Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- Chairani, Z. 2015. Scaffolding dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI 28 Jan 2015.
- Contant, T., Tweed, A., Bass, J., & Carin, A. (2018). Teaching Science-Through Inquiry Based Instruction. United State: Pearson Education.
- Elliot, J., (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Latifa, B. R., Verawati, N. S., & Harjono, A. (2017). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 5e (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaboration, & Evaluate) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir. J. Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3, 61-67.
- Molenaar, I, van Boxtel, C.A.M., & Sleegers, P.J.C., (2011), Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement, Instructional Science, 39, 785-803.
- Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Krajcik, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Edelson, E. (2004), A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry, The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.
- Reigosa, C., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., (2007), Scaffolded Problem-solving in the Physics and Chemistry Laboratory: Difficulties hindering students’ assumption of responsibility, Inter. Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 307 – 329.
- Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
- Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2016). Assesment Pembelajaran. (D. Ispurwanti, Ed.) Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
- van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen (2010), Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research, Educational Psychology Review, 2 (3), pp 271–296.
References
Chairani, Z. 2015. Scaffolding dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI 28 Jan 2015.
Contant, T., Tweed, A., Bass, J., & Carin, A. (2018). Teaching Science-Through Inquiry Based Instruction. United State: Pearson Education.
Elliot, J., (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Latifa, B. R., Verawati, N. S., & Harjono, A. (2017). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 5e (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaboration, & Evaluate) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir. J. Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 3, 61-67.
Molenaar, I, van Boxtel, C.A.M., & Sleegers, P.J.C., (2011), Metacognitive scaffolding in an innovative learning arrangement, Instructional Science, 39, 785-803.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Krajcik, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Edelson, E. (2004), A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry, The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.
Reigosa, C., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., (2007), Scaffolded Problem-solving in the Physics and Chemistry Laboratory: Difficulties hindering students’ assumption of responsibility, Inter. Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 307 – 329.
Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2016). Assesment Pembelajaran. (D. Ispurwanti, Ed.) Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen (2010), Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research, Educational Psychology Review, 2 (3), pp 271–296.