiah Interkultural, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.60130/JA.V11I1.72
Danuri, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan transformasi teknologi digital. Jurnal ilmiah infokam, 15(2).
Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2017). An Update to Compiled ORF Norms. http://brt.uoregon.edu.
Hilman, A., Zuhdi, A., & Sari, S. (2019). Pengembangan aplikasi pembelajaran berbasis android studi kasus: belajar membaca untuk anak balita. In Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan ke (Vol. 5).
Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11164371
RTI International. (2016). Early grade reading assessment (egra) toolkit second edition.
Sanoe, b. c., tiatri, s., & patmonodewo, s. (2019). efektivitas pelatihan bunyi huruf dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca awal siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni, 3(2), 440. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v3i2.6022
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations.
Stern, J. M. B., Dubeck, M. M., & Dick, A. (2018). Using Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA) data for targeted instructional support: Learning profiles and instructional needs in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 61, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2017.12.003
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D . Alfabeta.
Supriyadi, S., Lia, R. M., Rusilowati, A., Isnaeni, W., Susilaningsih, E., & Suraji, S. (2022). Penyusunan Instrumen Asesmen Diagnostik untuk Persiapan Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal of Community Empowerment, 2(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/JCE.V2I2.61886.
Suryawati, A., & Chaesar, S. (2020). Pengaruh bahasa daerah terhadap penggunaan bahasa indonesia di smp negeri 10 magelang.
Usmaedi, u. (2021). Education curriculum for society 5.0 in the next decade. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar setiabudhi, 4(2), 63–79. https://stkipsetiabudhi.e-journal.id/jpds/article/view/94
Wahyu Lestari, R. P., & Kamsiyati, S. (2021). Analisis kesulitan membaca pemahaman pada peserta didik kelas v sekolah dasar. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v9i1.48737
World Economic Forum. (2015). New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology. www.weforum.org
Yuni, E., Dwi, W. ;, Sudjimat, A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Di Era Global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 1, No. 26, pp. 263-278).