Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 17, 2024
Accepted
April 10, 2025
Published
April 14, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 22 Download : 3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the application of modality in analytical exposition texts written by senior high school students, focusing on how different modalities convey ideas, judgments, and attitudes. Employing a comprehensive theoretical framework, the research categorizes modality into three types: epistemic (expressing degrees of certainty), deontic (indicating necessity or obligation), and dynamic (reflecting ability or willingness). Data were gathered through a documentation method, analyzing 36 essays written by 11th-grade students in an academic writing class. The analysis identified 77 clauses containing modality, distributed as follows: 42 clauses (54.5%) were epistemic, 11 clauses (14.3%) were deontic, and 24 clauses (31.2%) were dynamic. The dominance of epistemic modality indicates students’ inclination to express degrees of certainty in their arguments, reflecting an awareness of the persuasive demands of analytical exposition. The moderate presence of dynamic modality highlights their ability to convey potential or capability, while the limited use of deontic modality suggests less emphasis on obligation or necessity in their arguments. These findings underscore the critical role of modality in academic writing, particularly in structuring clear and persuasive arguments. This study emphasizes the need for educators to enhance students' understanding and effective application of modality in writing, ensuring greater clarity and precision in their analytical texts. By addressing gaps in students’ use of modality, this research contributes to improving their expressive skills and their ability to tackle complex issues critically. Furthermore, it offers insights into how instructional strategies can better support students in mastering this essential aspect of academic communication.

Keywords

Modality Analytical exposition text Bilingual school

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Khairani Ritonga, T. Silvana Sinar, T. Thyrhaya Zein

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author Biography

Siti Khairani Ritonga, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Fakultas Ilmu Budaya
How to Cite
Ritonga, S. K., Sinar, T. S., & Zein, T. T. (2025). Exploring Modality in Analytical Exposition Texts: A Study of Senior High School Students’ Writing. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 10(1), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v10i1.39049
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anis, M., & Khan, R. (2023). Integrating Multimodal Approaches in English Language Teaching for Inclusive Education: A Pedagogical Exploration. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 241–257.
  2. Cahyani, I., Nurhadi, J., & Mentari, M. (2023). Enhancing writing skills and language creativity through the plus-minus-interesting technique: A case study at the primary school level. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58257
  3. Cahyati, N. (2020). Modality In Tertiary Students’ Hortatory Exposition Texts: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.
  4. Dalimunte, M. (2024). Semantic Modality (S. Hamidah, Ed.). Medan: CV. Manhaji.
  5. Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2021). Mood and modality in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 207–227). Wiley.
  6. Gee, J. P. (2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  7. Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
  8. Hermayanti, W. D., & Gunawan, W. (2024). Understanding Analytical Exposition Text Writing with an SFL Approach: A Comparative Analysis of Model Text and Student’s Text. Journal of English Pedagogy and Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 124–136.
  9. Kusmaryani, W., & Ramli. (2023). Research Methods In English Language Teaching (Rusli, Ed.). Tasikmalaya: erkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia (PRCI).
  10. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Wang, B., Ma, Y., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2022). Cognition in Systemic Functional Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8713-6_6
  11. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Arizona State University: Sage Publications.
  12. Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
  13. Ngongo, M. (2021). The Investigation of Modality and Adjunct in Spoken Text of Proposing A Girl Using Waijewa Language Based on Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistic Approach. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(1), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v10i1.5382
  14. Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., Khorram, F., & Moezzipour, F. (2022). Exploring the use of modality in EFL learners’ writing. English Text Construction, 15(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00050.ost
  15. Palmer, F. R. (2014). Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
  16. Rohmah, N., & Muslim, A. B. (2021). Writing Anxiety in Academic Writing Practice: Insights from EFL Learners’ Perspectives. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 348–354. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.053
  17. Rui, Z., & Jingxia, L. (2018). The Study on the Interpersonal Meanings of Modality in Micro-blogging English News Discourse by the case of “Donald Trump’s Muslim Entry Ban.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.2p.110
  18. Siregar, T. M. S. B., Fadhilla, A., Lestari, A., Simbolon, J., Suhendra, M., Oktaviani, P., & Hendratno, S. (2023). Improve Students’ Writing Skills for English Major Students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation, 1(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58860/ijari.v1i2.22
  19. Siregar, Y., Pasaribu, A. N., & Sinambela, E. (2021). An Analysis of Mood and Modality. PIONEER: Journal of Language and Literature, 13(2), 302. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v13i2.1299
  20. Stapleton, C. M., Zhang, H., & Berman, J. S. (2021). The event-specific benefits of writing about a difficult life experience. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 17(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2089
  21. Van Rijt, J. H. M. (2024). Formal Linguistics and Language Education. New Empirical Perspectives. Applied Linguistics, 45(4), 759–761. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab080
  22. Von, W. Y. (2024). The Use of Linguistic Modality Among Malaysian Lecturers in Language Education Classroom for Teacher Candidates. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.7468
  23. Wihadi, M., & Sujatna, E. T. S. (2019). Preponderant Modality in Students’ Engaging Argumentative Essays. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.1930
  24. Yanwar, A. P. (2020). An Analysis of the Students’ Writing Skill in Hortatory Exposition Text at the First Semester of Public Administration Study Program of the Faculty of Social and Political Science. Journal of English for Academic, 7(2), 10–20.