Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 13, 2022
Accepted
August 3, 2022
Published
August 12, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 335 Download : 234

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Hoax becomes a social phenomenon that is formed and formed. This description causes hoaxes to operate in the social space. In the novel Dawuk Kisah Kelabu Dari Rumbuk Randu by Mahfud Ikhwan, hoaxes show that there is a structured effort that leads opinion to provocation. Rural social space becomes a possible field with many differences in capital in society. In this article will explore how hoax strategies in text narratives show rural social spaces that function to defend one's position. This study aims to show social space as a place for hoaxe’s formation. The method used is descriptive analysis method with the theory of Arena Pierre Bourdieu. The findings show that social space is used as a place of defense for a hoax-spreading agent named Warto Kemplung by using provocative language. The social space became the place where Warto Kemplung changed positions to influence the people in the village of Rumbuk Randu. The strategy with the latest topic language and the use of responsive language shows a picture of the production of oral speech as a language capital owned by Warto Kemplung. The existence of Warto Kemplung also shows the existence of village spaces and coffee shops as arenas in society as free fields anyone fill to maintain a position.

Keywords

hoaxes Dawuk Rumbuk Randu social space Bourdieu

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author Biography

Lily Tjahjandari, Department of Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia

Departement of Literature, Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia.
How to Cite
Nurafia, R., & Tjahjandari, L. (2022). Hoax narrative construction in the social space of rumbuk randu village in the Mahfud Ikhwan’s novel of Dawuk kisah kelabu dari rumbuk randu (2017). JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 7(2), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v7i2.21281
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Arisanty, M., Gunawan W, et. al. (2021). Pengujian Konstruk Motif Sikap Penerimaan dan Perilaku Membagikan Kembali Informasi Hoaks dalam Media Sosial [Testing the Construct of Acceptance Attitudes and Behavior of Re-sharing Hoax Information in Social Media}. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media, 25 (2), 171-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.4366
  2. Ayomi, PN. (2021). Gosip, Hoaks, dan Perempuan: Representasi dan Resepsi Khalayak Terhadap Film “Tilik”[ Gossip, Hoaks, and Women: Public Representation and Reception of the Film "Tilik"]. Rekam: Jurnal Fotografi, Televisi, Animasi, 17 (1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.24821/rekam.v17i1.4910
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field Of Culture Production. Randal Johnson, ed. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Physical Space, Social Space and Habitus. Oslo, Norwegia: University of Oslo.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1996). Physical space, social space and habitus. Vilhelm Aubert Memorial lecture, Report, 10, 87-101.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (2020). Bahasa dan Kekuasaan Simbolik [Language and Symbolic Power]. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD
  7. Buwana, T.S., & Irmawati, F. (2020). Pembunuhan Karakter Lewat Gosip di Kalangan Ibu-Ibu Pedesaan: Analisis Naratif Struktur Narasi Fil Pendek “Tilik”[ Character Assassination Through Gossip Among Rural Mothers: Narrative Analysis of the Narrative Structure of the Short Film “Tilik”]. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3 (2), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.33005/jkom.V3i2.103.
  8. Didipu, H. (2018). Struktur Naratif Novel Osakat Anak Asmat Karya Ani Sekarningsih (Perspektif Naratologi Gard Genette) [The Narrative Structure of the Novel Osakat Anak Asmat by Ani Sekarningsih (Gard Genette's Narrative Perspective)]. Jurnal Aksara,1(9),15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/aksara/v19i1.pp15-27
  9. Field, J. (2010). Modal Sosial [Social Capital]. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
  10. Fitri, Chairil E, dan Martono. (2016). Dwilogi Saman: Sebuah Kajian Struktur Naratif [Dwilogi Saman: A Study of Narrative Structure]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa,5(9),1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v5i9.16602
  11. Hendra. (2020). Bahasa Dalam Trinitas Suci Pierre Bourdieu [The Language of the Holy Trinity by Pierre Bourdieu}. ETNOREFLIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial &Budaya, 9(2), 141-150. http://doi.org/10.33772/etnoreflika.v9i2.868.
  12. Hidayati, N., Hairil E & Christanto Syam. (2016). Struktur Naratif Novel Daun Yang Jatuh Tak Pernah Membenci Angin Karya Tere Liye [The Narrative Structure of Tere Liye's Novel Falling Leaves Never Hates the Wind]. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 5 (7), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v5i7.15871.
  13. Idris, IA. (2018). Klarifikasi Al-Quran Atas Berita Hoaks [Al-Quran Clarification on Hoax News]. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia
  14. Ikhwan, M. (2017). Dawuk Kisah Kelabu Dari Rumbuk Randu. Tangerang Selatan: Marjin Kiri.
  15. Juditha, C. (2018). Interaksi Komunikasi Hoax di Media Sosial serta Antisipasinya Hoax Communication Interactivity in Social Media and Anticipation [Hoax Communication Interactivity in Social Media and Anticipation of Hoax Communication Interactivity in Social Media and Anticipation]. Jurnal Pekommas, 3 (1), 31-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2018.2030104
  16. Karnanta, KY (2018). Paradigma Teori Arena Produksi Kultural Sastra: Kajian Terhadap Pemikiean Pierre Bourdieu [). Paradigm Theory of Cultural Literary Production Arena: A Study of Pierre Bourdieu's Thoughts]. Jurnal Poetika,1(1), 3-15 https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i1.10420
  17. Kompas.com. (2017, November 10). Budaya Nongkrong di Kedai Kopi yang Tidak Pernah Pudar [ The Culture of Hanging Out in Coffee Shops That Never Fades]. Retrivied from http://lifestyle.kompas.com/read/2017/11/10/Kulture-nongkrong-di-kedai-kopi-yang-tak-pernah-pudar. Accessed on January 26, 2022.
  18. Luthfia, AR. (2013). Menilik Urgensi Desa di Era Otonomi Daerah [Observing the Urgency of the Village in the Era of Regional Autonomy]. Journal Of Rural And Development, IV (2), 135-143. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/rural-and-development/article/view/1858.
  19. Marwa, A., & Fadhlan, M. (2021). Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial Menurut Perspektif Islam [Hate Speech on Social Media from an Islamic Perspective]. Journal for Islamic Studies, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31943/afkarjournal.v4i1.140
  20. Ratna, NK. (2013). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra [Theory, Methods, and Techniquest Literary Research]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  21. Silalahi, Rut R, Puri B & Windhi TS. (2017). Karakteristik Strategi CrowDsourcing Untuk Membatasi Penyebaran Hoaks di Indonesia [Characteristics of CrowDsourcing Strategy to Limit the Spread of Hoax in Indonesia]. MetaCommunication: Journal Of Communications Studies, 2 (2), 128-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/mc.v2i2.4090.
  22. Sulastri, Nfn. “Ajo Sidi Pembual”, Identitas Diri sebagai “Mesin Pembedaan” Keminangan: Analisis Kajian Budaya.[“Ajo Sidi Pembual", Self-Identity as a "Machine of Distinction" Interests: Analysis of Cultural Studies]. Jurnal Mabasan, 4(1). http://doi.org/10.26499/mab.v4i1.188.
  23. Pellegrini, L. A. (2008). An argument for the criminal hoax. University of Southern California.
  24. Wardani, MMS. (2017). Manipulasi bahasa dalam teror kabar bohong [The manipulation of language in the terror of hoaxes]. Makalah seminar, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta, 26 April. Received from https://www.usd.ac.id/fakultas/sastra/sasing/f1l3/Dies%2024/Manusia%20Bahasa%20dalam%20Teror%20Hoax. Pdf
  25. Zidane, A., & Rettob, F. (2020). Dinamika Persebaran Hoax Sebagai Tantangan Pemerintah Di Indonesia [ The Dynamics of the Spread of Hoax as a Challenge for the Government in Indonesia]. Prosiding Simposium Nasional''Tantangan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan di Era Revolusi Indusri 4. O", 1273-1290. https://doi.org/10.22219/PSNIP.Vol0.No0.III|1273-1290