Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 2, 2024
Accepted
August 7, 2024
Published
August 9, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 223 Download : 81

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This scoping study examines the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Project-Based Learning (PBL) for diversified English language training and its benefits, drawbacks, and trends. Arksey and O'Malley's approach and PRISMA-ScR systematically review peer-reviewed articles from the last decade from Google Scholar, Scopus, ERIC, DOAJ, PubMed, and Science Direct. A complete literature search, inclusion-based selection, data extraction, and thematic analysis are used. AI can improve PBL by offering individualized learning, real-time feedback, and immersive learning settings. Intelligent virtual assistants, smart grading systems, and adaptive learning technologies provide personalized instruction that improves learning results and inclusivity. However, the analysis also notes ethical issues connected to data privacy and algorithmic biases and the need for teacher training to use AI in schools effectively. Despite these obstacles, AI in PBL can transform English language instruction by encouraging critical thinking, cooperation, and communication. This scoping review concludes that AI in PBL can transform differentiated English language instruction. To fully realize the benefits of AI-integrated PBL and improve English language learning for all students, research and innovation must continue.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Differentiated Instruction English Language Learning differentiated instruction Personalized Learning

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Arqam, Andi Asrifan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Arqam, & Andi Asrifan. (2024). Integrating AI in Project-Based Learning for Differentiated English Language Instruction: A Scoping Review. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 8(3), 586–608. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.8.3.586-608
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdul Ghani, A. S., Abdul Rahim, A. F., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Hadie, S. N. H. (2022). Developing an interactive PBL environment via persuasive gamify elements: A scoping review. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00193-z springer.com
  2. Akbarialiabad, H., Taghrir, M. H., Abdollahi, A., Ghahramani, N., Kumar, M., Paydar, S., ... & Bastani, B. (2021). Long COVID, a comprehensive systematic scoping review. Infection, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01666-x springer.com
  3. Al Rajab, M., Odeh, S., Hazboun, S., & Alheeh, E. (2023, July). AI-Powered Smart Book: Enhancing Arabic Education in Palestine with Augmented Reality. In International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (pp. 167-178). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43461-7_17 [HTML]
  4. Alam, A. (2023). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI-enabled learning ecologies with real world examples of today and a peek into the future. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0129803 [HTML]
  5. Alarifi, I. M. (2023). Learning Limitless Knowledge: Transformative Learning Pathway to Unlocking and Harnessing the Endless Power of Knowledge. [HTML]
  6. Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331 wiley.com
  7. Alharthi, S. M. (2024). Siri as an interactive pronunciation coach: its impact on EFL learners. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2304245 tandfonline.com
  8. Aliabadi, R. (2023). … Impact of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Course on Middle-School Students' Interest, Knowledge, and Career Aspiration in the AI …. [HTML]
  9. Almulla, M. A. (2020). The effectiveness of the project-based learning (PBL) approach as a way to engage students in learning. Sage Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702 sagepub.com
  10. Alqahtani, T., Badreldin, H. A., Alrashed, M., Alshaya, A. I., Alghamdi, S. S., bin Saleh, K., ... & Albekairy, A. M. (2023). The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 19(8), 1236-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.016 sciencedirect.com
  11. Amri, M. M., Jessiman-Perreault, G., Siddiqi, A., O’Campo, P., Enright, T., & Di Ruggiero, E. (2021). Scoping review of the World Health Organization’s underlying equity discourses: apparent ambiguities, inadequacy, and contradictions. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01400-x springer.com
  12. Androsavich, J. R. (2024). Frameworks for transformational breakthroughs in RNA-based medicines. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-024-00943-2 [HTML]
  13. Arabloo, P., Hemmati, F., Rouhi, A., & Khodabandeh, F. (2021). The effect of technology-aided project-based English learning on critical thinking and problem solving as indices of 21st century learning. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(1), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.14077.1730 ikiu.ac.ir
  14. Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983 mdpi.com
  15. Banha, F., Coelho, L. S., & Flores, A. (2022). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review and identification of an existing gap in the field. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050336 mdpi.com
  16. Barrot, J. S. (2022). Social media as a language learning environment: a systematic review of the literature (2008-2019). Computer assisted language learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1883673 [HTML]
  17. Belda-Medina, J. & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178427 mdpi.com
  18. Beseiso, M., Alzubi, O. A., & Rashaideh, H. (2021). A novel automated essay scoring approach for reliable higher educational assessments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33, 727-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09283-1 [HTML]
  19. Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068 sciencedirect.com
  20. Biswas, P. K. & Dygas, R. (). SMART CITIES IN EUROPE AND ASIA. api.taylorfrancis.com. [HTML]
  21. Bobis, J., Russo, J., Downton, A., Feng, M., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Sullivan, P. (2021). Instructional moves that increase chances of engaging all students in learning mathematics. Mathematics, 9(6), 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060582 mdpi.com
  22. Boss, S. & Krauss, J. (2022). Reinventing project-based learning: Your field guide to real-world projects in the digital age. [HTML]
  23. Brenner, S. (2022). The ethics of marriage in American evangelicalism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13701 [HTML]
  24. Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2021). Forms of implementation and challenges of PBL in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615 tandfonline.com
  25. Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4 [HTML]
  26. Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118 sciencedirect.com
  27. Cooper, R., Fitzgerald, A., Loughran, J., Phillips, M., & Smith, K. (2020). Understanding teachers’ professional learning needs: what does it mean to teachers and how can it be supported?. Teachers and teaching, 26(7-8), 558-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1900810 [HTML]
  28. Dai, C. P. & Ke, F. (2022). Educational applications of artificial intelligence in simulation-based learning: A systematic mapping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100087 sciencedirect.com
  29. De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2022). The functions of shared metacognitive regulation and their differential relation with collaborative learners' understanding of the learning content. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101527 [HTML]
  30. De Vivo, K. (2022). A new research base for rigorous project-based learning. Phi Delta Kappan. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221079977 sagepub.com
  31. Dei, D. G. J. & van der Walt, T. B. (2020). Knowledge management practices in universities: The role of communities of practice. Social sciences & humanities open. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100025 sciencedirect.com
  32. DeMink-Carthew, J., & Olofson, M. W. (2022). Hands-joined learning as a framework for personalizing project-based learning in a middle grades classroom: An exploratory study. In Dialogues in Middle Level Education Research Volume 1 (pp. 106-133). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1709776 tandfonline.com
  33. Devagiri, J. S., Paheding, S., Niyaz, Q., Yang, X., & Smith, S. (2022). Augmented Reality and Artificial Intelligence in industry: Trends, tools, and future challenges. Expert Systems with Applications, 207, 118002. sciencedirect.com
  34. Dong, Y., Hou, J., Zhang, N., & Zhang, M. (2020). Research on how human intelligence, consciousness, and cognitive computing affect the development of artificial intelligence. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1680845 wiley.com
  35. Duignan, P. A. (2020). Navigating the future of learning: The role of smart technologies. In Leading educational systems and schools in times of disruption and exponential change: A call for courage, commitment and collaboration (pp. 125-137). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83909-850-520201012 [HTML]
  36. Ebadi, S. & Amini, A. (2024). Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners' motivation using artificial intelligence technology: A case of CSIEC chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096638 [HTML]
  37. Eduardsen, J. & Marinova, S. (2020). Internationalisation and risk: Literature review, integrative framework and research agenda. International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101688 [HTML]
  38. Eimer, C., Duschek, M., Jung, A. E., Zick, G., Caliebe, A., Lindner, M., ... & Elke, G. (2020). Video-based, student tutor-versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students–a prospective randomized study. BMC medical education, 20, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02431-8 springer.com
  39. Farrell, T. S. C. & Jacobs, G. M. (2020). Essentials for successful English language teaching. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v38i1.1349 teslcanadajournal.ca
  40. Farshad, S., Zorin, E., Amangeldiuly, N., & Fortin, C. (2023). Engagement assessment in project-based education: A machine learning approach in team chat analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12381-5 [HTML]
  41. Feijóo, C., Kwon, Y., Bauer, J. M., Bohlin, E., Howell, B., Jain, R., ... & Xia, J. (2020). Harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) to increase wellbeing for all: The case for a new technology diplomacy. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101988 sciencedirect.com
  42. Foffano, F., Scantamburlo, T., & Cortés, A. (2023). Investing in AI for social good: an analysis of European national strategies. AI & society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01445-8 springer.com
  43. Grill, C. (2021). Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review. Research involvement and engagement. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00318-6 springer.com
  44. Gusenbauer, M. & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other …. Research synthesis methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378 wiley.com
  45. Gutierrez-Bucheli, L., Reid, A., & Kidman, G. (2022). Scoping reviews: Their development and application in environmental and sustainability education research. Environmental Education Research, 28(5), 645-673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2047896 tandfonline.com
  46. Hallinger, P. (2020). Mapping continuity and change in the intellectual structure of the knowledge base on problem‐based learning, 1974–2019: A systematic review. British Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3656 [HTML]
  47. Heinrich, W. F., Louson, E., Blommel, C., & Green, A. R. (2021). Who coaches the coaches? The development of a coaching model for experiential learning. Innovative Higher Education, 46(3), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09537-3 springer.com
  48. Ho, Y. Y. C. (2020). Communicative language teaching and English as a foreign language undergraduates’ communicative competence in Tourism English. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100271 [HTML]
  49. Holzinger, A., Lettner, S., Steiner-Hofbauer, V., & Capan Melser, M. (2020). How to assess? Perceptions and preferences of undergraduate medical students concerning traditional assessment methods. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02239-6 springer.com
  50. Imbaquingo, A. & Cárdenas, J. (2023). Project-based learning as a methodology to improve reading and comprehension skills in the English language. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060587 mdpi.com
  51. Jebril, T. & Chen, Y. (2021). The architectural strategies of classrooms for intellectually disabled students in primary schools regarding space and environment. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.09.005 sciencedirect.com
  52. Jeon, J. (2024). Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: Young learners' experiences and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241 [HTML]
  53. Jivram, T., Kavia, S., Poulton, E., Hernandez, A. S., Woodham, L. A., & Poulton, T. (2021). The development of a virtual world problem-based learning tutorial and comparison with interactive text-based tutorials. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 611813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.611813 frontiersin.org
  54. Kabudi, T., Pappas, I., & Olsen, D. H. (2021). AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017 sciencedirect.com
  55. Kamruzzaman, M. M., Alanazi, S., Alruwaili, M., Alshammari, N., Elaiwat, S., Abu-Zanona, M., ... & Ahmed Alanazi, B. (2023). AI-and IoT-assisted sustainable education systems during pandemics, such as COVID-19, for smart cities. Sustainability, 15(10), 8354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108354 mdpi.com
  56. Kärner, T., Warwas, J., & Schumann, S. (). A learning analytics approach to address heterogeneity in the classroom: The teachers' diagnostic support system. Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09448-4 springer.com
  57. Kaushik, M. (2020). Evaluating a first-year engineering course for project based learning (pbl) essentials. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.056 sciencedirect.com
  58. Khan, Z. F. & Alotaibi, S. R. (2020). Applications of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in m‐health: A healthcare system perspective. Journal of healthcare engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8894694 wiley.com
  59. King, O., West, E., Lee, S., Glenister, K., Quilliam, C., Wong Shee, A., & Beks, H. (2022). Research education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 385. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03406-7 springer.com
  60. Kong, S. C., Cheung, M. Y. W., & Tsang, O. (2024). Developing an artificial intelligence literacy framework: Evaluation of a literacy course for senior secondary students using a project-based learning approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100214 sciencedirect.com
  61. Koon, A. D., Windmeyer, L., Bigdeli, M., Charles, J., El Jardali, F., Uneke, J., & Bennett, S. (2020). A scoping review of the uses and institutionalisation of knowledge for health policy in low-and middle-income countries. Health research policy and systems, 18, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0522-2 springer.com
  62. Kornyo, E. A. (2021). Exploring the use of Artificial Intelligent Systems in STEM Classrooms. columbia.edu
  63. Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 springer.com
  64. Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424 mdpi.com
  65. Kumar, J. A. (2021). Educational chatbots for project-based learning: investigating learning outcomes for a team-based design course. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00302-w springer.com
  66. Langlotz Kondzic, V. (2023). … and Sustaining Growth of Educational Coaches in Interdisciplinary, Project Based Learning in Higher Education: a qualitative pilot study including expert insights. theseus.fi
  67. Li, T., Miller, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2023). Theory into practice: Supporting knowledge-in-use through project-based learning. In Fostering science teaching and learning for the fourth industrial revolution and beyond (pp. 1-35). IGI Global. [HTML]
  68. Lin, C. C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2023). A review of ai-driven conversational chatbots implementation methodologies and challenges (1999–2022). Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054012 mdpi.com
  69. Lin, Y. & Yu, Z. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots in educational contexts. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2022-0165 [HTML]
  70. Liu, M., Shi, Y., Pan, Z., Li, C., Pan, X., & Lopez, F. (2021). Examining middle school teachers’ implementation of a technology-enriched problem-based learning program: Motivational factors, challenges, and strategies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1768183 [HTML]
  71. Lopez-Gazpio, I. (2021). Gaining student engagement through project-based learning: A competitive 2d game construction case study. IEEE Access. ieee.org
  72. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2021). Not positive definite correlation matrices in exploratory item factor analysis: Causes, consequences and a proposed solution. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1735393 tandfonline.com
  73. Loyens, S. M., Van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem-and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x springer.com
  74. Luan, H., Geczy, P., Lai, H., Gobert, J., Yang, S. J., Ogata, H., ... & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Challenges and future directions of big data and artificial intelligence in education. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 580820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820 frontiersin.org
  75. Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076 sciencedirect.com
  76. Mageira, K., Pittou, D., Papasalouros, A., Kotis, K., Zangogianni, P., & Daradoumis, A. (2022). Educational AI chatbots for content and language integrated learning. Applied Sciences, 12(7), 3239. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073239 mdpi.com
  77. Maggio, L. A., Larsen, K., Thomas, A., Costello, J. A., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2021). Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review. Medical education, 55(6), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073239 wiley.com
  78. Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102 sciencedirect.com
  79. Mangione, S. (2021, June). The observation of art and the art of observing individuals with physical differences. In American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics (Vol. 187, No. 2, pp. 134-140). Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31898 [HTML]
  80. Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x springer.com
  81. Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4 springer.com
  82. McMeekin, N., Wu, O., Germeni, E., & Briggs, A. (2020). How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review. BMC medical research methodology, 20, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01061-4 springer.com
  83. Mizumoto, A. & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050 sciencedirect.com
  84. Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Hu, X., Downie, J. S., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8445-8501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11491-w researchgate.net
  85. Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., & Andersen, B. (2020). Does project-based learning (PBL) promote student learning? a performance evaluation. Education Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110330 mdpi.com
  86. Niemi, K. (2021). 'The best guess for the future?'Teachers' adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371 tandfonline.com
  87. Ortiz, J. M. (2023). Critical and intersectional gang studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003159797 [HTML]
  88. Owens, A. D., & Hite, R. L. (2022). Enhancing student communication competencies in STEM using virtual global collaboration project based learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(1), 76-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1778663 [HTML]
  89. Pan, A. J., Lai, C. F., & Kuo, H. C. (2023). Investigating the impact of a possibility-thinking integrated project-based learning history course on high school students' creativity, learning motivation, and history …. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101214 [HTML]
  90. Peters, M. D., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C. M., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., ... & Tricco, A. C. (2021). Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Systematic reviews, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3 springer.com
  91. Pham, S. T., & Sampson, P. M. (2022). The development of artificial intelligence in education: A review in context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1408-1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12687 [HTML]
  92. Pollock, D., Davies, E. L., Peters, M. D., Tricco, A. C., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., ... & Munn, Z. (2021). Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. Journal of advanced nursing, 77(4), 2102-2113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14743 wiley.com
  93. Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Enhanced product design and development using Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), 4D/5D/6D Printing, Internet of Things (IoT), and blockchain: A review. Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR) D, 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4644059 [HTML]
  94. Razak, A. A., Ramdan, M. R., Mahjom, N., Zabit, M. N. M., Muhammad, F., Hussin, M. Y. M., & Abdullah, N. L. (2022). Improving critical thinking skills in teaching through problem-based learning for students: A scoping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(2), 342-362. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.19 ijlter.net
  95. Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: Identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3 springer.com
  96. Revell, R. (2021). Becoming What We Are: A Theological Account of Self-Development Informed by William Perkins's Theology of Sanctification. cam.ac.uk
  97. Roberts, R. S. (2022). The Effect of Learner Profiling on Fourth Grade English Students' PIRLS Achievement Scores of Students Whose Teachers Are Credentialed or Non-Credentialed. liberty.edu
  98. Roldán-Álvarez, D., Martín, E., & Haya, P. A. (2021). Collaborative video-based learning using tablet computers to teach job skills to students with intellectual disabilities. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080437 mdpi.com
  99. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Data mining and knowledge discovery, 10(3), e1355. [PDF]
  100. Ryshina-Pankova, M., Barthold, W., & Barthold, E. (2021). Enhancing the content-and language-integrated multiple literacies framework: Systemic functional linguistics for teaching regional diversity. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102403 [HTML]
  101. Saad, A. & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101802 [HTML]
  102. Sánchez-Bayón, A. & Aznar, E. T. (2021). Rise and fall of human research and the improvement of talent development in digital economy. Studies in Business and Economics. sciendo.com
  103. Schiavone, F., Pietronudo, M. C., Sabetta, A., & Ferretti, M. (2022). Total quality service in digital era. The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2021-0377 emerald.com
  104. Schreiber, F. & Cramer, C. (2022). Towards a conceptual systematic review: proposing a methodological framework. Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2116561 tandfonline.com
  105. Schumann, F., Steinborn, M. B., Kürten, J., Cao, L., Händel, B. F., & Huestegge, L. (2022). Restoration of attention by rest in a multitasking world: Theory, methodology, and empirical evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 867978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867978 frontiersin.org
  106. Seo, M., Kim, Y., Park, J., Sim, G., & Ko, Y. (2024). The Evolution of Phenomenology in Korean Nursing Research: A Scoping Review. Asian Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2024.01.004 sciencedirect.com
  107. Sergeant, D. C. & Himonides, E. (2023). Performing sex: The representation of male and female musicians in three genres of music performance. Psychology of Music. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221115458 sagepub.com
  108. Sheikh, S. (2020). Understanding the role of artificial intelligence and its future social impact. [HTML]
  109. Singh, B. J., Chakraborty, A., & Sehgal, R. (2023). A systematic review of industrial wastewater management: Evaluating challenges and enablers. Journal of Environmental Management, 348, 119230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119230 sciencedirect.com
  110. Singha, R., & Singha, S. (2024). Application of Experiential, Inquiry-Based, Problem-Based, and Project-Based Learning in Sustainable Education. In Teaching and Learning for a Sustainable Future: Innovative Strategies and Best Practices (pp. 109-128). IGI Global. [HTML]
  111. Sormunen, K., Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2020). Maker-centered project-based learning in inclusive classes: Supporting students’ active participation with teacher-directed reflective discussions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 691-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09998-9 springer.com
  112. Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: an ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. oapen.org
  113. Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. D. C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., ... & Brose, A. (2022). Towards active evidence-based learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability, 14(21), 13955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955 mdpi.com
  114. Sullivan, S. R., Monahan, M. F., Mitchell, E. L., Spears, A. P., Walsh, S., Szeszko, J. R., ... & Goodman, M. (2021). Group treatments for individuals at risk for suicide: A PRISMA scoping review (ScR). Psychiatry research, 304, 114108. sciencedirect.com
  115. Sun, L., Guo, Z., & Zhou, D. (2022). Developing K-12 students' programming ability: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10891-2 [HTML]
  116. Sund, P. & Gericke, N. (2020). Teaching contributions from secondary school subject areas to education for sustainable development–a comparative study of science, social science and language …. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1754341 tandfonline.com
  117. Susanti, A., Retnaningdyah, P., & Trisusana, A. (2020, January). Students’ Perception Toward the Implementation of Project Based Learning for EFL Vocational High School. In International Conference on Research and Academic Community Services (ICRACOS 2019) (pp. 115-119). Atlantis Press. atlantis-press.com
  118. Tanga, X., Xu Dingb, X. M., Zhangd, S., & Diaoe, J. (2024, May). An Exploration of Project-Based Learning Supported by Artificial Intelligence. In 2024 5th International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE 2024) (pp. 220-230). Atlantis Press. atlantis-press.com
  119. THOMAS, M. S. (2024). Enhancing Divergent Thinking Among Gifted and Talented Students Through Targeted Instructional Approaches in K–6 Cluster Classes. researchgate.net
  120. Trainor, A. A. & Robertson, P. M. (2022). Culturally and linguistically diverse students with learning disabilities: Building a framework for addressing equity through empirical research. Learning Disability Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720929001 sagepub.com
  121. Uskoković, V. (2023). Natural sciences and chess: A romantic relationship missing from higher education curricula. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15015 cell.com
  122. van Biljon, J., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2020). The communicative power of knowledge visualizations in mobilizing information and communication technology research. Information Technology for Development, 26(4), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1821954 tandfonline.com
  123. van der Baan, N., Gast, I., Gijselaers, W., & Beausaert, S. (2022). Coaching to prepare students for their school-to-work transition: conceptualizing core coaching competences. Education+ Training, 64(3), 398-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2020-0341 emerald.com
  124. Walker, V. L., Douglas, K., Wang, C., & Li, Z. (2022). Special education teachers’ perspectives of effective pre-service training practices in systematic instruction for students with extensive support needs. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.2110362 [HTML]
  125. Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of research on technology in education, 52(3), 235-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1747757 tandfonline.com
  126. Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., & Pange, J. (2023). Exploring the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on international students in higher education: Generative AI, chatbots, analytics, and international student success. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116716 mdpi.com
  127. Wang, Y. (2023). Artificial Intelligence technologies in college English translation teaching. Journal of psycholinguistic research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09960-5 springer.com
  128. Wang, Y., Wong, E. L. Y., Nilsen, P., Chung, V. C. H., Tian, Y., & Yeoh, E. K. (2023). A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks—an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability. Implementation Science, 18(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01296-x springer.com
  129. Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955 frontiersin.org
  130. Weninger, C. (). Multimodality in critical language textbook analysis. Language. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1797083 [HTML]
  131. Wiacek, S. (2021). The DC Book: A Vast and Vibrant Multiverse Simply Explained. [HTML]
  132. Williamson, B. & Eynon, R. (). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995 tandfonline.com
  133. Wilson, K. (2021). Exploring the challenges and enablers of implementing a STEM project-based learning programme in a diverse junior secondary context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 881-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8 [HTML]
  134. Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez‐Maldonado, R., Chen, G., ... & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370 wiley.com
  135. Yang, X. (2023). A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9 springer.com
  136. Yang, Y. F., Tseng, C. C., & Lai, S. C. (2024). Enhancing teachers' self-efficacy beliefs in AI-based technology integration into English speaking teaching through a professional development program. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104582 [HTML]
  137. Yilmaz, R., Yurdugül, H., Yilmaz, F. G. K., Şahi̇n, M., Sulak, S., Aydin, F., ... & Ömer, O. R. A. L. (2022). Smart MOOC integrated with intelligent tutoring: A system architecture and framework model proposal. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100092 sciencedirect.com
  138. Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712 frontiersin.org
  139. Yu, H. (2024). Enhancing creative cognition through project-based learning: An in-depth scholarly exploration. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27706 cell.com
  140. Zaafour, A. & Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S. (2022). Incorporating cooperative project-based learning in the teaching of English as a foreign language: Teachers' perspectives. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060388 mdpi.com
  141. Zehnder, C., Metzker, J., Kleine, K., & Alby, C. (2021). Learning that matters: A field guide to course design for transformative education. [HTML]
  142. Zhai, C. & Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students' interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134 sciencedirect.com
  143. Zhan, Z., Shen, W., & Lin, W. (2022). … -based pedagogy on students' project management skills, learning achievement, creativity, and innovative thinking in a high-school artificial intelligence course. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849842 frontiersin.org
  144. Zhuhadar, L. P. & Lytras, M. D. (2023). The application of AutoML techniques in diabetes diagnosis: current approaches, performance, and future directions. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813484 mdpi.com
  145. Zou, D., Luo, S., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). A systematic review of research on flipped language classrooms: Theoretical foundations, learning activities, tools, research topics and findings. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1811-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839502 [HTML]