Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the feasibility of the question items compiled by researchers for multiple choice tests on theme 3 "Caring for Living Things" grade IV elementary school. The feasibility of the question item in question is in terms of the validity of the question, the reliability of the question, the difficulty index of the question, the differentiability, and distractor effectiveness. This research is a descriptive research that is analyzed by quantitative methods. The subjects are grade IV students of SDN 2 Kertaraharja for the 2021/2022 academic year, totaling 40 students. Data collection technique with multiple choice test amounting to 20 items. The data obtained are analyzed with the help of the SPSS 25.0 program. The results showed that (1) The quality of the material aspects and construction aspects in the grain showed that the overall question item was very good. However, the language aspect still does not meet the criteria for writing indicators (2) The quality of the uji validity shows 90% of the items of the question are valid. (3) The reliability tested has an value r11 more than 0.70 i.e. 0.763 meaning the question of having high reliability; (4) The difficulty rate of 95% of the questions includes medium question criteria, 5% of difficult questions; (5) Thedifferentiator of the questions shows 95% of the questions are good and 5% are not good; (6) Ethe fecundity of the extractor indicates that 100% of the option is declared to have functioned effectively; and (7) Overall the quality of the question items is good but the question items number 16 and 19 are not good items.

Keywords

analysis grain of questions quality quantity

Article Details

Author Biography

Refa Tiwi Alia Fatin, PGSD, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Serang, Indonesia

Elementary School Teacher Study Program Indonesia University of Education Campus Serang

How to Cite
Fatin, R. T. A., Sekarsari Nurdini, Siti Farkhanah, & Bella Belinda. (2022). Analisis Butir Soal Tema 3 “Peduli Terhadap Makhluk Hidup” Kelas IV SDN 2 Kertaraharja Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.33369/dikdas.v5i2.21937

References

  1. Arifin, Z., 2016, Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur), Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi., 2012, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  3. Daryanto., 2012, Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
  4. Fahmi, D. A., & Hidayat, M. A., 2014. Korelasi Nilai Ulangan Harian, Nilai Ulangan Tengah Semester, Dan Nilai Ulangan Akhir Semester, Dengan Nilai Raport Semester Gasal Matematika Siswa Kelas Iv Sd Negeri 1 Bae Kudus. Malih Peddas (Majalah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar), 4(1), 20-28 https://doi.org/10.26877/malihpeddas.v4i1.525
  5. Fatimah, L. U., & Alfath, K., 2019, Analisis Kesukaran Soal, Daya Pembeda Dan Fungsi Distraktor. AL-MANAR: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 37-64.
  6. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H., 2012, How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education.
  7. Jurnal, R., 2018, Metode Kuantitatif Dengan Pendekatan Klasik Pada Aplikasi Analisis Butir Soal Sebagai Media Evaluasi Penentuan Soal Yang Berkualitas. Kilat, 7(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.33322/kilat.v7i1.104
  8. Munthe, A., 2015, Pentingnya Evaluasi Program di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 5(2), 1-14.
  9. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i2.p1-14
  10. Qomusuddin, I. F., 2019, Statistik pendidikan (Lengkap dengan aplikasi IMB SPSS Statistic 20.0). Deepublish
  11. Widoyoko, Eko Putro., 2015, Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.