Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 72 Download : 49

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to investigate listening strategies employed by English students and listening tasks assigned by lecturers in online listening classes. This research was descriptive quantitative with the design was a survey. The sample of this research was 119 students of the fourth semester of the English Education study program of Bengkulu University. The listening strategies questionnaire developed by the previous study and the listening tasks questionnaire created by the researcher. To determine the category of listening strategies employed by the students, the researcher used the rating scheme strategy. The findings of the result have revealed that the students highly preferred to employ Socio-Affective strategies, followed by Metacognitive strategies, and the least was Cognitive strategies. The lecturers frequently assigned the students by giving summarizing task. The findings of the result also showed that the listening task assigned by lecturers was suitable for the need of students. It is concluded that most of the students were using strategies when they are doing listening and doing the listening task. But the Cognitive strategies were not too good employed by students. The lecturers frequently assigned the students by giving summarizing tasks, which referred to Cognitive strategies.

Keywords

Listening Strategies Tasks Online Listening Classes

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of English Education and Teaching

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Hely Nopita Sari, Azwandi, A., & Elfrida, E. (2024). Listening Strategies Employed by Students and Listening Tasks Assigned by Lecturers in Online Listening Classes. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 8(3), 735–748. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/JEET/article/view/20543
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  2. Bao. X. (2017). A study on listening strategies instructed by teachers and strategies used by students. International Journal of English Linguistics. 7(2). 186-195. DOI:10.5539/IJEL.V7N2P186
  3. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  4. Gay. L. R.. Mills. G. E.. & Airasian. P. (2012). Educational reasearch: Competence for analysis and applications. Tenth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Inc.
  5. Hanifah. N. (2020). The listening strategies of the senior high school students: An Overview. RETAIN. 8(2).171-178. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/33140
  6. Hidayanti. I.. & Umamah. A. (2019). Listening strategy preference by non-native English university students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan. 2(2). https://jim.unisma.ac.id/index.php/fkip/article/view/3442/3104
  7. Kazemi &Kiamarsi. (2017). An investigation into listening comprehension strategies and the relationship between listening comprehension strategies and overall profiency level of intermediate and advanced learners. Journal of language teaching research. 8(1).149. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.18
  8. Khoshsima. H.. & Tasuj. Z. S. (2014). The impact of task types on listening comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 3(3). 97-103. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.97
  9. Kurita. T. (2012). Issues in second language listening comprehension and the pedagogical implications. Accents Asia. 5(1). 30-44. http://www.issues.accentsasia.org/issues/5-1/kurita.pdf
  10. Liu, H. J. (2008). A study of the interrelationship between listening strategy use, listening proficiency levels, and learning style. Annual Review of Education, Comunication & Language Sciences.5. 84-104. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/researchwebsites/arecls/liu_vol5.pdf
  11. Morissan. 2015. Metode penelitian survei. Jakarta: Kencana.
  12. O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot. A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Oxford. R. (1990). Language learning strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher
  14. Rost. M. (2013). Teaching and researching: Listening. Routledge.
  15. Rubin. J. (1981). Study of Cognitive Process in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics. (2). strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System. 36. 52-68.
  16. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Afabeta.
  17. Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
  18. Vandergrift. L.. & Goh. C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening (first edit). New York: Routledge.
  19. Vogely, A. (1995). Perceived strategy use during performance on three authentic listening comprehension tasks. Modern Language Journal, 79, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05414.x
  20. Yulisa. D. (2018). Learning to listen: Listening strategies and listening comprehension of Islamic senior high school students. Edukasi Pendidikan Dan Pengajar. 5(1). 22-30. https://doi.org/10.19109/ejpp.v5i1.2046
  21. Zuhairi. A. & Hidayanti. I. (2016). The strategies of Indonesian junior high school students in learning listening skill. Arab World English Journal. 7(4). 117 - 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2898619