Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 29, 2021
Accepted
October 26, 2022
Published
November 29, 2022
Download
View PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 580 Download : 1008

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis komponen literasi sains pada buku teks biologi kelas XI untuk materi sistem peredaran darah pada manusia. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada bulan April-Juni 2021. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode penelitian analisis isi. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling. Dari teknik tersebut diperoleh tiga buku biologi dari dua penerbit yang banyak digunakan di SMA dan MA se-Kecamatan Singaparna. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji reliabilitas interater dengan menghitung koefisien kappa antara dua coder dan menghitung persentase kesepakatan antar coder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengkategorian antara coder 1 dan coder 2 dapat diterima (nilai kappa buku A=0,892, 95%; buku B = 0,840, 92%; dan buku C = 0,908,95%). Persentase sebaran komponen literasi sains pada tiga buku teks biologi kelas XI materi sistem peredaran darah yang dianalisis adalah 65,75%, untuk indikator I (Pengetahuan tentang sains), 15,44% untuk indikator III (sains sebagai cara berpikir), 12,27% untuk indikator II (sifat investigasi sains) dan 6,54% untuk indikator IV (interaksi sains, teknologi dan masyarakat).

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Diana Hernawati, Resti Pujiyanti, Dea Diella

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Starting from Volume 6 Issue 1, the copyright holder of the article is the author

The Journal allows the author (s) to hold the copyright without restriction.

The Jurnal allows the author (s) to retain publishing rights without restriction.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms

How to Cite
Pujiyanti, R., Hernawati, D., & Diella, D. (2022). Analisis Komponen Literasi Sains Pada Buku Teks Biologi Kelas XI. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 6(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.6.2.126-135
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aldahmash, A. H., & Alamri, N. M. (2020). An Analysis of the Inclusion of Mathematical Discourse Components in Arabic Mathematical Textbooks: The Case of Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(November), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.534803
  2. Board, E. (1991). World Conference on Education for All. World Leisure & Recreation, 33(2), 43–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10261133.1991.9673767
  3. Chabalengula, V. M., Mumba, F., Lorsbach, T., & Moore, C. (2008). Curriculum and Instructional Validity of the Scientific Literacy Themes Covered in Zambian High School Biology Curriculum. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(4), 207–220. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.usherbrooke.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ894861&site=ehost-live
  4. Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280808
  5. Co-operation, O. F. O. R. E. (2005). Learning for tomorrow’s world: first results from Pisa 2003. Choice Reviews Online, 42(11), 42-6627-42–6627. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-6627
  6. Douglas G. Altman. (1991). Douglas G. Altman - Practical statistics for medical research-Chapman & Hall_CRC (1991).pdf (p. 611). p. 611.
  7. Fatonah, S., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2014). Pembelajaran sains (p. 179). p. 179.
  8. Ginting, V. E. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Literasi Sains Buku Teks Biologi Kelas Xi Pada Materi Sistem Saraf Di Sma Se- Kecamatan Pancurbatu Tahun Pembelajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v6i1.8900
  9. Kemendikbud, Solihin, L., Utama, B., Pratiwi, I., Novirina, Widjaja, I., … Zaenuri, M. (2019). Indeks Aktivitas Literasi Membaca 34. In Mobile Devices: Tools and Technologies. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=xss9DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=pengertian+unity&ots=8jiXmjqV6g&sig=F762ZZVgGQ1rzOdDvQmGTPskMcE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false%0Ahttp://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/13033/1/Puslitjakdikbud_Indeks Aktivitas Litera
  10. Kementerian Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional. (2019). Peta Jalan SDGs Indonesia Menuju 2030. 42–44. Retrieved from http://sdgs.bappenas.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Roadmap_Bahasa-Indonesia_File-Upload.pdf
  11. Kurnia, F., . Z., & Fathurohman, A. (2014). Analisis Bahan Ajar Fisika Sma Kelas Xi Di Kecamatan Indralaya Utara Berdasarkan Kategori Literasi Sains. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.36706/jipf.v1i1.1263
  12. Leonard, W. H., & Penick, J. E. (1993). What’s Important in Selecting a Biology Textbook? American Biology Teacher, 55(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449572
  13. Mahmood, K. (2010). Textbook Evaluation in Pakistan : Issue of Conformity to the National Curriculum Guidelines Textbooks development , evaluation and approval in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 32(1), 15–36.
  14. Mochamad Irsyan, S., Setiawan, A., & Rusnayati, H. (2013). Analisis buku ajar fisika SMA kelas x di kota Bandung berdasarkan komponen literasi sains. Prosidings Seminar Nasional Fisika 2013, 94–102.
  15. Ni’mah, F. (2019). Research trends of scientific literacy in Indonesia: Where are we? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20862
  16. Penney, K., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Clark, G. (2003). The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison to media reports of science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 3(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150309556580
  17. Wijayanto, T. D., & Purworini, D. (2018). Respon pemerintah pada aksi damai 411 dan 212: Analisis isi harian Kompas edisi November 2016 – Desember 2016. Komuniti, 10(1), 11–25.
  18. Wilkinson, J. (1999). A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes. Research in Science Education, 29(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461600
  19. Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literature Review. Jurnal Bio Education, 2, 50–58.