Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 30, 2023
Accepted
March 5, 2024
Published
March 9, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 100 Download : 70

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Merdeka Belajar curriculum is the brand-new curriculum implemented in Indonesia in response to the low reading literacy of students. Many discussed the features and the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar curriculum and claim that implementing the current curriculum is effective in improving students' reading literacy due to its features, such as simpler yet in-depth materials and flexible time for learning outcome accomplishment; however, there is not yet any empirical evidence provided to prove the claim. This descriptive research was undertaken to provide empirical evidence of that claim as the curriculum has just been implemented. Twelve teachers across senior high schools in West Sumatera were willingly involved in this study. The data were collected through a written interview, in which the teachers answered ten relevant questions. Their responses about the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar curriculum were analyzed qualitatively. The findings established new facts that answered the research question from the teachers' point of view. First, compared to the 2013 curriculum implementation, they did not only see the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar curriculum as advantageous but also disadvantageous. Even few of them found it run-of-the-mill. Second, when implementing the current curriculum, the teacher developed strategies to increase students' reading literacy and interest. They began by supplying multiple materials, designing fun but exhaustive learning instructional activities, varying the assessments, and building reading corners with captivating books to read. Third, after a year of implementation, the students' reading literacy tended to stay the same, even though it did improve a little for some students. These were because the teachers still experienced problems regarding curriculum, school, and time. In summary, implementing the Merdeka Belajar curriculum cannot improve students' reading literacy.

Keywords

merdeka curriculum reading literacy development teachers' perception

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Zaim, Muflihatuz Zakiyah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Zaim, M., & Zakiyah, M. (2024). Can the Merdeka Belajar curriculum really improve students’ reading literacy?. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 9(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.32173
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abidin, H. Z., & Zaman, F. H. K. (2017). Students’ perceptions on game-based classroom response system in a computer programming course. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education, IEEE ICEED 2017, 2018-Janua, 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251203
  2. Aguilar-Cruz, P. J., & Álvarez Guayara, H. A. (2021). A Serious Game to learn English: The case of Bethe1Challenge. International Journal of Serious Games, 8(4), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.17083/IJSG.V8I4.448
  3. Alfama Zamista, A., Deswita UIN Imam Bonjol Padang Jl Yunus, P. M., Lintah, L., Barat, S., adeliazamista, I., & Author, C. (2023). Perceptions of Indonesian teachers on the implementation of the "Merdeka" Curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(1), 13–25. http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/wd
  4. Anggraena, Y., Felicia, N., Ginanto, D. E., Pratiwi, I., Utama, B., Alhapip, L., & Widiaswati, D. (2022). Kajian Akademik: Kurikulum untuk Pemulihan Pembelajaran (1st ed., Februari 2021). Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/unduhan/Kajian_Pemulihan.pdf
  5. Ariati, S. D., & Iswahyuni, I. (2023). Students’ Perceptions Towards the Application of Gamification in English Class. ELLITE: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 8(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.32528/ellite.v8i1.15297
  6. Aulia, K. N. (2019). An Evaluation of English Textbook for Senior High School Students Grade X Published by Erlangga. In Repository of UIN Jakarta (Vol. 1, Issue 1). http://conference.unsri.ac.id
  7. Avvisati, F., Echazarra, A., Givord, P., & Schwabe, M. (2019). Indonesia Country Note PISA 2018 Result. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf
  8. Bender, W. N. (2012). Differentiated Instruction: Then and Now. In Differentiating Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities: New Best Practices for General and Special Educators (3rd ed., pp. 1–24). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393340173
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  10. Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 243–257. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1014490922622%5Cnhttp://link.springer.com.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/article/10.1023/A:1014490922622%5Cnhttp://link.springer.com.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1014490922622.pdf
  11. Fatma, & Ratmanida. (2023). English Teachers’ Perception toward Merdeka Curriculum at Junior High Schools in Koto Tangah, Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(4), 1089–1095. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i4.125677
  12. Ferdaus, S. A., & Novita, D. (2023). The Implementation of The Merdeka Curriculum in English Subject at A Vocational High School in Indonesia. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 8(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v8i2.1201
  13. Fitrawati, F. (2012). Improving Senior High School Students’ Reading Comprehension through Reading Strategies Derived from Genre Based Approach. Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Seni, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/KOMPOSISI.V10I2.60
  14. Gunawan, G. (2022). Teaching Reading Comprehension Through Genre-Based Approach (GBA) at Senior High School. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 4(1), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v4i1.3224
  15. Gusti Yarmi, S. W. M. Z. E. (2022). Implementation of the Reading Corner Through the School Literature Movement in Increasing Students' Reading Interest in Elementary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 5(3), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.55215/jppguseda.v5i3.6475
  16. Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Berpotensi Tingkatkan Skor PISA Indonesia. (2022). Gerakan Literasi Nasional (GLN). https://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/implementasi-kurikulum-merdeka-berpotensi-tingkatkan-skor-pisa-indonesia/
  17. Kamila, S. N., & Agus RM, A. H. (2023). Implementation of Merdeka Curriculum in Improving the Quality of Senior High School. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(1), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i1.4591
  18. Kemendikbudristek BSKAP. (2022). [Salinan] Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 Tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pen (p. 149). https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/unduhan/CP_2022.pdf
  19. Kurikulum Merdeka – Pusat Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. (n.d.). Retrieved January 7, 2023, from http://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/
  20. Latar Belakang Kurikulum Merdeka – Merdeka Mengajar. (n.d.). Kemendikbudristek RI. Retrieved April 3, 2023, from https://pusatinformasi.guru.kemdikbud.go.id/hc/en-us/articles/6824331505561-Latar-Belakang-Kurikulum-Merdeka
  21. Latifah, N., Ishlahiyah, M., & Furaida, A. (2020). Teachers’ Perceptions: Implementation of Character Building in ELT toward Indonesian Millenial Generation. The 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations (ICRI 2018), 50, 553–563. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009911805530563
  22. Lavania, M., & Mohamad Nor, F. (2013). Factors Influencing the Implementation of Differentiated Instruction in English Language Instruction in Rural and Urban Secondary Schools of Johor Bahru. Creative Education, 12, 1235–1246. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.126093
  23. Mo, J. (2019). How does PISA define and measure reading literacy? In PISA in Focus (No. 101; PISA). https://doi.org/10.1787/efc4d0fe-en
  24. Montero-Arévalo, S. J. (2019). Effects Of Genre Based Approach (GBA) In EFL Reading Comprehension And Writing. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 19(19), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.762
  25. Muh. Said, D. R. S., & Munawir. (2022). The Use of Genre-Based Approach (GBA) in Teaching Reading Comprehension in Terms of Skimming. Inspiring: English Education Journal, 5(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.35905/inspiring.v5i1.2621
  26. Nabella, A. C. R., & Rini, S. (2023). The Effectiveness of Using Genre-Based Approach to Enhance Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text for Young Learners. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(4), 758. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i4.8643
  27. Nurmuhaemin, W. (2022, May 27). Kurikulum Merdeka Nestapa ”Sekolah Paria”. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/baca/artikel-opini/2022/05/25/kurikulum-merdeka-nestapa-sekolah-paria
  28. OECD. (2000). Literacy in the Information Age: Final Report of the Adult International Survey. https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/41529765.pdf
  29. Peraturan Pemerintah RI. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi Tentang Standar Proses Pada Pendidikan Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah, 1(69), 5–24.
  30. Prakoso, B. H., Ramdani, Z., & Rahmah, B. (2021). Teacher’s Perception on Merdeka Belajar Policy. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v3i2.84
  31. Pratiwi, I. (2019). EFEK PROGRAM PISA TERHADAP KURIKULUM DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.24832/JPNK.V4I1.1157
  32. Putra, P. P., & Priyatmojo, A. S. (2021). Students’ perception toward gamification applied in English language classroom. ELT Forum, 10(1), 21–29. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt
  33. Rakhmawati, E., Kusdaryani, W., & Suyati, T. (2022). Teacher’s Perception in Exploring the Merdeka Curriculum for Early Childhood Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 10(3), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v10i3.55842
  34. Serasi, R., Fatimah, L., Hakim, M. A. R., & Anggraini, D. (2021). A TEXTBOOK EVALUATION ON ENGLISH TEXTBOOK ENTITLED “GROW WITH ENGLISH” USED BY STUDENTS OF MI NURUL HUDA BENGKULU CITY. Jurnal Al-Lughah, 10(1), 21–31.
  35. Supriatna, D. (2023). Implementation of Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in Elementary Schools: How is Teachers’ Perception? International Journal Of Education, 02(02), 30–40. https://e-journal.citakonsultindo.or.id/index.php/IJEVSS/article/view/182
  36. Triskia, M. D., Yulia, H., & Afifah, N. (2023). Teachers perception of the implementation of Merdeka curriculum at SMP IT Fathona Oku Baturaja and SMP IT Tunas Cendikia Baturaja. Journal of Language Education (JOLE), 7(1), 1–9. https://journal.unbara.ac.id/index.php/JoLE/article/view/2178
  37. Ubay, S. N., Eldarni, E., Rayendra, R., & ... (2023). Teachers’ Perceptions on the Merdeka Curriculum at SMP Negeri 39 Padang City. Jurnal Ilmiah …, 9(4), 2220–2226. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v9i1.5869/http
  38. Yuanovita, P. F. (2011). The Content Analysis Of English Textbook Used By First Grader Of Senior High School Level “Look Ahead” Published By Erlangga [UIN SATU Tulungagung]. In UIN SATU Tulungagung Institutional Repository. http://repo.uinsatu.ac.id/id/eprint/1334
  39. Zainiah, Z., Education, L., Negeri, U., Verina, N., Putri, W., Education, L., & Negeri, U. (2022). Students ’ Perception of Gamified Online Quizzes. 5(May), 98–108.
  40. Zens, A. (2021). The impact of differentiated learning activities on student engagement and motivation in the English language arts classroom. Dissertations, Theses, and Projects, 611. https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/611/%0Ahttps://red.mnstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1645&context=thesis
  41. Zidan, M. R. (2023). A Literature Study On The Implementation Of Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Bahasa (JURRIBAH), 2(2), 153–167.