Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 12, 2023
Published
August 22, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 403 Download : 264

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess students' writing abilities using dictogloss and blogging. It involved 24 students from vocational colleges and incorporated five audio scripts from Hughes and Naunton's "Students Book of Business Results (Intermediate)" (2008). It employed a mixed method in the form of a quasi-experimental. The data was acquired using questionnaires and interviews. The students were divided into two groups: half were assigned to the control group, while the other half were assigned to the experimental group, which received training while the control group did not. The experimental group achieved a score of 59, whereas the control group achieved an average score of 41. Future research should look in depth at how creatively tertiary vocational college students think, especially through listening activities.

Keywords

Business English Collaborative Learning mixed method communication skills student engagement

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Sri Hardiningsih, Elizabeth Anggraeni Amalo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author Biography

Sri Hardiningsih, Politeknik Negeri Semarang

Department of Accounting

How to Cite
Amalo, E. A., & Hardiningsih, S. (2023). The impact of dictogloss and blogging on EFL students’ writing skills in an Indonesian tertiary vocational college. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v8i2.26857
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bista, K. (2015). Is Twitter an effective pedagogical tool in higher education? Perspectives of education graduate students. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15 (2), 83–102. https://doi.org/ 10.14434/josotl. v15i2.12825
  2. Brown, P. C. (2001, November). Interactive dictation. Paper presentation at the annual conference of the Japan Association for Language Teaching, Kokura.
  3. Collins, L. (2007). L1 differences and L2 similarities: Teaching verb tenses in English. English Language Teaching Journal, 61(4), 295-303. https://doi. org/10.1093/elt/ccm048
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Brown, M. L. (1994). Research design: Quantitative & qualitative approaches. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(96) 70054-7
  5. Dikilitaş, K., & Yaylı, D. (2018). Teachers’ professional identity development through action research. ELT Journal, 72(4), 415–424. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/elt/ccy027
  6. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. (1998). Development in English for specific purposes: A multidisciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906 (99) 00026-5
  7. Efimova, L., & de Moor, A. (2005). Beyond personal webpublishing: An exploratory study of conversational blogging practices. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.118
  8. Enache, R., & Crisan, A. (2013). The impact of collaborative learning using new informational technologies on personality development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 76, 327–335. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.122
  9. Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05348.x
  10. Flatley, M. E. (2005). Blogging for enhanced teaching and learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 68(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056 990506800111
  11. Goraca-Sawczyk, G. (2015). Using blogs for language teaching and learning. Glottodidactica: An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2013.40.2.7
  12. Hughes, J., & Naunton, J. (2008). Business result intermediate: Student’s book. Oxford University Press.
  13. Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2001). Paradigm shift: Understanding and implementing change in second language education. TESL-EJ, 5(1). http://www.kyotosu.ac.jp/ information/tesl-ej/ej17/toc.html.
  14. Jacobs, G., & Small, J. (2003). Combining dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The Reading Matrix, 3(1). https://doi.org /10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091
  15. de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858–1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
  16. Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs pro.2011.12.091.
  17. Mehdiabadi, F. (2014). The effectiveness of collaborative output task of dictogloss in enhancing EFL learners’ emotional intelligence. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(6). https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/271712632. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i6.6804
  18. Pinkman, K. (2005). Using blogs in the foreign language classroom: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT Journal, 1(1), 12-24.
  19. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5
  20. Vasiljevic, Z. (2010). Dictogloss as an alternative method of teaching listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 3(1). www.ccsenet. org/elt.
  21. Vygotsky, L.S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  22. Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford University Press.
  23. Wells, L. (2006). Blog it: An innovative way to improve literacy. Reading Today, 24(1), 40.
  24. Wolvin, A. D., & Coakley, C. G. (1996). Listening (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.