Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 4, 2019
Accepted
January 5, 2020
Published
February 19, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1027 Download : 739

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Taboo words are words that are strictly prohibited to be used due to the fact that they may cause misunderstanding or conflict and are not appropriate. Therefore, it is important to understand taboo words in order to avoid using inappropriate words.This studyexamines the use of taboo words by the characters in Dallas Buyers Club movie. It focuses on the types of taboo words and reasons that influence the characters to use taboo words in the movie. This study used content analysis method as the research method. The sources of data were the movie and its transcription. The researchers obtained the data from the characters’ utterances. This study finds there are five types of taboo words, namely cursing, profanity, obscenity, epithet and sexual harassment. Cursing is the most frequently taboo word used by the characters in the movie. The researchers also find that he reasons for using the taboo words are humor, psychological condition, ethnic group identity and social class. Psychological condition is the dominant reason for the characters’ use of taboo words. The result of this study provides an in-depth understanding of the usage of English taboo words in movies that might influence young English learners.

Keywords

Characters Dallas Buyers Club Taboo words Utterances

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author Biographies

Imelda Woa Wene, Sanata Dharma University

English Education Master's Study Program

Ouda Teda Ena, Sanata Dharma University

English Education Master's Study Program
How to Cite
Wene, I. W., & Ena, O. T. (2020). CURSING, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, PROFANITY, OBSCENITY AND EPITHET IN DALLAS BUYERS CLUB MOVIE. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 5(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i1.8920
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aditia, H. (2011). an Analysis of Taboo Word and Swear Word in Dustin Lee Abraham ’ S How High Movie Letters and Humanities Faculty State Islamic University “ Syarif Hidayatullah .” Retrieved from http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/4861/1/HENDRI ADITIA-FAH.PDF
  2. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words Taboo and the Censoring of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Battistella, E. L. (2005). Bad Language: are some words better than others? New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Claire, E. (1998). Dangerous English 200! An Indispensable Guide for Language Learners and Others (3rd ed.). Illinois: Delta Publishing Company.
  5. Davis, H. (1989). What makes bad language bad? Language and Communication, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(89)90002-5
  6. Gao, G. A. O. (2008). Taboo Language inSex and the City: An Analysis of Gender Differences in Using Taboo Language in Conversation. Kristinanstad University. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:224602
  7. Hashamdar, M., & Rafi, F. (2018). Social Identity and Use of Taboo Words in Angry Mood: A Gender Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(6), 623. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0806.11
  8. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  9. Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America: A Psycholinguistic Study of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards and on the Streets. 273. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/dp/155619451X
  10. Jay, T. (1999). Why We Curse. Why We Curse. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.91
  11. Jay, T. (2009a). Do Offensive Words Harm People? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(2), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015646
  12. Jay, T. (2009b). The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words. Perspectives on Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x
  13. Klerk, V. De. (1992). How taboo are taboo words for girls? Language in Society, 21(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015293
  14. Macaulay, R. K. S. (2005). Talk that Counts: Age, Gender, and Social Class Differences in Discourse. In Talk that Counts: Age, Gender, and Social Class DifferencesinDiscourse. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173819.001.0001
  15. Ningjue, Z. (2010). Taboo language on the Internet: An analysis of genderdifferences in using taboo language.Kristinanstad University. Retrieved from http://www.diva portal.org/smash/get/diva2:398136/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  16. Olsen, J. H. (2018). Bachelor Thesis Bachelor ’ s Programme in Linguistics , 180 credits Creating Verbal Weapons A Sociolinguistic Study on Taboo Words and Acceptance in Social Communities Bachelor Thesis , 15 credits.
  17. Peredaryenko, M. S., & Krauss, S. E. (2013). Calibrating the human instrument: Understanding the interviewing experience of novice qualitative researchers. Qualitative Report, 18(43), 1–17.
  18. Pezalla, A. E., Pettigrew, J., & Miller-Day, M. (2012). Researching the researcher-as-instrument: An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111422107
  19. Purba, R. (1998). Linguistic taboo in Simalungun a sociolinguistic study. IKIP Malang.
  20. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. In Evaluation Practice (Vol. 12). https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(91)90027-u
  21. Thomas, L., & Wareing, S. (2004). Language, Society and Power: An Introduction.
  22. Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000488
  23. Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. Penguin Books, 243. https://doi.org/10.2307/326846
  24. Yule, G. (2014). The Study of Language (5th ed.). Retrieved from http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co:2048/login?user=proveedor&pass=danue0a0&url=http://bibliotecavirtual.unad.edu.co:2051/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=387929&lang=es&site=eds-live&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-42