Main Article Content

Abstract

Recent development in second language acquisition scholarship has advanced our understanding of how language is acquired by aligning the mind, body, and socio-material world.  Although many studies have been conducted from this perspective, more study on alignment focusing on writing a play script story in literature is needed. Drawing upon the idea of socio-cognitive alignment, this study investigated English literature student interactions during the process of writing a play script. It aims were to find out
how mind-body-world as socio-cognitive alignment could contribute to a meaning-making process during writing a play script.
A moment analysis was used as a method for analyzing data which were elicited from an audio/videotape recording and semi-structured interviews using a digital platform.  Results revealed that the integration of mind, body, and world was well-coordinated during the process of writing the play script. That is, the integration of mind-body-world was evident in how the students employed both verbal resources and other multimodalities in working with literary works and fiction. The study also demonstrated the importance of alignment and interaction for the development of fiction writing and language competence of EFL students.

Keywords

play script story second language acquistion sociocognitive alignment mind-body-world moment analysis

Article Details

How to Cite
Sagimin, E. M., & Sugiharto, S. (2023). Alignment and embodiment in a play script writing process: A sociocognitive perspective. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v8i2.27430

References

  1. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second Llanguage acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00159
  2. Atkinson, D. (2010a). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq009
  3. Atkinson, D. (2010b). f i not rst p roo for fs dis trib utio n APPROACH TO SECOND f i not rst p roo for fs dis trib utio n. 143–166.
  4. Atkinson, D. (2012). Cognitivism, adaptive intelligence, and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0010
  5. Atkinson, D. (2014). Language learning in mindbodyworld: A sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 47(4), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000153
  6. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00539.x
  7. Canagarajah, S. (2018a). English as a spatial resource and the claimed competence of Chinese STEM professionals. World Englishes, 37(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12301
  8. Canagarajah, S. (2018b). Materializing ‘Competence’: Perspectives From International STEM Scholars. Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12464
  9. Canagarajah, S. (2018c). Translingual Practice as Spatial Repertoires: Expanding the Paradigm beyond Structuralist Orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041
  10. Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and Mind. In Language and Mind. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511791222
  11. Churchill, E., Okada, H., Nishino, T., & Atkinson, Dw. (2010). Symbiotic gesture and the sociocognitive visibility of grammar in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 234–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01019.x
  12. Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). file:///C:/Users/Harrison/Downloads/John W. Creswell & J. David Creswell - Research Design_ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2018).pdf%0Afile:///C:/Users/Harrison/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Creswell, Cr
  13. Gobbi, A. (2019). Towards a Sociocognitive Second Language Education: a theoretical framework of reference.
  14. Kim, Y., & Michel, M. (2023). Linguistic alignment in second language acquisition: A methodological review. System, February, 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103007
  15. Levy, E. S., Strange, W., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (Oxford Applied Linguistics) by Zoltán Dörnyei (z-lib.org).pdf. In Journal of Phonetics (Vol. 36, Issue 1, p. 336).
  16. Nishino, T., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Second language writing as sociocognitive alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.002
  17. Ortega, L. (2011). SLA after the social turn: Where cognitivismi and its alternatives stand. In Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition.
  18. Sugiharto, S. (2015). Translingualism in action: Rendering the impossible possible. Journal of Asia TEFL, 12(2), 125–154.
  19. Sugiharto, S. (2016). Comprehensible Input as Sociocognitive Alignment: A Response to Cho and Krashen (2016). Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.32959/tojelt.229323
  20. Suroso, S. (2015). Drama: Teori dan Praktik Pementasan. In Elmatera Publisher. Elmatera Publisher.
  21. Uzum, B. (2011). An investigation of alignment in CMC from a sociocognitive perspective. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.1.135-155
  22. Wei, L. (2011). Moment Analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1222–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035