Article Sidebar

Submitted
19 July 2023
Accepted
22 March 2024
Published
28 March 2024
Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 183 Download : 168

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the logical feasibility, empirical and numeracy ability profile of students. Product development of the Minimum Competency Assessment (MCA)  numerical instrument PISA model with the context of Musi Rawas for 5th grade Elementary School. This research is a Research and Development (R&D) study and used the ADDIE model. The subjects of the research was the 5th grade students of SDN 1 Terawas, totaling 20 students to test eligibility empirically, and the 5th grade students of SDN Pasenan, totaling 18 students to analyze the profile of numeracy abilities. The numerical MCA consists of 17 questions in the form of multiple choice, complex multiple choice, and matching which are arranged using the MCA numeracy cognitive level and PISA 1-3 levels. Data data logically validity results has an index of more than 0.4 and is declared valid and logical. The results of empirical validity are 16 valid questions and 1 invalid question. The reliability value is 0.89 as "very high" category. Then the resulting product is 16 questions that are empirically feasible. For the analysis of the numeracy ability profile obtained from the average student numeracy MCA test scores based on the scores of each MCA level and PISA numeracy level it is known that the average student score at level 1 (comprehension) is 64, level 2 (implementation) the average student score namely 69, level 3 (reasoning) the average value of students is 57.

Keywords

Minimum Competency Assessment, Musi Rawas Context, Numeracy, PISA Model Minimum Competency Assessment, Musi Rawas Context, Numeracy, PISA Model

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Trie Utari, Agus Susanta, Irwan Koto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .
How to Cite
Utari, T., Susanta, A., & Koto, I. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Numerasi Model Pisa Dengan Konteks Musi Rawas Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v3i1.29016
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anifaruzki Amalia, Rusdi, K. (2021). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Bermuatan HOTS Setara PISA Berkonteks Pancasila. 05(01), 1–19. https://j cup.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/386
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  3. Azwar, S. (2012). Reabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Belajar.
  4. DITPSD Kemdikbud. (2022). Asesmen Nasional. Diakses pada tanggal 20 November 2022, dari https://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/hal/asesmen-nasional.
  5. Hadi, Sutarto. (2017). Pendidikan Matematika Realistik: Teori, pengembangan, dan Implementsasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  6. Hartono, R., Winarni, E. W., & Koto, I. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Higher Order Thingking Skills ( HOTS ) pada Pembelajaran IPA Siswa Kelas IV SDN 21 Bengkulu Tengah. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dasar (Kapedas), 2(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/kapedas.v1i2.21670
  7. Hasibuan, S. A., Fauzi, K. M. A., & Mukhtar, M. (2019). Development of PISA Mathematical Problem Model on the Content of Change and Relationship to Measure Students Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6274
  8. Hendroanto, A., Istiandaru, A., Syakrina, N., Setyawan, F., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Hidayat, A. S. E. (2018). How Students Solves PISA Tasks: An Overview of Students’ Mathematical Literacy. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 2(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.10713
  9. Indahri, Y., Penelitian, P., Keahlian, B., Ri, D., Jenderal, J., & Subroto, G. (2021). Asesmen Nasional sebagai Pilihan Evaluasi Sistem Pendidikan Nasional National Assessment as a Choice of Evaluation to National Education System. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 12(2), 2614–5863. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v12i2.2364
  10. Johar, R. (2012). Domain Soal PISA untuk Literasi Matematika. Jurnal Peluang, 1(1), 30. https://doi.org/http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/peluang/article/view/1296/1183
  11. Julita, Winarni, E. W., & Koto, I. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Berbasis Literasi Saintifik Materi Alat Indra Manusia Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. JP3D (Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Pendidikan Dasar), 5(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/jp3d.v5i2.20476
  12. Kadir & Masi, L. (2013). Penggunaan konteks dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan keterampilan sosial siswa SMP. KNPM V (hal. 786-796). Kendari: Himpunan Matematika Indonesia. https://adoc.pub/penggunaan-konteks-dalam-pembelajaran-matematika-untuk-menin.html
  13. Kemdikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Pusmenjar Balitbang Kemdikbud. Diunduh pada 20 November 2022, dari https://pusmenjar.kemdikbud.go.id/an/page/asesmen¬ _kompetensi_minimum
  14. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3): 276-282. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900052/
  15. Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2018). Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Keunggulan Lokal. Biosfer : Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 9(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v9i1.2876
  16. OECD. (2009a). OECD, 2009a. 1, 3–126. http://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/download/2006pisa/2006PISA.pdf%5Cnhttp://pisa.nutn.edu.tw/taiwan_tw_04.htm
  17. ______. (2019). PISA 2018. PISA 2018 Result Combined Executive Summaries. PISAOECD Publishing.
  18. Purnamasari, R., Safitri, N., Kurnia, D., (2023). Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Literasi Numerasi Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1), 787 – 797. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4591
  19. Putra, Y. Y., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016a). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Konten Bilangan untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v2i1.175
  20. Rimayanti, Koto, I., & Winarni, E. W. (2022). Pengembangan Modul Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thingking Skils Berorientasi Akm Pada Mata Pelajaran Berorientasi Akm Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA SD Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Siswa. Jurnal KAPEDAS – Kajian Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 150–159. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/kapedas/index
  21. Sudijono, Anas. (2012). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo.
  22. Wasidi. (2020). Tes dan Pengukuran Pendidikan. Jakarta Barat:Halaman Moeka Publihing.
  23. Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Soal HOTS 2018. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Depdikbud.
  24. Winarni, E., W. (2018). Teori dan Praktik Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) Research And Development (R&D). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  25. Zulfah, Z. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Soal Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v2i1.27