Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 25, 2023
Accepted
September 15, 2023
Published
October 1, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 352 Download : 203

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article presents a study focusing on using Digital Mind Mapping (DMM) by students to develop a business plan concept and enhance their ability to plan and organize a new business roadmap. In line with the task-based language teaching approach and Ellis's framework for designing task-based lessons, the study investigates the students' practices of creating meaning and their reflections on using DMM. The research consists of three main stages: pre-task, during-the-task, and post-task activities. Twenty-three students enrolled in a Business English course participated in the study, and qualitative data, including business plan diagrams, student-created business plans, and reflection sheets, were collected and analyzed. The findings reveal that the students reflected positively on their experience with DMM, as the task stimulated their active participation, exploration, autonomy, and engagement throughout the writing process. This study contributes to the existing literature on task-based language teaching by examining the effectiveness of Digital Mind Mapping in facilitating students' business planning and organizational skills. Additionally, it provides insights into exploring the long-term impact of utilizing DMM in various language learning contexts and investigates potential strategies for optimizing its implementation in business English courses.

Keywords

DMM Business Plan Writing Pedagogy Technology-Mediated Task

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Farida Amansyah, Sahril Nur, Ismail Anas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Amansyah, F., Nur, S., & Anas, I. (2023). Digital mind mapping as a pedagogical tool to support the student’s business plan writing performance. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 433–453. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v8i2.27757
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abd Karim, R., Mohd Tahir, M. H., & Mohd Adnan, A. H. (2020). Bubbl.us: a digital mind-mapping tool to promote a mobile-based technology approach in writing courses. In U. Kusmawan, S. Aisyah, I. Rokhiyah, Andayani, D. R. Jovanka, & D. Sukmayadi (Eds.), Emerging Perspectives and Trends in Innovative Technology for Quality Education 4.0 (pp. 231–235). Taylor & Francis.
  2. Abd Karim, R., & Mustapha, R. (2020). Students ’ Perception on the Use of Digital Mind Map to Stimulate Creativity and Critical Thinking in ESL Writing Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7596–7606. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082545
  3. Al-Jarf, R. (2014). Social Networks and Creative Writing in EFL. In Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis (pp. 144–168). Hershey, PA:IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4426-7.ch007
  4. Anas, I., Basri, M., Musdariah, A., & Anas, R. (2021). Teaching speaking online using digital mind mapping software (DMMS) and screen recording tool (SRT): A practical method. 18th International Conference of the Asia Association of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (AsiaCALL–2-2021), 621, 182–187.
  5. Bani-Hani, N. a., Al-Sobh, M. a., & Abu-Melhim, A.-R. H. (2014). Utilizing Facebook Groups in Teaching Writing: Jordanian EFL Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n5p27
  6. Barrot, J. S. (2021). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
  7. Basel, B. (2004). Some reflections on the use of English as a medium of instruction in the Ikhwelo Project. Language Matters, 35(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228190408566223
  8. Deane, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowles, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens-Tatum, J. (2008). Cognitive Models of Writing: Writing Proficiency as a Complex Integrated Skill. In ETS Research Report Series. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02141.x
  9. Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining the impact of Grammarly on the quality of mobile L2 writing. The JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 74–92.
  10. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.
  11. Ellis, R. (2006). The Methodology of Task-Based Teaching. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 19–45.
  12. Evans, V. (2016). Writing a Business Plan:How to Win Backing to Start up or Grow Your Business. Pearson Education.
  13. Evrekli, E., Inel, D., & Balim, A. G. (2010). Development of a scoring system to assess mind maps. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2330–2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.331
  14. González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks. John Benjamin Publishing Company.
  15. Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Education Limited.
  16. Hermansson, C., & Lindgren, E. (2019). Writing As A Cognitive Process. World Of Better Learning: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2019/12/19/writing-cognitive-process/
  17. Huber, M. M., Leach-López, M. A., Lee, E., & Mafi, S. L. (2020). Improving accounting student writing skills using writing circles. Journal of Accounting Education, 53, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100694
  18. Kadagidze, L. (2016). Mind Mapping as a Teaching Tool in Higher Education Language Learning Settings. In J. Piechowiak-Lamparska (Ed.), Kultura i Edukacja (Vol. 4, Issue 114, pp. 78–88). Kultura i Edukacja.
  19. Kafipour, R., Mahmoudi, E., & Khojasteh, L. (2018). The effect of task-based language teaching on analytic writing in EFL classrooms. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496627
  20. Lan, Y., Sung, Y.-T., Cheng, C.-C., & Chang, K.-E. (2015). Computer-Supported Cooperative Prewriting for Enhancing Young Learners’ Writing Performance. Language Learning & Teachnology, 19(2), 134–155.
  21. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. In Applied Linguistics (Vol. 28, Issue 3). Oxford University Press.
  22. Lentz, P. (2013). MBA Students’ Workplace Writing: Implications for Business Writing Pedagogy and Workplace Practice. Business Communication Quarterly, 76(4), 474 –490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569913507479
  23. Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: an analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981
  24. Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
  25. Manning, S. J., & Jobbitt, T. (2018). Engaged and interactive peer review : Introducing peer review circles. RELC Journal, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218791832
  26. May, G. L., Thompson, M. A., & Hebblethwaite, J. (2012). A Process for Assessing and Improving Business Writing at the MBA Level. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(3), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569912441822
  27. Muller-Hartmann, A., & Ditfurth, M. S. (2010). Research on the Use of Technology in Task-Based Language Teaching. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology (pp. 17–40). Continuum.
  28. Nast, J. (2006). Idea Mapping: How to Access Your Hidden Brain Power, Learn Faster, Remember More, and Achieve Success in Business. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  29. Nur, S., Anas, I., & Rahayu. (2022). Engaging Novice Writers in Online Collaborative Review through Peer- Review Circles. 6(1), 63–74.
  30. O’Looney, J. A., Glynn, S. M., Britton, B. K., & Mattocks, L. F. (1989). Cognition and Writing: The Idea Generation Process. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 305–321). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_18
  31. Pea, R. D., & Kurland, D. M. (1987). Cognitive Technologies for Writing. In E. Z.Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 14, pp. 277–327). AERA. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X014001277
  32. Pfotenhauer, V. (1982). Brainstorming as a Prewriting Activity. Childhood Education, 59(2), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1982.10520558
  33. Reeder, K. (2010). Edubba: Real-World Writing Tasks in a Virtual World. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology (pp. 176–196). Continuum.
  34. Roy, D. (2017). Task-based EFL language teaching with procedural information design in a technical writing context. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1264174
  35. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in Second Language Pedagogy. In Tasks in Second Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429_5
  36. Spiller, D. (2009). Assessment: Feedback to promote student learning. In Teaching Development Unit (pp. 1–19). The University of Waikato.
  37. Talbot, F. (2009). How to Write Effective Business English. Kogan Page.
  38. Thomas, M., & Reinders, H. (2010). Deconstructing Tasks and Technology. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology (p. 263). Continuum.
  39. Van Den Branden, K. (2016). The Role of Teachers in Task-Based Language Education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(2016), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000070
  40. Whitmell, C. (2014). Business Writing Essentials: How to Write Letters, Reports and Emails (Kindle Edi).
  41. Xu, Z., Banerjee, M., Ramirez, G., Zhu, G., & Wijekumar, K. (Kay). (2019). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on adult English language learners’ writing quality: a meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1–2), 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1501069
  42. Zhang, D. (2009). The Application of Blog in English Writing. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4(1), 64–72.
  43. Zhu, W. (2004). Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment
  44. types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00046-7