Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to (1) know the influence of implementing the practicum-based CTL model in learning on the cognitive learning outcomes of students studying colloids in class XI SMA Swasta Bersama Berastagi (2) determine the correlation between affective scores and student learning outcomes in the application of the CTL model based on colloid subject matter practicum for class XI SMA Swasta Bersama Berastagi; (3) determine the correlation between psychomotor scores and student learning outcomes in the application of the CTL model based on colloid subject matter practicum for class XI SMA Swasta Bersama Berastagi. The research used a pretest-posttest control group design. Based on research that has been carried out, the average score obtained by experimental class students in the initial test (pretest) was 59 and the final test (posttest) was 86.13. The average score of experimental class students at the beginning (pretest) was 53.92 and the final test (posttest) was 75.25. Student learning outcomes using learning models Contextual Teaching and Learning Practicum Based experienced an increase of 67% in the medium category. This increase can be proven by the results of the hypothesis test which obtained tcount > ttable, namely 5.58 > 1.72, which proves that student learning outcomes by applying the CTL model based on class XI colloid practicum subject matter are not the same as student learning outcomes who apply the conventional model.

Keywords

Learning Models, Contextual Teaching And Learning, Colloids, Learning Outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Juniar, A., & Tarigan, C. M. B. (2024). The Effect of Implementing Practicum-Based Contextual Teaching and Learning Models to Improve Learning Outcomes on the Subject of Colloids. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.57-64

References

  1. Al Idrus, S. W., Purwoko, A. A., Hadisaputra, S., & Junaidi, E. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Praktikum Kimia Lingkungan Berbasis Green Chemistry Pada Mata Kuliah Kimia Lngkungan. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(5), 541-547.
  2. Andini, V. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran ctl (contextual teaching and learning) berbasis praktikum pada materi pencemaran lingkungan terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik di kelas x (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Palangka Raya)
  3. Annisa, F., Annisa, R. N., Yunita, T., Rafifah, T., & Vichaully, Y. (2023). Peran Mata Kuliah Microteaching dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Guru Mengajar di Kelas. Journal on Education, 5(2), 1564-1569.
  4. Anwar, S. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (Ctl) Dalam Pembelajaran Inklusi. Jurnal Ilmiah
  5. Azila, S. N., Laila K. M., Wiwin P. H., & Fatimatul M. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning) Berbantuan Wayang dalam Pembelajaran IPA terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Natural Science Education Rea]search. 1(2), 155-162.
  6. Cahyono, H. (2019). Faktor-faktor kesulitan belajar siswa MIN Janti. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 1-4.
  7. Dakhi, A. S. (2020). Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Education and development, 8(2), 468-468.
  8. Damanik, R., Sagala, R. W., & Rezeki, T. I. (2021). Keterampilan dasar mengajar guru (Vol. 1). umsu press.
  9. Darimi, I. (2016). Diagnosis kesulitan belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran aktif di sekolah. JURNAL EDUKASI: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 2(1), 30-43.
  10. Lestari, W. P., Ningsih, E. F., Choirudin, C., Sugianto, R., & Lestari, A. S. B. (2023). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dengan Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, 1(1), 28-33.
  11. Mudatsir, M., Ramli, R. B., & Mustakim, M. (2023). Optimalisasi Keterampilan Mengajar Guru Melalui Supervisi Klinis Kepala Sekolah Pendekatan Kolaboratif Era Merdeka Belajar. ARSEN: Jurnal Penelitian Pendididikan, 1(1), 39-49.
  12. Muharmansyah, R., Rahmi, U., Imamuddin, M., & Rahmat, T. (2023). Pengaruh Persepsi Siswa Tentang Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar Guru terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6986-6993.
  13. Muhartini, M., Mansur, A., & Bakar, A. (2023). Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dan Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning. Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(1), 66-77.
  14. Nababan, D., & Sipayung, C. A. (2023). Pemahaman Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Dalam Model Pembelajaran (Ctl). Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(2), 825-837.
  15. Nabillah, T., & Abadi, A. P. (2020). Faktor penyebab rendahnya hasil belajar siswa. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(1c).
  16. Naik, G., Chitre, C., Bhalla, M., & Rajan, J. (2020). Impact of use of technology on student learning outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale experiment in India. World Development, 120(1).
  17. Nurrita, T. (2018). Pengembangan media pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal misykat, 3(1), 171-187.
  18. Prasetya, D., Rasmawan, R., & Hadi, L. (2021). Pengembangan chemistry quartet card (chemqurca) pada materi sistem koloid di SMA Negeri 8 Pontianak. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(2), 36-41.
  19. Simangunsong, A., Mege, R. A., & Lihiang, A. (2023). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching And Learning (CTL) Berbasis Praktikum Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa. JSPB BIOEDUSAINS, 4(1), 83-88.
  20. Suardi, M (2018). Belajar & Pembelajaran. Deepublish
  21. Sunismi, Werdiningsih, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Pembelajaran berbasis proyek (project based learning). CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi. Malang.
  22. Utami, F. N. (2020). Peranan Guru Dalam Mengatasi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SD. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 93-101.
  23. Yunita, H., Sesunan, F., Maulina, H., & Suana, W. (2021). Pembelajaran blended learning dengan metode praktikum untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika siswa SMK. Physics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 133-140.