Main Article Content

Abstract

Good teaching materials have certain criteria or certain standards, such as their relevance to the current curriculum. The STEM approach offers teachers the opportunity to introduce students to various concepts to teach teaching materials that can be integrated into natural sciences including chemistry. This research aims to describe the presentation of STEM aspects in class XI high school chemistry teaching materials regarding reaction rates. The method in this research is a qualitative descriptive method with a content analysis approach. The data source comes from three books for class XI high school chemistry teaching materials which are most widely used in Pematangsiatar City. The technique for selecting research objects uses purposive sampling technique. Data collection was carried out analyzing material based on STEM indicators. Testing the validity of the instrument uses the Gregory formula, while testing the validity of the data uses data triangulation. The results of the research show that the percentage of quotations appearing in each book, namely in book A, has aspects of Science 30%, Technology 40%, and Mathematics 30%. In book B, the Science aspect is 19.05%, Technology 42.86%, Engineering 9.52% and Mathematics 28.57%. In book C, the Science aspect is 25%, Technology 25%, Engineering 18.75% and Mathematics 31.25%. Based on the total occurrence of STEM aspect indicators, the order of teaching materials that fulfill the STEM aspect is Book B > Book C > Book A, so that Book B has the highest number of occurrences of STEM aspect quotes.

Keywords

Analysis teaching materials chemistry STEM : Analisis; bahan ajar; kimia; STEM

Article Details

How to Cite
Pane, E. P. P., Simangunsong, A. D. B., Sidabutar, R., & Simarmata, G. (2024). Analisis Bahan Ajar Kimia SMA/MA Berdasarkan Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematic (STEM): -. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.1.35-40

References

  1. Agnezi, L. A., Khair, N., & Yolanda, S. 2019. Analisis Sajian Bahan ajar Fisika SMA Kelas X Semester 1 Terkait Komponen Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM). Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 3(2), 167–175.
  2. Anggraini, C. E., & Nurita, T. 2021. Analisis Bahan ajar IPA SMP Terkait Komponen STEM (Sains, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Pada Materi Tekanan Zat. Pendidikan Sains, 9(3), 282– 288.
  3. Jannah, N., Suyana, I., & Novia, H. (2019). Analisis Hakikat Sains (Nature of Science) dalam Buku Teks Fisika SMA Kelas X di Kota Bandung. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika 5.0. 160–166.
  4. Khairiyah, N. 2019. Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, dan Mathematics (STEM). SPASI Media.
  5. Laksono, P. J., Ashadi, & Saputro, S. 2016. Analis Bahan Ajar Kimia untuk SMA/MA di Kabupaten Karanganyar pada Materi Kelarutandan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 389–394.
  6. Lamb, L. R. & Annetta, L. 2013. The Use of Online Modules and the Effect on Student Outcomes in a High School Chemistry. Journal Science Education Technology, 22 (1), 603–613.
  7. Mulyani, T. 2019. Pendekatan pembelajaran STEM untuk menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0. Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana 2019. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  8. Niken Septantiningtyas, Rizal Lukman Hakim, dan Nadiya Rosmila. 2020. Konsep Dasar Sains 1. Penerbit Lakeisha.
  9. Pane, E.P. dkk, 2022. The Effect of STEM Based Learning Module on Students Learning Outcomes and Motivation in General Chemistry Courses. International Journal of Education & Curriculum Application. Vol. 5, No. 2.
  10. Rahmadana, A., & Agnesa, O. S. 2022. Deskripsi Implementasi Steam (Science, Technology, Enginering, Art, Mathematic) dan Integrasi Aspek “Art” Steam pada Pembelajaran Biologi SMA. Journal on Teacher Education, 4(1), 190-201.
  11. Ristiyani, E. & Bahriah, E.S. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Kimia Siswa di SMA N X Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 18-29.
  12. Sari, Siti Fatimah Indah, dkk. 2020. Analisis Materi Ajar Kimia SMA/MA Kelas X Pada Konsep Stoikiometri. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 11(1), 139-151.
  13. Silaban, R., Panggabean, F. T. M., Hutapea, F. M., Hutahaean, E., & Alexander, I. J. 2020. Implementasi Problem Based Learning (PBL) dan Pendekatan Ilmiah Menggunakan Media Kartu untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik tentang Mengajar Ikatan Kimia. Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(2), 69–76.
  14. Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview. Journal Of Turkish Science Education, 4 (2), 2-20.
  15. Sudrajat, D. P. 2020. Potensi Pendidikan STEM untuk Membangun View Nature of Sains and Technology (VNOST) Calon Guru Kimia. ORBITAL :JURNAL PENDIDIKAN KIMIA, 4(1), 31–43.
  16. Sunyono, I. W. Wirya, E. Suyanto, dan G. Suyadi. 2009. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kimia Berorientasi Keterampilan Generik Sains pada Siswa SMA di Lampung. Universitas Lampung.
  17. Triana, D., Anggraito, Y. U., & Ridlo, S. 2020. Effectiveness of Environmental Change Learning Tools Bases on STEM-PjBL Towards 4C Skills of Students. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(2), 181-187.
  18. Utina, H. 2020. Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa pada Materi Ikatan Kimia melalui Pendekatan STEM PBL Science. Jurnal Ideas, 179–190.
  19. Yudha, S., Saputra, O. A., Purwanto, R., & Nugraha, A. W. 2021. Analysis of Chemical Teaching Materials for Class X SMA / MA on The Discussion of The Role of Chemistry in Daily Life. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 10 (3), 109-117.