Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 28, 2022
Accepted
February 11, 2022
Published
February 18, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 405 Download : 506

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article reports on a narrative case study that showcases the local English teachers’ perceived inequality practices and identity construction in Indonesia’s micro-reality context of a private language school domain. Grounded in the social theory of power, privilege, and positional identities, three synchronous online interviews were conducted to explore the LETs voices about what it means to experience the equality of rights and obligations in the workplace. As a result, the study revealed four inequality issues: (1) dissatisfaction with the payroll system, (2) the representation of gender and race in promotional endorsement, (3) the call for decolonizing pedagogy in ELT materials and resources, and (4) perceived identity as legitimate and qualified English teachers. Regarding the workload capacity and role as professional English teachers, they recognized that they deserve equal treatment as their native counterparts. However, this type of discrimination will further widen the gap between LETs and NESTs dichotomy and impede the construction of language teacher identity. This study suggests exploring dedicated strategies to develop information literacy skills for school principals, parents, teachers, students, and policymakers. This study will also contribute to the growth of critically oriented literature and scholarship on teacher identity and critical anti-racist language teaching pedagogy.

Keywords

LETs Glocal pedagogy Marginalization Legitimate English teachers Teacher identity

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Nur, S., Anas, I., Pilu, R., & Basri, N. (2022). Local English teachers’ voices from a marginalized lens: Inequality practices and identity construction in the workplace. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v7i1.20418
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akiyoshi, A. (2010). Questioning the Rationale for Native Speakers Only in Hiring Practice : From Parents ’ Perspective. Polyglossia, 19, 13–25. http://en.apu.ac.jp/rcaps/uploads/fckeditor/publications/polyglossia/Polyglossia_V19_Akiyoshi.pdf
  2. Atamturk, N., Atamturk, H., & Dimililer, C. (2018). Native speaker dichotomy: Stakeholders’ preferences and perceptions of native and non-native speaking English language teachers. South African Journal of Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1384
  3. Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002
  4. Barratt, L., & Kontra, E. H. (2000). Native-English-speaking teachers in cultures other than their own. TESOL Journal, 9(3), 19–23.
  5. Bayyurt, Y. (2018). Equity and Inclusivity for NESTs and NNESTs. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (First Edit, pp. 1–6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research a practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/21156
  8. Chen, G. A., Horn, I. S., & Nolen, S. B. (2018). Engaging Teacher Identities in Teacher Education: Shifting Notions of the “Good Teacher” to Broaden Teachers’ Learning. In P. A. Schutz, J. Hong, & D. C. Francis (Eds.), Research on teacher identity:mapping challenges and innovations (pp. 85–95). Springer.
  9. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). SAGE.
  10. Elyas, T., & Alghofaili, N. M. (2019). Native English Speakers Versus Non-Native English Speakers: the Impact of Language Teachers on Efl Learner’S English Proficiency. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1773
  11. Fithriani, R. (2018). Discrimination Behind Nest and Nnest Dichotomy in ELT Pofesionalism. The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature Volume, 741–755. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1982
  12. Gagné, A., Herath, S., & Valencia, M. (2018). Exploring privilege and marginalization in elt: A trioethnography of three diverse educators. In B. Yazan & N. Rudolph (Eds.), Criticality, Teacher Identity, and (In)equity in English Language Teaching (Vol. 35, pp. 237–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72920-6_13
  13. Holland, D., Lachicotte Jr, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Harvard University Press.
  14. Holliday, A. (2015). Native-speakerism: Taking the Concept Forward and Achieving Cultural Belief. In A. Swan, P. Aboshiha, & A. Holliday (Eds.), (En)Countering Native-speakerism: Global Perspectives (pp. 11–25). Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Jenkins, J. (2006). Current Perspectives on Teaching World Englishes and English as a Lingua Franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 157–181.
  16. Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes. Routledge:Taylor & Francis Group.
  17. Kubota, R., & Lin, A. (2006). Race and TESOL: Introduction to Concepts and Theories. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 471. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264540
  18. Lee, Y., & Cho, H. (2015). Promoting Collaborative Teaching between NESTs and NNESTs in English Classrooms. Studies in English Education, 20(1).
  19. Lin, T. Bin, Wang, L. Y., & Wang, M. Y. (2018). Diverse interpretations on nativeness but unanimous subscription to native-speakerism: Identity of future non-native English teachers in Taiwan. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.3.603
  20. Ma, L. P. F. (2012). Strengths and weaknesses of NESTs and NNESTs: Perceptions of NNESTs in Hong Kong. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.005
  21. Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. . (1994). The feminist classroom.
  22. Mannion, G. (2015). Towards glocal pedagogies: some risks associated with education for global citizenship and how global pedagogies might avoid them. In J. Friedman, V. Haverkate, B. Oomen, E. Park, & M. Sklad (Eds.), Going Glocal in Higher Education: the theory, teaching and measurement of global citizenship. University College Roosevelt.
  23. Medgyes, P. (1992). Native or non-native: Who’s worth more? ELT Journal, 46(4), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/46.4.340
  24. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). SAGE.
  25. Mullock, B. (2003). What makes a good teacher? The perceptions of postgraduate TESOL students. Prospect, 18(3), 3–24. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.132500
  26. Mullock, B. (2010). Does a Good Language Teacher have to be a Native Speaker? In A. Mahboob (Ed.), The NNEST Lens: Non Native English Speakers in TESOL. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  27. O’Connor, H., & Madge, C. (2017). Online Interviewing. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods (2nd Editio, pp. 416–434). SAGE.
  28. Pérez Huber, L., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Racial microaggressions as a tool for critical race research. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(3), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.994173
  29. Ramjattan, V. A. (2017). Racist nativist microaggressions and the professional resistance of racialized English language teachers in Toronto. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377171
  30. Ramjattan, V. A. (2019). The white native speaker and inequality regimes in the private English language school. Intercultural Education, 30(2), 126–140.
  31. Rudolph, N. (2018). Agency and Marginalization. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (First Edit, pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  32. Rudolph, N., Selvi, A. F., & Yazan, B. (2015). Conceptualizing and Confronting Inequity: Approaches Within and New Directions for the “NNEST Movement.” Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(1), 27–50.
  33. Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2018). Identity-Agency in Progress: Teachers Authoring Their Identities. In P. A. Schutz, J. Hong, & D. C. Francis (Eds.), Research on teacher identity:mapping challenges and innovations (pp. 25–36). Springer.
  34. Sung, C. C. M. (2011). Race and native speakers in ELT: Parents’ perspectives in Hong Kong. English Today, 27(3), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078411000344
  35. Swan, A., Aboshiha, P., & Holliday, A. (2015). (En)Countering Native-speakerism: Global Perspectives. In (En)Countering Native-speakerism. Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The Ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438
  37. Widodo, H. P., Fang, F., & Elyas, T. (2020). The construction of language teacher professional identity in the Global Englishes territory: ‘we are legitimate language teachers.’ Asian Englishes, 00(00), 1–8.
  38. Wong, C.-Y. (2009). Are native speakers “good” language instructors? A case study of untrained ESL tutors. Arecls, 6, 122–140.
  39. Yazan, B., & Rudolph, N. (2018). Criticality, Teacher Identity, and (In)equity in English Language Teaching: Issues and Implications (Vol. 35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72920-6
  40. Zacharias, N. T., & Manara, C. (2013). Contextualizing the pedagogy of English as an international language: issues and tensions. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.