Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 81 Download : 33

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the profile of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) in goat milk-fed pineapple peel silage.  The pineapple waste was milled and mixed with 5% (w/w) of rice brand, put into an anaerobic plastic bag, and stored for 21 days to produce pineapple peel silage.  The materials used in this research were 12 female Etawa cross-breed dairy goats allocated into randomized block designs with four kinds of feed treatments and three groups of lactation periods.  The feed treatments were P0 (60% forage + 40% concentrate); P1 (30% forage + 30% pineapple peel silage + 40% concentrate); P2 (15% forage + 45% pineapple peel silage + 40% concentrate); P3 (60% pineapple peel silage + 40% concentrate). Forage contains native grass and rubber leaves.  The concentrate consists of 58% bran, 25% fine corn, 6% soybean meal, 9% coconut meal, 1% mineral mixture, and 1% salt.  The variables observed were feed consumption, fat milk, and short-chain and medium-chain milk fatty acids.  The data obtained were analyzed using ANOVA, and if there were differences between treatments, a Duncan test.  The result of this study showed that the use of pineapple peel silage as a forage source had affected the feed consumption (P<0.05) but did not significantly affect SCFA acid and MCFA profile (P> 0.05) in goat milk.  Using pineapple peel silage as forage replacement up to 45 % in Fed, the dairy Ettawa cross-breed (EC) goat’s diet significantly affects the short-chain and medium-chain fatty acids profile.  The content of short-chain fatty acids and medium-chain fatty acids in goat's milk decreases, and there is no musty smell due to the addition of pineapple peel silage in the feed.

Keywords

pineapple peel silage forage fatty acid goat milk

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author who submits the manuscript must understand and agree that Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia holds the copyrights published. Copyright includes rights to reproduce, distribute and sell every part of journal articles in all forms and media. This is a copyright transfer form (Download) signed by the corresponding author.

All articles published in Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows:

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

You are free to:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms if you follow the license terms.

How to Cite
Raguati, R., Afzalani, A., Elymaizar, Z., Sulaksana, I., & Farizal, F. (2024). Short and Medium-chain Fatty Acid Profile of Goat Milk Fed with Pineapple Peel Silage. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 19(3), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.19.3.139-144
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akgül, F.Y., H. G. Ceylan, A. F. Atasoy. 2020. Determination of fatty acids profiles and volatile compounds of cows’ and goats’ butter. International J. Agric. Environ. and Food Sci. 4 (1):7-13. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.1.2
  2. Alcala, L. M. R., M. P. C. Gomez, L. L. Pimentel, J. Fontecha. 2017. Milk fat components with potential anticancer activity. Bioscience Reports. 37 BSR20170705 . Portland Press. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20170705
  3. AOAC. 2012. AOAC INTERNATIONAL Methods Committee Guidelines for Validation of Microbiological Methods for Food and Environmental Surfaces. AOAC Standards Development
  4. Bernard L., M. Bonnet, C. Delavaud, M. Delosière, A. Ferlay, H. Fougère, B. Graulet. 2018. Milk Fat Globule in Ruminant: Major and Minor Compounds, Nutritional Regulation and Differences Among Species. J. Euro.Lipid Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201700039
  5. BPS. 2024. Fruit Crop Production, 2021-2023. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-produksi-tanaman-buah-buahan.html
  6. Djordjevic, J., T Ledina, M Z Baltic, D Trbovic, M Babic and S Bulajic. 2019. Fatty acid profile of milk. Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 333. 012057. p.1-6. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/333/1/012057. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/333/1/012057/pdf
  7. Getaneh, G., A Mebrat, A. Wubie & H. Kendie. 2016. Review on Goat Milk Composition and its Nutritive Value Review on Goat Milk Composition and its Nutritive Value. J. of Nutr. Health Sci. 3(4):401. https://doi.org/10.15744/2393-9060.3.401
  8. Gowda N.K.S., N.C. Vallesha, V.B. Awachat, S. Anandan, D.T. Pal, C.S. Prasad. 2015. Study on Evaluation Of Silage From Pineapple (Ananas comosus) Fruit Residue As Livestock Feed. J. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 47(3):557–61; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0762-2
  9. Hamzaoui S., G. Caja, X. Such,E. Albanell and A. K. Salama. 2021. Effect of Soybean Oil Supplementation on Milk Production, Digestibility, and Metabolism in Dairy Goats under Thermoneutral and Heat Stress Conditions. J. animals. 11(2), 350. p.1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020350
  10. Juráček, M, P. Vašeková, D. Bíro, M. Šimko, B. Gálik, M. Rolinec, O. Hanušovský, R. Kolláthová, P. Kovár, N. Andruška. 2020. The effect of different feeding systems on fatty acids composition of cow’s milk. J. Acta fytotechn zootechn, 23, (1): 37–41. https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.01.37-41
  11. Kuswanto, A., R.Raguati, Z.Elimayzar, I.Sulaksana. 2022. Replacement of Elephant Grass with Probiotic Supplied Palm Middle in Feed on The Production of Cross-breed Etawah Goat Milk. J. Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan Vol. 25 No 2.p.100-106. DOI: 10.22437/jiiip.v25i2.19080.
  12. Kyawt Y.Y., K. S. Win., K. S. Mu, A. Aung, M. Aung. 2020. Feeding Pineapple Waste Silage As A Roughage Source Improved The Nutrient Intakes, Energy Status, And Growth Performances Of Myanmar's Local Cattle. J. of Advanced Veterinary And Animal Research. Vol 7, No. 3,p.436–441. http://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2020.g439
  13. Maulidya, A., Y. Armia, Dzarnisa. 2023. The Effect of Addition of Ark Serai Blok and Eggshell Flour with Different Percentages on Etawa Peranakan Goat Milk Quality. J. Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pertanian. 8 (4).www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/JFP
  14. Mollica, M.P., G. Trinchese, F. Cimmino, E. Penna, G. Cavaliere, R. Tudisco, N. Musco, C. Manca, A. Catapano, M. Monda, P. Bergamo, S. Banni, F. Infascelli, P. Lombardi, and M. Crispino. 2021. Milk Fatty Acid Profiles in Different Animal Species: Focus on the Potential Effects of Selected PUFAs on Metabolism and Brain Functions. J. Nutrients. 13, 1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041111
  15. Raguati, Jamarun, N., Musnandar, E., 2015. Exploration of Natural Probiotics From Pineapple Peels (Ananas Comosus) as a Source of Feed Supplements for Ruminants.
  16. Raguati. 2016. Exploration of Probiotic Bacteria from Pineapple Peel and Its Use Feed to Increase the Production of Etawah Dairy Goat Milk. Dissertation. Unand, Padang
  17. Ravari, F. N., R. Tahmasbi, O.Dayani, A. Khezri. 2022. Cactus-alfalfa blends silage as an alternative feedstuff for Saanen dairy goats: Effect on feed intake, milk yield, and components, blood, and rumen parameters. J. Small Ruminant Research Vol. 216, 106811. ELSEVIER. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106811
  18. Roda, A. and M. Lambri. 2019. Food uses of pineapple waste and by-products: a review. J. Institute of Food Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14128
  19. Salama, A. A. K., A.C. Jodar, S. Love, N. Mehaba, X. Such & G.Caja. 2020. Milk Yield, Milk Composition, And Milk Metabolomics Of Dairy Goats Intramammary-Challenged With Lipopolysaccharide Under Heat Stress Conditions. Scientific Reports. 10:5055 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61900-8
  20. Stergiadiss, N. P. Nørskov, S. Purup, I. Givens and M. R. F. Lee. 2019. Comparative Nutrient Profiling of Retail Goat and Cow Milk. J. Nutrients. 11(10). 2282. p. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11102282
  21. Tasse, A.M. and Aka, R. 2013. Asam lemak trans (trans-C18:1) dalam susu kambing. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 24 (1): 26 – 32 .ISSN: 0852-3581.
  22. Tuminah, S. 2009. Saturated Fatty Acid Effects and No Fatty Acids Saturated Trans to Health. Media Research and Health Developers Volume XIX
  23. Vieitez, I., B. Irigaray, N. Callejas, V. González, S. Gimenez, A. Arechavaleta, M Grompone, A. Gámbaro. 2016. Composition of Fatty Acids And Triglycerides In Goat Cheeses And Study of The Triglyceride Composition of Goat Milk And Cow Milk Blends. J. of Food Composition and Analysis. 48, P. 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2016.02.010
  24. Voloshyna I. M., , K. I. Soloshenko, I. V. Lych , L. V. Shkotova. 2021. Practical Use Of Goat Milk And Colostrum. J. Biotechnologia ACTA, V. 14. No 5. P.38-48 https://doi.org/10.15407/biotech14.05.038
  25. Yakan, A., H. Özkan, A. E. Şakar, C. T. Ates, N. Ünal, Ö. Koçak, G. Doğruer, C. Özbeyaz. 2019. Milk yield and quality traits in different lactation stages of Damascus goats: Concentrate and pasture-based feeding systems. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 66(2). 117-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.547470