Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 26, 2023
Accepted
December 11, 2023
Published
January 27, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 423 Download : 264

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigatres the language learning strategies utilized by two proficient EFL learners in learning speaking skills. The present descriptive case study probes and narrates the accounts of two proficient English speakers related to the language learning strategies they employed in learning speaking skills. The two proficient English speakers were perceived as credible and ellible sources for this study as they possess the required TOEFL score for proficient learners as indicated by the English Testing Service (ETS), which is around 543-627 in range. The data used in this study were obtained through four semi-structured interviews conducted via Zoom meetings with the participats. A document in the form of participants’ detailed learning schedules was also gathered to enhance data trustworthiness. Subsequently, the data collected were analysed thematically, generating seven categories of language learning strategies. Findings indicate that both participants utilized all seven strategies performed as the most frequently used strategy. It implies tht both participants often plan, arrange and evaluate their learning in advance. The study also found that few strategies were employed at the early stage of leanring and are no longer in use at present.

Keywords

Language learning strategies English proficiency Speaking skills Strategies inventory for language learning strategies

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Faniah Nur Azizi, Fazri Nur Yusuf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Azizi, F. N., & Yusuf, F. N. (2024). Language learning strategies employed by proficient EFL students in learning speaking skills. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 9(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.28519
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Chamot, A. U. (2008). Strategy instruction and good language learners in Lessons from Good Language Learners, C. Griffiths, Editor
  2. Chou, M. H. (2022). Validating the Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by English as a Foreign Language University Students in Taiwan. RELC Journal, 00336882221074105.
  3. Cohen, A. D. (2007). Becoming a strategic language learner in CALL. Applied Language Learning, 17(1-2), 57-71.
  4. Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Routledge.
  5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (eight edition). Abingdon, Oxon.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning. Conducting, and Evaluating, 260, 375-382.
  7. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(4), 228-232.
  8. Fillmore, L. W. (1979). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 203-228). Academic Press.
  9. Fowle, C. (2002). Vocabulary notebooks: Implementation and outcomes. ElT Journal, 56(4), 380-388.
  10. Gallagher-Brett, A. (2007). What do learners' beliefs about speaking reveal about their awareness of learning strategies?. Language Learning Journal, 35(1), 37-49.
  11. Gani, S. A., Fajrina, D., & Hanifa, R. (2015). Students’ learning strategies for developing speaking ability. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(1), 16-28.
  12. Ghufron, M. A. (2017). Language learning strategies used by EFL fluent speakers: A case in Indonesian context. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 6(2), 184-202.
  13. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
  14. Griffiths, C. (2017). Language learning strategies: A holistic view of language learners. RL Oxford, & A.(. M., Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts. London: Bloomsbury.
  15. Griffiths, C. (Ed.). (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2013). Using case study in education research. SAGE Publications Ltd https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473913851
  17. Hong-Nam, K., & Leavell, A. G. (2006). Language learning strategy use of ESL students in an intensive English learning context. System, 34(3), 399-415.
  18. Kawai, Y. (2008). Speaking and good language learners in Lessons from Good Language Learners, C. Griffiths, Editor.
  19. Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (2017). Buku Panduan Guru Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Lanjut. Pusat Perbukuan
  20. Laufer, Batia, and Paul Nation. "A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability." Language testing 16, no. 1 (1999): 33-51.
  21. Lehmann, Thomas, Inka Hähnlein, and Dirk Ifenthaler. "Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning." Computers in human behavior 32 (2014): 313-323.
  22. Lichtman, M. (2012). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide. Sage publications.
  23. Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms: The role of learner strategies. A&C Black.
  24. Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338-352.
  25. Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness‐raising training on oral communication strategy use. The modern language journal, 89(1), 76-91.
  26. Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. The modern language journal, 90(2), 151-168.
  27. O'malley, J. M., O'Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press.
  28. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies What every teacher should know. Heinle & heinle Publishers.;.
  29. Oxford, R. L. (1992). Research on Second Language Learning Strategies. Annual Review of Applied Linguisitc, 175-187.
  30. Oxford, R. (2018). Language learning strategies. The Cambridge guide to learning English as a second language, 81-90.
  31. Oxford, R. L. (2016). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context. Routledge.
  32. Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults' language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23(3), 359-386.
  33. Park, G. P. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign language annals, 30(2), 211-221.
  34. Peacock, M. (2001). Language learning strategies and EAP proficiency: Teacher views, student views, and test results. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes, 268-285.
  35. Phillips, V. (1991). A look at learner strategy use and ESL proficiency. Catesol Journal, 4(1), 57-67.
  36. Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into practice, 41(4), 219-225.
  37. Poulisse, N. (1987). Problems and solutions in the classification of compensatory strategies. Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht), 3(2), 141-153.
  38. Rahimi, M., & Allahyari, A. (2019). Effects of multimedia learning combined with strategy-based instruction on vocabulary learning and strategy use. Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019844081.
  39. Rao, Z. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90-106.
  40. Rubin, J. (1975). What the" good language learner" can teach us. TESOL quarterly, 41-51.
  41. Rubin, J. (2005). The expert language learner: A review of good language learner studies and learner strategies. Expertise in second language learning and teaching, 37-63.
  42. Rubin, J. (2013). Teaching language-learning strategies. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 1-5.
  43. Schmitt, Norbert, and Diane Schmitt. "Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions." ELT journal 49, no. 2 (1995): 133-143.
  44. Schroeder, R. M. (2016). The Development and Validation of the" Academic Spoken English Strategies Survey (ASESS)" for Non-Native English Speaking Graduate Students. Journal of International Students, 6(2), 394-414.
  45. Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. SAGE Publications, Ltd https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268322
  46. Stickler, U., & Lewis, T. (2008). Collaborative language learning strategies in an email tandem exchange. Language learning strategies in independent settings, 33, 237.
  47. Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Wu, J. G. (2021). Metacognitive Strategies, Language Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy Belief, and English Achievement During Remote Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. RELC Journal, 00336882211040268.
  48. Teng, M. F., & Wu, J. G. (2023). An Investigation of Learners’ Perceived Progress During Online Education: Do Self-Efficacy Belief, Language Learning Motivation, and Metacognitive Strategies Matter?. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-13.
  49. Qingquan, N., Chatupote, M., & Teo, A. (2008). A deep look into learning strategy use by successful and unsuccessful students in the Chinese EFL learning context. RELC Journal, 39(3), 338-358.
  50. Wael, A., Asnur, M. N. A., & Ibrahim, I. (2018). Exploring Students' Learning Strategies in Speaking Performance. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 65-71.
  51. Walters, J., & Bozkurt, N. (2009). The effect of keeping vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 403-423.
  52. Wharton, G. (2000). A Theoretical Model Of Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 204-243.
  53. Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 408-428.
  54. Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC journal, 37(3), 308-328.
  55. Wu, M. M. F. (2008). Language learning strategy use of Chinese ESL learners of Hong Kong-findings from a qualitative study. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1), 68-83.
  56. Wu, J. G., & Miller, L. (2020). Improving English learners’ speaking through mobile-assisted peer feedback. RELC journal, 51(1), 168-178.
  57. Zhou, J., & Huang, L. S. (2018). An exploration of strategies used by Chinese graduate students in electrical engineering and education: Integrating questionnaire, task performance, and post-task recall data. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, 1-22.