Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 14, 2024
Accepted
March 28, 2025
Published
April 12, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 25 Download : 2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Israel-Hamas conflict, claiming around 42,960 lives from October 2023 to September 2024, has received extensive international media attention with varying portrayals. While Western perspectives are widely examined, research on non-Western media remains limited. This study analyzes how Channel News Asia (CNA) in Southeast Asia and The National in the Middle East employ euphemism and dysphemism to frame public perceptions of the conflict. Using Allan and Burridge’s typologies, this qualitative research examines 20 news articles from each outlet between October 2023 and September 2024. Through coding and categorization, it explores how language not only reports events but also shapes national and international discourse. Results reveal a significant difference in rhetorical approach: CNA predominantly uses dysphemisms, particularly to delegitimize Hamas, positioning the group as a threat. to state and represent a very bad thing or condition. In contrast, The National employs more euphemisms to soften portrayals of Palestinian actions and emphasize humanitarian concerns, presenting Palestinians sympathetically and highlighting civilian impact. This strategy suggests alignment with pro-Palestinian narratives, aiming to evoke empathy from readers. This study contributes to media discourse analysis by examining non-Western framing of conflict, illustrating how euphemisms and dysphemisms act as ideological tools in shaping public opinion. Expanding the scope to include non-Western perspectives highlights the role of regional media in influencing global narratives on sensitive geopolitical issues. Future research could apply this framework to similar rhetorical strategies in other conflicts and contexts.

Keywords

Euphemism Dysphemism Israel-Hamas conflict non-Western media

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Ali Rohmatullah, Agwin Degaf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Rohmatullah, M. A., & Degaf, A. (2025). Framing Conflict through Euphemism and Dysphemism in Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern Media. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 10(1), 218–246. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v10i1.38200
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abualrob, I., & Yousef, A. (2024). The evolution of Palestinian narrative: ‘Mo’ as an illustration. An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities), 38(4), 795–818. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247.38.4.2183
  2. Ahmed, A., & Jomaa, N. (2022). Euphemistic expressions in the American mass media: A qualitative study of types and functions. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 4(2), 65-77.
  3. AJLabs. (2024, September 13). Israel-Gaza war in maps and charts: Live tracker. Retrieved September 18, 2024, from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2023/10/9/israel-hamas-war-in-maps-and-charts-live-tracker
  4. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1988). Euphemism, dysphemism, and cross-varietal synonymy. La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics, 1(1), 1–17.
  5. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.
  6. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Al-Radhi, H. (2019). Strategic functions in CNN’s media discourse: An ideological method to convince people. Studies in English Language Teaching, 7(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v7n1p14
  8. Alsayed, H. A. (2023). A pragmatic study of euphemisms in Cable News Network (2003–present). Journal of the Faculty of Arts, 68(68), 41–80. https://doi.org/10.21608/bfa.2023.196392.1178
  9. Amer, M. (2022). BBC and New York Times’ coverage of the May 2021 Israeli onslaught on Gaza: A critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n5p1
  10. American Jewish Committee. (2023, December 27). What you need to know about the Iran-backed terror group Hamas and its attack on Israel. American Jewish Committee. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://www.ajc.org/news/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-iran-backed-terror-group-hamas-and-its-attack-on-israel
  11. Anber, M. (2023). Metaphor in political discourse. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities, 30(12, 2), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.30.12.2.2023.28
  12. Aytan, A., Aynur, B., Hilal, P., Aytac, E., & Malahat, A. (2021). Euphemisms and dysphemisms as language means implementing rhetorical strategies in political discourse. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 741-754.
  13. Barari, H., & Yacoub, R. (2024). Unmasking media bias and religious Zionism’s impeding political influence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. American Journal of Arts and Human Science, 3(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajahs.v3i3.2461
  14. BBC. (2023, October 13). Mengapa BBC tidak menyebut Hamas sebagai 'teroris'? BBC News Indonesia. Retrieved September 17, 2024, from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cp4j12lw92lo
  15. Brousse, C. M. (2020). The effects of figurative language on perceptions of war: A case of euphemisms and dysphemisms. PhD Thesis. University of Louisiana at Lafayette
  16. Burridge, K. (2012). Euphemism and language change: The sixth and seventh ages. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology, (7). https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.355
  17. Campillo, P. (2006). The use of circumlocution in the foreign language context. Porta Linguarum: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.30430
  18. Campos-Delgado, A. (2024). Euphemistic rhetoric and dysphemistic practices: Governing migration in Mexico. Geopolitics, 29(1), 64-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2185513
  19. Choi, J. (2020). Watchdog or cheerleader: The role of American news media in covering political leader's speech. Media Watch, 11(2), 363-370.
  20. Chomsky, N. (2022). Politik Kuasa Media. Jalan Baru Publisher.
  21. Dashti, F., & Dashti, A. (2017). Morphological adaptation of English loanwords in Twitter: Educational implications. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 231. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n3p231
  22. Degaf, A., Nabila, I., & Amrullah, L. (2023, March). The depiction of environmental preservation by Indonesian media: Study of euphemism and dysphemism. In 4th Annual International Conference on Language, Literature and Media (AICOLLIM 2022) (pp. 41-51). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-002-2_5
  23. Doménech-Beltrán, J. (2024). Cross-cutting exposure to the Spanish public broadcasting system: Influence of ideology, partisanship, and interest in politics on RTVE’s consumption. Communication & Society, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.2.19-33
  24. Eldin, A. (2023). A linguistic study of the media war between Russia and Ukraine. Wadi Al-Nil Journal for Human, Social, and Educational Studies, 40(40), 51–80. https://doi.org/10.21608/jwadi.2023.320760
  25. Elyas, T., & Aljabri, A. (2020). Representations of Saudi male’s guardianship system and women’s freedom to travel in Western newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 7(3), 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347798920921977
  26. Fatinova, D., Gunawan, W., Saifullah, A. R., Risnawati, E., Emha, R. J., & Mubarok, Y. (2024). The representation of the Indonesian government in media: A critical discourse analysis of the Rempang Island conflict. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(2), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10926
  27. Fayyaz, A., Abdulaziz, M., & Urooj, I. (2023). Role of euphemisms: An analysis of English language newspapers’ headlines. Journal of Communication and Cultural Trends, 5(1), 01-16. https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct.51.01
  28. Fengler, S., Kreutler, M., Alku, M., Barlovac, B., Bastian, M., Bodrunova, S. S., ... & Zguri, R. (2020). The Ukraine conflict and the European media: A comparative study of newspapers in 13 European countries. Journalism, 21(3), 399-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918774311
  29. Gallois, H. (2024). Discourse, narrative, and voice: The power of communicating bioethics through the media. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.7202/1110324ar
  30. Gibbs, R., Nayak, N., Bolton, J., & Keppel, M. (1989). Speakers' assumptions about the lexical flexibility of idioms. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03199557
  31. Gorčević, A. (2022). Dysphemisms in British print media: Inevitable negative alternative or trend? Journal of Contemporary Applied Linguistics, 397(412). https://doi.org/10.46630/jkaj.2022.24
  32. Habibi, A., Jupri, & Dehghani, S. (2022). Developing the prototype of text-based learning materials for the teaching of reading skills at the middle schools. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v2i2.760
  33. Harlow, S., Camaj, L., & Pjesivac, I. (2022). Protest reporting across clientelist media systems. International Communication Gazette, 85(5), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485221146862
  34. Hashish, Y., Ismail, A., & Abusaada, H. (2023). BBC coverage of the aggression on Gaza 2021: Critical discourse analysis of Arabic and English versions. Komunikator, 15(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.18196/jim.18508
  35. Hastuti, N. (2024). Penggunaan disfemisme dalam tuturan anak usia 4 tahun: Kajian semantik. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 12(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v12i3.121768
  36. Huda, M., Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., Sutan, A., Misran, M., Utaminingsih, N., & Suswanta, S. (2022). Social media role to support Palestinian on Palestine–Israel conflict (2021). Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Media and Digital Communication, 901–913. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-65-7_71
  37. Jha, A. (2023). Linguistic strategies in media discourse analysis of global politics. International Journal of Political Media, 2(2), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.26524/ijpm.2.9
  38. Jian, M. (2024). Performance of language: A comparative linguistic study of news about China and Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Canadian news program. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.32920/25412824
  39. Kalinina, A. V., Yusupova, E. E., & Voevoda, E. V. (2019). Means of influence on public opinion in political context: Speech manipulation in the media. Media Watch, 10(2), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2019/v10i2/49625
  40. Khotimah, K., Laksono, K., & Suhartono, N. (2022). Patterns of dysphemism of COVID-19 news in Indonesian mass media: Critical eco-discourse analysis. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 5(4), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v5i4.1015
  41. Martin, G., & McCrain, J. (2019). Local news and national politics. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000965
  42. Maryadi, A., Mahmudah, M., & Mayong, M. (2022). The use of power language by South Sulawesi women legislators in political discourse through vocabulary features: A case study of the chairperson of the Regional House of Representatives of South Sulawesi. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Social Sciences Study, 3(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.47616/jamrsss.v3i3.316
  43. Masduki, A., Jian, L., & Niu, P. (2023). Media views in Indonesia on the Belt and Road Initiative policy: A study of Indonesian new media reports on the BRI project of China in Indonesia. International Journal of Communication and Society, 5(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijcs.v5i1.1019
  44. Mirrlees, T. (2023). Ten postulates of a media imperialism framework: For critical research on China’s media power and influence in the global south. Global Media and China, 9(4), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231195934
  45. Mohammed-Nouri, A. L. S. A., & Agha, W. M. A. (2023). Euphemism And Dysphemism in the Age of Coronavirusim!" Political and Healthcare Speeches: A Critical Discourse Analysis”. College of Education for Women Journal, (1).
  46. Mudau, M. L. (2023). Political euphemisms in Tshivenḓa: A sociopragmatic analysis. South African Journal of African Languages, 43(sup1), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2024.2322274
  47. Mudau, M. L. (2024). Death euphemisms on tombstones: A case of the Vhavenḓa’s metaphorical conceptualisation of death. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2024.2321903
  48. Murray, J., & Nyberg, D. (2020). Industry vs. government: Leveraging media coverage in corporate political activity. Organization Studies, 42(10), 1629–1650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620964163
  49. Nartey, M., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2021). Constructing undesirables: A critical discourse analysis of othering of Fulani nomads in the Ghanaian news media. Discourse & Communication, 15(2), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320982095
  50. Neureiter, M. (2017). Sources of media bias in coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: the 2010 Gaza flotilla raid in German, British, and US newspapers. Israel Affairs, 23(1), 66-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537121.2016.1244381
  51. Nurjanah, R. L. (2021). Attitude analysis of “The Guardian” editorial: Lockdown policy and the government. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 6(2), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v6i2.13776
  52. Octavia, N., Lukmana, I., & Bachari, A. (2021). Euphemisms in conversations about bullying issues. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Sciences & Humanities, 211–219. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211119.083
  53. Olimat, S. N. (2020). Words as Powerful Weapons: Dysphemism in Trump's Covid-19 Speeches. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 26(3). http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2020-2603-02
  54. Ozymenko, V., & Larina, T. (2021). Threat and fear: Pragmatic purposes of emotionalisation in media discourse. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(3), 746–766. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-746-766
  55. Peterson, E. (2020). Paper cuts: How reporting resources affect political news coverage. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12560
  56. Priya, L. (2024). Gaza crisis and the Arabic press: A discourse analysis. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 11(4), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/23477989241292150
  57. Schlessinger, J., Bennet, R., Coakwell, J., Smith, S., & Kao, E. (2024). Exposing the obscured influence of state-controlled media via causal inference of quotation propagation. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5271692/v1
  58. Schofield, T., Deckman, T., Garris, C., DeWall, C., & Denson, T. (2015). Brief report. Sage Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015576057
  59. Soriano, C., David, C., & Atun, J. (2019). Crystallising the official narrative: News discourses about the killings from the Philippine government’s campaign against illegal drugs. Journalism, 22(9), 2386–2403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919867820
  60. Stephens, R., & Zile, A. (2017). Does emotional arousal influence swearing fluency? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(4), 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9473-8
  61. Sutkutė, R. (2024). Public Discourse on the Israel‐Hamas War 2023: A Comparative Analysis of Lithuania and the United Kingdom. Sociology Lens, 37(3), 371-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12471
  62. Tarigan, S. B., & Marpaung, M. S. (2023). The Use of Euphemisms in the Book of “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(2), 363-372.
  63. Thibodeau, P. and Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: the role of metaphor in reasoning. Plos One, 6(2), e16782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
  64. Veronika, I., & Degaf, A. (2024). Anti-vaccine COVID-19 narratives: A critical textual analysis of American and Indonesian online news. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(3), 1782–1800. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i3.37380
  65. Wardana, M. K., & Geubrina, M. (2024). Framing and metaphor in the discourse of Sumatran orangutans’ conservation: Ecolinguistics study. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 9(1), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.29977
  66. Zegeye, B. E., Godisso, S. H., & Temesegen, E. A. (2023). The socio-pragmatic analysis of Amharic euphemisms of sexual organs and sexual acts. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2231620. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2231620