Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 1, 2023
Accepted
August 14, 2023
Published
October 3, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 259 Download : 150

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims at developing high school English learning modules based on Bugis culture. This research applied Development Design Research (DDR) approach and involved several parties related to the development of the EMBOS module, namely high school English teachers and experts. Data were collected by using Focus Group Discussion. The data were analyzed qualitatively using the N-VIVO software, and the quantitative data were analyzed using the Fuzzy Delphi and Aiken's V methods. Needs analysis using the Group Interview method or Focus Group Discussion resulted in several issues or themes. The results of expert approval using the Fuzzy Delphi method found that the Mappadendang topic received approval in the song/narrative material with a Threshold (d) value of 0.038 and an average of Fuzzy Number 0.787. The topic of Mappadinding received approval on the Explanation Text/ Description Text material with a Threshold (d) value of 0.038 and an average fuzzy number of 0.787. Nene Malomo's topic on Traditional Story/Narrative Text/Reading Comprehension material with a Threshold (d) value of 0.038 and an average of Fuzzy Number 0.787. Developing an English learning module based on Bugis Local Wisdom consists of the beginning, content and the end. Experts have validated the EMBOS module. The results of expert validation indicate that this module is generally suitable for use in learning English at the high school level or equivalent. An English learning module based on Bugis local wisdom can be implemented as an alternative to bring students closer to their environment or contextual learning.

Keywords

Bugis Culture English Local wisdom

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mujahidah, Wahyu Hidayat, Muhammad Zuhri Dj, Ishak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Mujahidah, Hidayat, W., Dj, M. Z., & Ishak. (2023). Development of an English module based on Bugis’ local wisdom. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 8(2), 454–487. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v8i2.27894
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmadi, Iif Khoiru. Et al., (2012). Mengembangkan Pendidikan Berbasis Keunggulan Lokal dalam KTSP. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka.
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, pp. 27, 1–52.
  3. Aiken, L. R., & Marnat, G. G. (2008). Psychological Testing and Assessment. USA: Allyn and Bacon.
  4. Akinnuwesi, B.A., Uzoka, F.M.E. (2009). A Framework of Web-Based Fuzzy Expert System for Managing Tourism Information, Georgian Electronic Scientific Journal: Computer Science and Telecommunications, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 77-89.
  5. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  6. Ash, K. (2012). Educators evaluate 'flip classrooms'; benefits and drawbacks seen in replacing lectures with on-demand video: Education Week, 32 (02).
  7. Asmani, J.M., (2012). Pendidikan Berbasis Keunggulan Lokal. Jogjakarta: Diva Press.
  8. Avella, J. R. (2016). Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 305-321.
  9. Azrilah A.A., Mohd Saidfudin M. & Azami Z. (2013). Asas Model Pengukuran Rasch: Pembentukan Skala dan Struktur Pengukuran. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
  10. Berns, R.G. & Erickson, P.M. (2001). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. Career and Technical Educational Technology 05, 2001, 1–9.
  11. Boonon, K. (1979). The future of teacher education in Thailand: a Delphi application (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama.
  12. Bond, T. & Fox, C.M. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Edisi Ke-3. New York: Routledge.
  13. Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, Melissa S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. London: Springer.
  14. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess High¬er Order Thinking Skills in Your Class¬room. Alexandria: ASCD.
  15. Chang, P., Hsu, C., & Chang, P. (2020). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045.
  16. Choudhury, R. (2014). The Role of Culture in Teaching and Learning of English The Role of Culture in Teaching and Learning of English. Express, An International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research, 1(4), 1-20
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
  18. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  19. Damayanti, I. K. P., & Mundilarto. (2017). Pengembangan model outdoor learning melalui project berbasis local wisdom pada pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 4(2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v4i1.10111.
  20. Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, USA: Scott, Foresman and Compan
  21. Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, pp. 862-864.
  22. Dick. W, Carey. L. Carey. JO (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Addison-Wesley Educational Publisher Inc.
  23. Education First. (2018). the 8th edition of the EF English Proficiency Index Report.
  24. Effandi Zakaria & Abd Razak Habib. (2006). Kesan pembelajaran Kooperatif ke atas pelajar matrikulasi dalam mata pelajaran matematik. Journal Teknologi, 45(E). Dis. 2006: 43-62, UKM.
  25. Ramdani, E. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Sebagai Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 10 (1, 1-10
  26. Fisher, A., (2011). Critical thinking: An introduction. Cambridge University Press, United Kindom.
  27. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate education research (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  28. Gagne, Robert M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C & Keller, J.M (2005). Principles of Instructional Design (5th edition) California: Thomson Wadsworth.
  29. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Retrieved from the Flipped Learning Network, 19/3/2014, http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/ Centricity/Domain/41/LitReview_FlippedLearning.pdf
  30. Heinich, R., Molenda, M. and Russell, J.D. (1991). Instructional Media and Technologies of Instruction (4th ed.) New York: MacMillan Publisher Ltd
  31. Herimanto dan Winarno. (2011). Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya Dasar. Jakarta Timur : Bumi Aksara.
  32. Hidayat, Wahyu & Lawahid, Nurasmawati. (2020). Metode Fuzzy Delphi Untuk Penelitian Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  33. Hidaya, W., Mulianah, S., & Mujahidah. (2019) “Analysis of The National Character Senior High School Students by Using Rasch Model,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Religion and Education, pp. 1–9.
  34. Johnson, E. B. (2012). Contextual teaching and learning: What and why it is here to stay. California: Corwin Press
  35. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Insturmen B1Penilaian Buku Pengayaan Pengetahuan, http://puskurbuk.net/web13/, 2 Agustus, 2021.
  36. Kenna, DC (2014). A Study of The Effect of The Flipped Classroom Model on Student Self-Efficacy A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Donald Christian Kenna In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree. North Dakota State University
  37. Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1994). Designing Effective Instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
  38. King, F., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2011). Higher order thinking skills: Definitions, strategies, assessment. Centre for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
  39. Kleanthous, I. (2009). Foundation of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Book Review. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 32(2): 231–232.
  40. Komalasari, K. (2010). Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Konsep dan Aplikasi). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
  41. Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  42. Kresno S, Ella Nurlaela H, Endah Wuryaningsih, Iwan Ariawan. (1999). Aplikasi Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Penyakit Menular, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Indonesia bekerja sama dengan Direktorat Jenderal Pemberantasan Penyakit Menular dan Penyehatan Lingkungan Pemukiman Depkes RI. Jakarta.
  43. Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A Typology of Mixed Methods Research Design, Quality & Quantity 43(2): 265-275.
  44. Liu, X. (2011). A Thesis: The Effect of Cultural Background on ESL College Students’ Performance on Reading Comprehension and Recall of Culturally Oriented Texts. USA: Texas Tech University.
  45. Mahdi, Asaad, et al. (2011). Comparison of Fuzzy Diagnosis with K-Nearest Neighbour and Naive Bayes Classifiers in Disease Diagnosis, Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 58-66.
  46. Malagoli, Stefano, Magni, Carlo Aberto. (2007). The Use of Fuzzy Logic and Expert Systems for Rating and Pricing Firm, Managerial Finance, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 836-852.
  47. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press.
  48. Meijering, J. V., Tobi, H., & Kampen, J.K. (2013). Quantifying the development of agreement among experts in Delphi studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(80), 1607-1614.
  49. Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan/Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan.
  50. Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Penilaian Buku Non Teks Pelajaran, (http://puskurbuk.net/web13/). 4 Agustus 2021.
  51. Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it, and how can it best be used? Distance Learning,9(3), 85. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu
  52. Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman & Johnny Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  53. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement 42(5): 34–37.
  54. Molenda, Heinich, R., Russell, J. D & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional media and Technologies for Learning. Seventh Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  55. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Designing Effective Instruction. Ed. ke-6. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  56. Muslich, M. (2007). KTSP pembelajaran berbasis kompetensi dan kontekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  57. Nashir, H. (2013). Pendidikan Karakter berbasis Agama dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Multi Presendo.
  58. Nessel, D. D., & Graham, J.M. (2007). Thinking Strategies for student achievement: improving learning across the Curriculum, K-12. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press. A SAGE Publication Company
  59. Ningrum, E., Nandi dan Sungkawa, D. (2017). The Impact of Local Wisdom-Based Learning Model on Students’ Understanding of The Land Ethic. 1st UPI International Geography Seminar IOP Publishing, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 145 (2018) 012086 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012086.
  60. Noah, S. M., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan & Modul Akademik. 1st. ed. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
  61. Nurhadi, Yasin, B., & Senduk, A. G. (2004). Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning/ CTL) dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
  62. Nuraeni & Alfan, M. (2013). Studi Budaya di Indonesia. Bandung : CV Pustaka Setia.
  63. OECD. (2016). PISA 2006 Results: What students know and can do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. Paris: PISA-OECD Publishing.
  64. Ormrod, J. (2003). Educational psychology: developing learners. New Jersey, Person Education Inc.
  65. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan, http://www.telkomuniversity.ac.id 9 Januari 2020.
  66. Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Instructional design and assessment: Vodcasts and active learning exercises in a “flipped classroom” model of a renal pharmacotherapy module. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 1–5. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7610196.
  67. Plomp,T.(2007).Educational design-based research: An introduction.Int.Plomp & N.Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design-based Research.Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shangai (PRChina), November 23-26, 2007 (pp.9 33): SLO Netherlands Institute for curriculum development.
  68. Saebani, B.A. ( 2012). Pengantar Antropologi. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
  69. Sear, S. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: A Primer for Effective Instruction. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
  70. Shufa, N.K.F. (2018). Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Sekolah Dasar: Sebuah Kerangka Konseptual. Inopendas Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1 (1). 48–5.
  71. Sidek. M. Noah & Jamaludin, A. (2008). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
  72. Soebadio, H., Bachtiar., Harsya, W. (1985). Budaya dan Manusia Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Handita.
  73. Suprijono. (2009). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
  74. Sumintono, B dan Widhiarso, W. (2014). Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
  75. Sumintono, B dan Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Bandung: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
  76. Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
  77. Tiberghien, A. (2008). Students’ conceptions: Culturing conceptions. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 283–295.
  78. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. (2007). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  79. Roets, L., & Maritz, J. (2017). Facilitating the development of higher-order thinking skills (hots) of African novice nursing postgraduates. Nurse Education Today 49, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.005
  80. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An Opportunity to Engage Millennial Students through Active Learning. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 2(105), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12.
  81. Rusman. (2012). Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  82. Rusell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction: A Guide to the Design, Selection, Utilization and Evaluation of Modular Materials. New York: Burgess Publishing Company.
  83. Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua (terjemahan). Jakarta: Kencana.
  84. Schraw, G, and Robinson, D.H. (2011). Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills. New York: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  85. Sears, S., (2003). Introduction to Contextual Teaching and Learning The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington, Indiana.
  86. Shufa, N.K.F. (2018). Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Sekolah Dasar: Sebuah Kerangka Konseptual. Inopendas Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 1 (1), 48-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24176/jino.v1i1.2316.
  87. Thomas, & Thorne., G. (2009). How to increase Higher Order Thinking Centre for Development and Learning
  88. Van den Akker J. (1999). Principles and Methods of Development Research. Pada J. van den Akker, R.Branch, K. Gustafson, Nieven, dan T. Plomp (eds), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 1-14). Dortrech: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  89. Vembriarto, St. (1985). Pengantar Pengajaran Modul. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pendidikan Paramita.
  90. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  91. Ulger, K. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on students' creative thinking and critical thinking disposition in visual arts education. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1649.
  92. Usman, U. (2007). Menjadi Guru Profesional. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
  93. Uprichard, E., & Downey, L. (2016). Data diffraction: Challenging Data Integration in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11(1): 3-10
  94. Utari, U., Degeng, I.N.S., & Akbar, S. (2016). Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Sekolah Dasar dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA). Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran IPS. 1 (1), 39-44.
  95. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um022v1i12016p039.
  96. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  97. Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S.G. (2009). Research Methods in Education an. Introduction. US: Pearson Education, Inc
  98. Winkel, W. S. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.