Bilah Samping Artikel

Unduh
PDF (English)
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 403 Unduh : 2041

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

Penerapan asesmen formatif secara reguler pada pembelajaran IPA telah dibuktikan manfaatnya oleh banyak penelitian dan dipraktekkan pada pendidikan di banyak negara maju bahkan sejak dua dekade silam. Namun pengadopsian praktik asesmen formatif di Indonesia belum sesuai ekspektasi karena beberapa faktor seperti pengetahuan, persepsi, hingga berbagai hambatan yang dihadapi guru. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pemahaman dan persepsi guru terhadap asesmen formatif dan berbagai kendala yang ditemui pada realisasinya di kelas dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif secara exploratori. Analisis Chi-Square juga digunakan untuk mencari hubungan atar variabel.  Data diperoleh dengan menyebarkan kuesioner secara daring yang diisi oleh 69 orang guru rumpun IPA di kabupaten Wonosobo serta wawancara pada 5 orang guru dengan profil yang berbeda. Penelitian ini berhasil mengidentifikasi bahwa pemahaman konsep dan persepsi terhadap asesmen formatif pada kategori Cukup Baik yang membuktikan guru sudah memahami konsep asesmen formatif dan memiliki persepsi yang positif. Terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan antara pelatihan dengan pemahaman guru dan antara pemahaman dengan frekuensi penerapan asesmen formatif di kelas. Akan tetapi guru-guru menyatakan masih belum menerapkan asesmen formatif di kelas secara rutin. Guru menganggap kendala terbesar yang ditemui adalah jumlah siswa yang terlalu banyak, keterbatasan waktu, kurangnya pengetahuan praktis dan pelatihan yang kurang intensif dan tidak tepat.

Kata Kunci

Formative Assessment Science Teacher Comprehension Perception Challenge Application

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Ismun Nisa Nadhifah, Agista Sintia Dewi Adila, Ayu Lestari

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip
Nadhifah, I. N., Adila, A. S. D., & Lestari, A. (2023). Description of Comprehension, Perceptions, and Challenges of Science Teachers’ Formative Assessment Practice in Wonosobo. PendIPA Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.7.1.14-23
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Referensi

  1. Ahmedi, V. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes and practices towards formative assessment in primary schools. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 161–175.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 179-211.
  3. Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A Case Study of Teacher Personal Practice Assessment Theories and Complexities of Implementing Formative Assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 956-983.
  4. Cisterna, D., & Gotwals, A. W. (2018). Enactment of Ongoing Formative Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Development and Practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 200-222.
  5. Cowie, B., & Harrison, C. (2016). Classroom Processes That Support Effective Assessment. In G. Brown, & L. Harris, Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment (pp. 335–350). Auckland: Routledge.
  6. Crichton, H., & McDaid, A. (2016). Learning intentions and success criteria: Learners’ and teachers’ views. The Curriculum Journal, 190-203.
  7. DeLuca, C., Chapman-Chin, A., & Klinger, D. A. (2019). Toward a Teacher Professional Learning Continuum in Assessment for Learning. Educational Assessment, 267-285.
  8. Dylan Wiliam, M. T. (2017). Integrating Assessment with Learning: What Will It Take to Make It Work? In C. A. Dwyer, The Future of Assessment (pp. 51-80). New York: Routledge.
  9. Enu, J. (2021). Factors affecting teacher educators adoption of formative assessment strategies in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 483-489.
  10. Furtak, E. M., Kiemer, K., Circi, R. K., Swanson, R., de León, V., Morrison, D., & Heredia, S. C. (2016). Teachers’ formative assessment abilities and their relationship to student learning: findings from a four-year intervention study. Instructional Science, 267-291.
  11. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  12. Hamodi, C., López-Pastor, V. M., & López-Pastor, A. T. (2017). If I experience formative assessment whilst studying at university, will I put it into practice later as a teacher? Formative and shared assessment in Initial Teacher Education (ITE). European Journal of Teacher Education, 171-190.
  13. Heitink, M., Van der Kleij, F., Veldkamp, B., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 50-62.
  14. Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 353-376.
  15. Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 353-376.
  16. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: a case‐study of a whole‐school approach. The Curriculum Journal, 193-206.
  17. Kemp, S., & Scaife, J. (2012). Misunderstood and neglected? Diagnostic and formative assessment practices of lecturers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 181-192.
  18. Koloi-Keaikitse, S. (2016). Assessment training: a precondition for teachers’ competencies and use of classroom assessment practices. International Journal of Training and Development, 107-123.
  19. Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34-50.
  20. Linquanti, R., & Wested. (2014). Supporting Formative Assessment for Deeper Learning: A Primer for Policymakers. Retrieved from the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC: https://www.michigan.gov/-/media/Project/Websites/mde/2018/03/05/CCSSO_Supporting_Formative_Assessment_for_Deeper_Learning.pdf?rev=4b717f530c7b44d6b2da3e9322884cd5
  21. Moss, C. M., Brookhart, S. M., & Long, B. A. (2013). Administrators' Roles in Helping Teachers Use Formative Assessment Information. Applied Measurement in Education, 205-2018.
  22. Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 129-132.
  23. Rajendran, M. (2022). Sociocultural Perspective on Assessment for Learning: Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 4567-4570.
  24. Ruiz, M. A., Erin, P., Furtak, M., Ayala, C., Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Fomative Assessment, Motivation, and Science Learning. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek, Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 140-142). New York: Taylor & Francis.
  25. Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Stoyanov, S., & Spech, M. (2014). Quality indicators for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 117-132.
  26. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  27. Tebeje, M., & Abiyu, A. (2015). Improving Implementation of Formative Continuous Assessment at College of Agriculture, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia. ournal of Education and Practice, 110-116.
  28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  29. Wilson, N. S. (2008). Teachers expanding pedagogical content knowledge: learning about formative assessment together. Journal of In-Service Education, 283-298.
  30. Yan, Z., Li, Z., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang, L., & Lao, H. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 228-260.