Main Article Content

Abstract

The objectives of this study were: (1) To analyze the implementation of control of productive slaughtering of cattle and female buffalo in Bengkulu Province based on George Edward III's policy implementation model, namely communication, resources, disposition of bureaucratic structures. (2) To analyze the implementation constraints of slaughtering productive female cattle and buffalo in Bengkulu Province. This research is a qualitative research with a descriptive design. Determination of informants in this study using the purpusive method, namely the maker and executor of policies to control the slaughter of productive female cattle and buffalo in Bengkulu Province as many as 9 people. The data collection used interviews and observations, while the descriptive qualitative data analysis was based on the Miles and Huberman stages. The results showed that the implementation of the control of productive female cattle and buffalo slaughter in Bengkulu Province from the aspects of (1) communication, that the delivery of information through socialization and distribution of brochures during the coaching activities of livestock groups. The submission of this information is only done once per year due to budget constraints. In terms of clarity, it is very clear from the district level to all parties involved in this policy, starting from the farmer level, business actors, and the regions involved. (2) Resources enough official personnel are available, but the veterinary paramedics are still lacking. Budget support for 2020 has experienced budget recofusing, so that for 2020 there will be no more activities. The local government is very supportive of the implementation of the control of productive female cattle slaughter. Then the supporting facilities are generally available, but for the facilities in the RPH starting from the building and other equipment it is necessary to make improvements and add to the facilities. (3) Disposition, that the local government and the community can accept it quite well. Related to incentives for policy implementers only for officers reporting daily deductions. (4) The bureaucratic structure, that the organizational structure is not yet supportive because the SOP prohibiting the slaughter of productive females is only owned by Mukomuko District, while all districts / cities do not yet exist. When viewed from the perspective of work effectiveness, managing this program is optimal, because it involves almost all sectors implementing this policy

Keywords

Implementation Communication Bureaucratic Structure Resources Disposition

Article Details

Author Biographies

Indah Permatasari, Universitas Bengkulu

Manajemen

Sugeng Susetyo, Universitas bengkulu

Manajemen
How to Cite
Permatasari, I., Widodo, S., & Susetyo, S. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Pengendalian Pemotongan Ternak Sapi dan Kerbau Betina Produktif di Provinsi Bengkulu. The Manager Review, 3(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.33369/tmr.v3i1.19603

References

  1. Abuya, T. 2010. Importance of Strategic Management in the Implementation of Private Medicine Retailer Programmes: Case Studies From Three Districts in Kenya. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 1-7.
  2. Anderson, J. E., 2010. Public policy making-An introduction. Boston: Wadsworth.
  3. Aritonang, M.W., 2017. Kecendrungan Pemotongan Sapi Dan Kerbau Betina Produktif Di Provinsi Jambi. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 20(1), 17-24.
  4. Bardach, E., 2017. The implementation game: what happens after a bill comes law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bempah, B.S.O., 2012. Policy Implementation: Budgeting and Financial Management Practices of District Health Directorates in Ghana, Bangkok: Doctoral dissertation, National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA).
  6. Bhuyan, A., Jorgensen, A. & Sharma, S., 2010. Taking the Pulse of Policy: The Policy Implementation Assessment Tool. Washington: USAID.
  7. Birkland, T. A., 2005. an introduction to the policy process theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
  8. Bramley, G. & Stewart, M., 2016. Implementing Public Expenditure Cuts. Policy and Action, Methuen, 52(6), 112-123.
  9. Cahyaningtyas, G. I., 2019. Pemotongan Sapi Betina Produktif Bisa Dipidanakan. Diakses dari: http://www.agrina-online.com [1 January 2020].
  10. Cline, K. D., 2018. Defining the Implementation Problem: Organizational Management versus Cooperation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(11), 551-571.
  11. Crosby, B., 2016. Policy Implementation: The Organisational Challenge. World Development, 24(9), 1403-1417.
  12. Dunn, W. N., 2013. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  13. Elmore, R. F., 1978. Organizational Models of Social Program Implementation. Public Policy, 26(2), 185-228.
  14. Elmore, R. F., 1979. Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions. Political science quarterly, 94(4), 601-616.
  15. Firestone, W., 2016. Educational policy as an ecology of games. Educational Researcher, 18(7), pp. 18-24.
  16. Fullan, M., 2017. The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
  17. Gerston, L. N., 2010. Public Policy Making: Process and Principles. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  18. Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A., Lester, J. & O?Toole, L., 2010. Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. New York: Herper Collins.
  19. Grindle, M. S. & Thomas, B., 2015. Public Choices and Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. Baltimore. American Political Science Review, 86(3), pp. 827-829.
  20. Hall, P. & Taylor, R., 2016. Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 61(12), pp. 936-957.
  21. Hambleton, R., 2013. Planning Systems and Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Policy, 3(4), pp. 397-418.
  22. Hanf, K., 2017. The implementation of regulatory policy: enforcement as bargaining. European Journal of Political Research, 10(3), pp. 159-172.
  23. Hill, M. & Hupe, P., 2014. Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. London: Sage.
  24. Jensen, C., Johansson, S. & Löfström, M., 2017. Policy implementation in the era of accelerating projectification: Synthesizing Matland’s conflict–ambiguity model and research on temporary organizations. Journals Public Policy and Administration, 33(4), pp. 447-465.
  25. John, P., 2016. Is there a life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions and punctuations: using evolutionary theory to explain policy change?. Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), pp. 481-498.
  26. Jones, C., 2014. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. California: Wadswort, Inc.
  27. Kementerian-Pertanian, 2010. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penyelamatan Sapi Betina Produktif. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan.
  28. Khan, A. R., 2016. Policy Implementation: Some Aspects and Issues. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 16(3), pp. 3-12.
  29. Khin, E. W. S., 2010. Comparative Study of the Budgeting Process Reforms Within Two International Accounting Organisations: Malaysia and Australia Perspectives. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(5), pp. 142-150.
  30. Kiewiet, D. & McCubbins, M., 2016. The logic of delegation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  31. Kiser, E., 2019. Comparing varieties of agency theory in economics, political science and sociology: an illustration from state policy implementation. Sociological Theory, 17(2), pp. 146-170.
  32. Lewis, J. & Flynn, R., 1978. The Implementation of Urban and Regional Policies: Final Report of a Feasibility Study for the Department of the Environment. London: s.n.
  33. Lipsky, M., 2010. Street-level bureaucracy (expanded edition). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  34. Marume, S. B. M., Mutongi, C. & Madziyire, N. C., 2016. An Analysis of Public Policy Implementation. Journal of Business and Management, 18(4), pp. 86-93.
  35. Matland, R., 2016. Synthesising the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), pp. 145-174.
  36. Nakamura, R. & Smallwood, F., 2017. The Policy Implementation. New York: St. Martin’s.
  37. Nuhung, I. A., 2018. Kinerja, Kendala dan Strategi Pencapaian Swasembada Daging Sapi. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 33(1), pp. 63-80.
  38. O’Toole, L., 2015. Rational choice and policy implementation: implications for interorganisational network management. American Review of Public Administration, 25(5), pp. 43-57.
  39. Parsan, R., 2015. Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Program NTB-BSS di Lombok Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 1(1), pp. 132-142.
  40. Paudel, N. R., 2019. Critical Account of Policy Implementation Theories: Status and Reconsideration. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 25(2), pp. 36-54.
  41. Payne, C., 2015. So much reform, so little change: the persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
  42. Pressman, J. L., 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. California: Univ of California Press.
  43. Priyanti, A., Inounu, I. & Ilham, N., 2017. Pencegahan Pemotongan Sapi Betina Produktif melalui Tata Kelola Lembaga Korporasi Perusahaan Daerah. Indonesian Bulletin of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 27(2), pp. 53-66.
  44. Pulzl, H. & Treib, O., 2017. Implementing Public policy. In F. Ficher et. al. (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
  45. Rasminati, N., Utomo, S. & Riyadi, D. A., 2009. Pemotongan Sapi Betina Produktif di Rumah Potong Hewan di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Sains Peternakan, 7(1), pp. 20-24.
  46. Ripley, R. B., 1985. Policy Analysis in Political Science. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publisher.
  47. Rubin, M. M. & Bartle, J. R., 2015. Integrating Gender into Government Budgets: A New Perspective. Public Administration Review, 65(3), pp. 259-272.
  48. Sabatier, P. A. & Mazmanian, D. A., 1983. Implementation and Public Policy. Chicago: Scott, Foresman and Co.
  49. Sabatier, P. & Jenkins-Smith, H., 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment’, in P. Sabatier (ed.). Theories of the Policy Process, pp. 117-168.
  50. Sabatier, P. & Mazmanian, D., 1979. The Conditions of Effective Implementation: A Guide to Accomplishing Policy Objectives. Policy analysis, 22(13), pp. 481-504.
  51. Schick, A., 2018. Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand’s Reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), pp. 123-131.
  52. Sepvionitta, L. B., 2014. Implementasi Program Penyelematan Sapi Betina Produktif pada Kelompok Ternak Sumber Makmur Desa Sumber Tanggul Kecamatan Mojosari Kabupaten Mojokerto. Jurnal Publika, 2(3), pp. 1-9.
  53. Smith, K. B. & Larimer, C. W., 2019. The public policy primer. Boulder: Westview Press.
  54. Stewart, J. J., Hedge, D. M. & Lester, J. P., 2018. Public policy: An evolutionary approach. Boston: Thomsom Wordsworth.
  55. Suggett, D., 2011. The implementation challenge: strategy is only as good as its execution. State Services Authority Occasional paper, Volume 15.
  56. Sunari, A., Avianto, N. & Ritinov, M. N., 2010. Strategi dan Kebijakan dalam Percepatan Pencapaian Swasembada Daging Sapi 2014 (Suatu Penelahaan Konkrit): Naskah Kebijakan (Policy Paper). Jakarta: Direktorat Pangan dan Pertanian Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
  57. Van Meter, D. S. & Van Horn, C. E., 1975. The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), pp. 445-488.
  58. Walliman, N. S. R., 2016. Research Methods: the basic. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  59. Weimer & Vining, 2016. Policy analysis. Boston: Longman.
  60. Winter, S., 2013. Implementation perspectives: status and reconsideration’, in G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds). London: Handbook of Public Administration.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>