Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 51 Download : 19

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The use of AGP in broiler farming is for disease treatment and anti-stress, and AGP is also used to stimulate broiler growth. However, continuous use of AGP has been prohibited because it causes resistance to pathogenic bacteria and causes residue for consumers. Therefore, it is important to find a safe replacement for AGP, which can be done using synbiotics. This study aims to determine the effect of providing synbiotics from probiotic Probio_FM and prebiotic Mannan Oligosaccharide (MOS) in the diet on broiler carcass weight. The design used in this research was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 5 treatments and 4 replications. The treatment in this study consisted of P0: Commercial ration + 0% Synbiotic from Probio_FM and MOS, P1: Commercial ration + 0.25 % Synbiotic from Probio_FM and MOS, P2: Cormersil ration + 0.50% Synbiotic from Probio_FM and MOS, P3: Cormersil ration + 0.75% Synbiotic from Probio_FM and MOS, P4: Commercial ration+1% Synbiotic from Probio_FM and MOS. The variables observed in this research were feed consumption, slaughter weight, absolute carcass weight and relative carcass weight. Data were analyzed using variance analysis (ANOVA) with Duncan's advanced test. The results showed that the addition of synbiotics from Probio_FM and MOS had a significant effect (P˂0.05) on feed consumption, slaughter weight and absolute carcass weight but had no significant impact (P˃0.05) on relative carcass weight. It was concluded that administering synbiotics from Probio_FM and MOS at 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1% in the ration could increase broiler chicken carcass weight. The research conclusion of the study was that giving synbiotics from Probio_FM and MOS was more effective at a level of 0.25% -0,5%, which was able to increase broiler carcass weight.

Keywords

Probio_FM mannan oligosaccharide slaughter weight carcass weight

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author who submits the manuscript must understand and agree that Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia holds the copyrights published. Copyright includes rights to reproduce, distribute and sell every part of journal articles in all forms and media. This is a copyright transfer form (Download) signed by the corresponding author.

All articles published in Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms if you follow the license terms.

How to Cite
Sihite, H. R., Mairizal, M., & Akmal, A. (2024). Effect of Synbiotics Administering Probiotics_FM and MOS In the Ration on Broiler Carcass Weight. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 19(3), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.19.3.170-175
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anwar, P., Jiyanto., and Santi, M. A. 2019. Percentage of carcasses, carcass parts and abdominal fat for broilers with andaliman (Zanthoxylum acanthopodium DC) supplementation in the ration. Journal of Tropical Livestock, 20(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtapro.2019.020.02.10.
  2. Dunislawska, A., Slawinska, A., Stadnicka, K., Bednarczyk, M., Gulewicz, P., Jozefiak, D., and Siwek, M. 2017. Synbiotics for broiler chickens - In vitro design and evaluation of the effect on host and selected microbiota populations following in ovo delivery. Journal of the Public Library of Science, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168587.
  3. Hartono, E. F., Iriyanti, N., and Suhermiyati, S. 2016. The effect of using synbiotics on the myclophora condition and intestinal histology of male Sentul chickens. Agripet Journal, 16(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.17969/agripet.v16i2.5179.
  4. Haryati, T. 2011. Probiotics and prebiotics as feed additives for nonruminants. Wartazoan Journal, 21(3), 648–649.
  5. Hendalia, E., Manin, F., Asra, R., and Heldal. 2017. Application of Probio_FM Plus through drinking water in broiler chickens at Politani Kupang. The Application of Probio_FM Plus through drinking water in broilers at Politani Kupang. In Journal of Animal Science Vol. 20(1)
  6. Indariyah, SPJ, T. N., and Ismunarti, D. H. 2013. Study of the use of mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) on the survival and growth of artemia. Journal of Marine Research, 2(3), 41–49. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jmr/article/view/3131.
  7. Jumiati, S., Nuraini, N., and Aka, R. 2017. Slaughter weight, carcass, giblets and abdominal fat of ginger broiler chickens (Curcumaxanthorrhiza, Roxb) in feed. Journal of Tropical Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, 4(3), 11. https://doi.org/10.33772/jitro.v4i3.3634.
  8. Juniarti, N., Ngitung, R., and Hiola, S. F. 2019. The effect of providing seaweed flour in broiler chicken diets on fat and cholesterol levels. BIONATURE" Journal of Biology Studies, Research and Teaching" 20(1):64-78.
  9. Kompiang, I. P. 2009. Utilization of microorganisms as probiotics to increase poultry production in Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Innovation Development, 2(3), 177–191.
  10. Meidi, R Riyanti, Rudi S and Dian S 2018. The effect of giving Indigofera zollingeriana in the ration on slaughter weight, carcass weight and non-carcass weight of Peking ducks. Journal of Animal Husbandry Research and Innovation 2(3):1015.
  11. Nahak, A. T. 2019. The effect of adding probio in feed on live weight, carcass weight, breast weight, upper thigh and lower thigh weight of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science, 4(2), 18–20.
  12. Nova, T. D., Heryandi, Y., and Surbakti, W. S. B. 2019. Adlibitum feeding and day and night feed percentage schedule on final weight, carcass, abdominal fat and intestinal thickness in male laying hens. Indonesian Animal Husbandry Journal, 21(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.21.3.205-219.2019.
  13. Satimah, S., Yunianto, V. D., and Wahyono, F. 2019. Relative weight and length of the small intestine of broiler chickens fed a diet using microparticle egg shells with probiotic lactobacillus sp supplementation. Indonesian Journal of Animal Science, 14(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.14.4.396-403.
  14. Subekti, K., Abbas, H., & Zura, K. A. (2012). Carcass Quality (Carcass Weight, Percentage of Carcass and Abdominal Fat) of Broiler Chickens Given a Combination of CPO (Crude Palm Oil) and Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) in the Ration as Anti-Stress. Indonesian Animal Husbandry Journal, October, 14(3).
  15. Suryanah, Nur, H., and Anggraeni. 2016. Effect of cation anion balance of different diets on carcass weight and giblet weight of broiler chickens. Journal of Indonesian Animal Husbandry, 2(1), 1–8.
  16. Verawati, T. A., and Nurcahyo, H. 2023. The effect of giving probiotics Lactic Acid Bacteria (Lactobacillus sp.) on the number of lymphocytes, heterophils, eosinophils and monocytes in broiler chickens. Kingdom (The Journal of Biological Studies), 9(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.21831/kingdom.v9i1.18169.
  17. Yani, F., Muslim, and Khairi, F. 2020. The effect of providing White Flower bush leaves (Chromolaena odorata) in the diet on the performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Centers (JAC), 2(1), 33–39.
  18. Zulfikar, M. I., Berliana, B., Nelwida, N., and Nurhayati, N. 2022. Effect of using turmeric flour in rations containing black garlic (Black Garlic) on broiler carcass weight and abdominal fat. Scientific Journal of Animal Science, 25(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiiip.v25i1.178544.