Main Article Content

Abstract

The role of culture in the interaction process also determines the effectiveness of communication that takes place between generations. This research aims to describe communication barriers that impact the effectiveness of interactions between Gen Z and Alpha in the era of cultural digitalization. The literature used is Chaney and Martin's theory of communication barriers which was processed through a process of observation and interviews. The research results showed that there were nine types of barriers found, namely physical, cultural, perceptual, motivational, experiantial, emotional, linguistic, non-verbal, and competition. The nine types of communication barriers are supported by explanations from sources or participants in the data. These findings show that there is a gap between Gen Z and Alpha, in this case in the context of cross-cultural communication. This has an impact on the emergence of quite complex communication barriers. Of the nine types of barriers, the barriers most frequently encountered are linguistic, motivational, and competition. Based on these findings, motivational communication barriers have the potential to give rise to conflict between Gen Z and Alpha due to a feeling of not being appreciated when interacting. The role of digital in this era also has an impact on hampering effectiveness of communication. Nevertheless, communication barriers from a cultural aspect need to be seen as the complexity of cultural diversity that exists in Indonesia, both language differences and other differences. This should not be claimed as a reason for conflict, but rather as a medium for tolerance and mutual respect so that communication barriers can be minimized. So, the communication process that occurs in the future can be more effective and harmonious.

Keywords

Communication barriers Cultural Gen alpha Gen Z Language

Article Details

Author Biographies

Bambang Wibisono, Universitas Jember

Prof. Dr. Bambang Wibisono, M.Pd. is a lecturer for the Intercultural Communication course in the Master of Linguistics program at the Faculty of Cultural Sciences, University of Jember. He earned his doctorate in 2005 from the State University of Malang and has been a lecturer since March 1, 1985. Throughout his career, he has extensively researched language and language behavior.

Titis Rizka Yusnita, Universitas Jember

Titis Rizka Yusnita, S.S. was born on March 15th 1998, in Jember. She earned her bachelor's degree in 2020. In 2023, she continued studying Masters in Linguistics at the Faculty of Humanities, Jember University, Indonesia. She works as a teacher at a vocational school in Jember Regency. She also takes a job as a master of ceremony of events at formal foundation activities and other agencies. You can contact her via email address, titisrizkayusnita@gmail.com or WhatsApp number +6282335626123.

Akhmad Haryono, Universitas Jember

Prof. Dr. Akhmad Haryono, M.Pd. was born in Jember 03 October 1967. In 2013 he got his PhD of Humanities focused on Sociolinguistics Study and Communication Ethnography approach in Faculty of Cultural Science at Gajah Mada University. From 1998 up to now he has been a lecturer at Faculty of Cultural Science, University of Jember.  His research interest includes social humanities, especially on the study of language and ethnic culture (Madurese and Osing).

How to Cite
Wibisono, B., Yusnita, T. R., & Haryono, A. (2025). Communication barriers between gen Z and alpha in the cultural digitalization era. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v10i1.35077

References

  1. Ananda, L. D., & Sarwoprasodjo, S. (2017). Pengaruh Hambatan Komunikasi Antarbudaya Suku Sunda dengan Non-Sunda terhadap Efektivitas Komunikasi. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 15(2), 114–160. https://doi.org/10.46937/15201723614
  2. Aries, Mardiyansyah, R., & Santana, S. (2020). Pemenuhan Nilai Investigasi dalam Konten YouTube Watchdoc. Prosiding Jurnalistik, 6(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29313/.v6i2.23221
  3. Azzahra, S. R., Manalu, S. R., & Santosa, H. P. (2022). Komunikasi Disabilitas: Memahami Hambatan Komunikasi dan Social Support Pegawai Frontline Tuli di Lingkungan Kerja Dengar. Interaksi Online, 11, 272–284. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/37191%0Ahttps://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/download/37191/28318
  4. Cahyono, H. B. (2018). Hambatan Komunikasi Antarbudaya Mahasiswa Thailand di Jember. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Mediakom, 1(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32528/mdk.v1i2.1572
  5. Chaney, L. H., & Martin, J. S. (2014). Intercultural Business Communication. New Jersey: Pearson.
  6. Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 1–6. https://etheses.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/32855
  7. Dianto, I. (2019). Hambatan Komunikasi Antar Budaya (Menarik Diri, Prasangka Sosial, dan Etnosentrisme). Jurnal Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam, 13(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.24952/hik.v13i2.1847
  8. Durante, J. C., Sims, J., Jarin, J., Gold, M. A., Messiah, S. E., & Francis, J. K. (2023). Long-Acting Reversible Contraception for Adolescents: A Review of Practices to Support Better Communication, Counseling, and Adherence. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 14, 97–114. https://doi.org/10.2147/ahmt.s374268
  9. Fitrianti, A., & Riyandani, F. (2023). Hambatan Komunikasi Antarbudaya Mahasiswa Papua di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(2), 18042–18046. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/9219/7535
  10. Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). “True Gen”: Generation Z and Its Implications for Companies. In McKinsey & Company.
  11. Fuadi, Y., Sunyanti, Swandito, A., & Rohanto, E. (2023). Efektifitas Toolbox Meeting pada Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Juru Ikat di PT Pelabuhan Penajam Banua Taka. Identifikasi: Jurnal Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja dan Lindungan Lingkungan, 9(1), 757–765. https://doi.org/10.36277/identifikasi.v9i1.265
  12. Gunawan, H. (2021). Nilai Etika dalam Tatanan Globalisasi dan Digitalisasi Budaya. Jurnal Sosial Sains, 1(7), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.36418/sosains.v1i7.111
  13. Hardini, F., Tarigan, S. J. B., & Trang, V. T. T. (2022). Barriers and Coping Strategies of Students with Disability During Inclusive Learning in Higher Education. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran): Kajian dan Riset dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran, 9(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v9i22022p176
  14. Haryono, A. (2011). Perubahan dan Perkembangan Bahasa: Tinjauan Historis dan Sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Harian Regional Universitas Udayana, 18, 1–9. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/linguistika/article/download/9679/7195
  15. Hazani, D. C. (2023). Dampak Kepribadian Introvert terhadap Generasi Z dalam Interaksi Sosial Sehari-hari di Kota Mataram. Pensa: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(3), 55–76. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/pensa
  16. Jefriyanto, J., Mayasari, M., Lubis, F. O., & Kusrin, K. (2020). Culture Shock dalam Komunikasi Lintas Budaya pada Mahasiswa. JPI: Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana, 5(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.35706/jpi.v5i1.3740
  17. Juhanda. (2019). Menjaga Eksistensi Budaya Lokal dengan Pendekatan Komunikasi Lintas Budaya. Jurnal Sadar Wisata, 2(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.32528/sw.v2i1.1825
  18. Kurniawati, D., & Nurmaisarah. (2018). Komunikasi Lintas Budaya dalam Iklan YouTube. KomunikA, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.32734/komunika.v14i2.5896
  19. Lia, N. A. (2022). Hambatan Komunikasi Antarbudaya Mahasiswa Baru di Media Virtual. Jurnal Communicology: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(2), 206–227. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/communicology/article/view/20578
  20. Lubis, L. A., Kurniawan, A. J., & Pohan, S. (2020). Komunikasi Antarbudaya dalam Perkawinan Beda Warga Negara. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 18(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v18i1.3711
  21. Lutfiyah, L. Z., & Kinanti, K. P. (2020). Peran Perempuan Masa Kini pada Iklan Televisi (Kajian Semiotika Roland Barthes). Basastra, 9(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v9i3.19921
  22. Maharani, N. P. L. K., Priyandari, P. R., & Indrawan, I. A. K. (2023). Strategi Optimalisasi Komunikasi Intrapersonal dan Interpersonal di Kalangan Gen Z dalam Pembangunan Menuju Era Industri 5.0. PILAR: Prosiding Pekan Ilmiah Pelajar, 3, 328–336. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/pilar/article/view/6150
  23. Mahmudah, M., & Mansyur, M. A. (2021). Komunikasi Antar Budaya Masyarakat Jawa dan Madura. JKaKa: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Konseling Islam, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30739/jkaka.v1i1.805
  24. Maldani, D. I., & Setiawan, E. (2021). Pengalaman Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Mahasiswa Undergraduate Indonesia di Belanda. Journal Riset Public Relation, 1(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrpr.v1i1.176
  25. Manuel, R. A., & Sutanto, A. (2021). Generasi Alpha: Tinggal di Antara. Jurnal Stupa: Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur, 3(1), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.24912/stupa.v3i1.10468
  26. Maulida, U. (2022). Pergeseran Makna Kata pada Komunikasi Generasi Alpha sebagai Kontestasi Identitas. Kode: Jurnal Bahasa, 11(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.24114/kjb.v11i1.33492
  27. Mucharam, A. (2022). Membangun Komunikasi Publik yang Efektif. Ikon: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 27(1), 71–82. https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/IKON/article/download/1830/1495/
  28. Nurhadi, Z. F., Mujianto, H., & Angeline, A. F. (2022). Komunikasi Antar Budaya pada Perantau dengan Masyarakat Lokal di Garut. Komunika: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 9(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.22236/komunika.v9i1.7495
  29. Nurrohmah, F. (2021). Analisis Senyapan dan Kilir Lidah pada Produksi Ujaran “Belbetnya Isyana Sarasvati.” Diksa (Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia), 7(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v7i2.22653
  30. Prasmi, S. M., Sumarah, N., & Danadharta, I. (2019). Hambatan Komunikasi Lintas Budaya (Mahasiswa Papua di Surabaya). Jurnal Representamen, 5(2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.30996/representamen.v5i02.2935
  31. Rizak, M. (2018). Peran Pola Komunikasi Antarbudaya dalam Mencegah Konflik Antarkelompok Agama. Islamic Comunication Journal, 3(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2018.3.1.2680
  32. Sahid, M. (2021). Hambatan Komunikasi pada Proses Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Whatsapp Group. JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i1.1673
  33. Syukur, M. F. A., & Trigartanti, W. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Persuasif Komunitas 1000 Guru Bandung dalam Mengajar dan Memotivasi Anak-Anak Negeri. Public Relations (Bandung Conference Series), 2(2), 698–703. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcspr.v2i2.4584
  34. Tolchin, B., Baslet, G., Martino, S., Suzuki, J., Blumenfeld, H., Hirsch, L. J., Altalib, H., & Dworetzky, B. A. (2020). Motivational Interviewing Techniques to Improve Psychotherapy Adherence and Outcomes for Patients with Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 32(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19020045
  35. Triyasningrum, S. M. D., Suskarwati, S. U., & Sagala, A. J. (2023). Perilaku Non Verbal Tour Guide Lombok sebagai Komunikasi Antarbudaya dalam Berinteraksi dengan Wisatawan Asing. Jurnal Mutakallimin: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.31602/jm.v6i2.12839
  36. Tuwendi, W. A., Sari, W. P., & Salman, D. (2023). Strategi Komunikasi Caster dalam Era Digital di Dunia Esports. Koneksi, 7(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.24912/kn.v7i1.21519
  37. Wahyuningsih, S., Dida, S., Suminar, J. R., & Setianti, Y. (2019). Hambatan Komunikasi Terapeutik Psikiater, Perawat, Kader Jiwa, dan Keluarga pada Pasien Gangguan Jiwa Pasca Pasung. Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa, 7(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.26714/jkj.7.2.2019.115-126
  38. Wibisono, B. (2020). Perilaku Berbahasa Masyarakat pada Era Disrupsi. E-Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pekan Chairil Anwar: Humaniora dan Era Disrupsi, 1(1), 31–41. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/19968/8720
  39. Yusuf, S. (2020). Hambatan Komunikasi Antarbudaya (Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Magister Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Gadjah Mada Angkatan 2019). Komunikologi: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sosial, 4(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.30829/komunikologi.v4i1.6745