Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 131 Download : 50

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the quality of analytical thinking test instruments and the level of students' abilities through Rasch model analysis. This research used descriptive method with quantitative approach. The sample used amounted to 246 students. The instrument used was an analytical thinking test instrument totaling 9 items in the form of descriptions. Data collection was carried out by testing the test instrument. Data analysis was carried out by Rasch model analysis. The results showed that all items were fit. The level of item difficulty varies consisting of 1 very difficult question, 4 difficult questions, 3 easy questions, and 1 very easy question. Cronbach's alpha value of 0.80 is categorized as good, person reliability value of 0.79 is categorized as sufficient, and item reliability value of 0.98 is categorized as excellent. The level of item difficulty consists of 1 very difficult question, 4 difficult questions, 3 easy questions, and 1 very easy question. Person separation value 1.92 (H = 2.89, rounded to 3) and item separation 6.26 (H = 8.68 rounded to 9). Person measure analysis obtained 114 high ability (46%), 27 medium ability (11%), and 105 low ability (43%). Person fit analysis obtained 178 fits (72%), 2 misfits (1%), and 66 outliers (27%).

Keywords

Analytical Thinking; Rasch; Test Instrument.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Urai Nurbaiti, Afandi, Andi Besse Tenriawaru

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nurbaiti, U., Afandi, & Tenriawaru, A. B. (2024). Feasibility of Analytical Thinking Test Instrument: An Analysis of Test Quality and Learner Abilities Using the Rasch Model. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.3.488-497
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alfarisa, F., & Purnama, D. N. (2019). Analisis butir soal ulangan akhir semester mata pelajaran ekonomi SMA menggunakan Rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 11(2), 366-374.
  2. Andriani, R., & Lume, L. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Pertanian. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 3(03), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v3i03.555
  3. Anselmus, A., Risalah, D., & Sandie, S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes HOTS dalam Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa pada Materi Program Linear di Kelas XI SMA Sungai Kehidupan. JURING (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 4(4), 371.
  4. https://doi.org/10.24014/juring.v4i4.14295
  5. Apipatunnisa, I., Hamdu, G., & Giyartini, R. (2022). Eksplorasi kemampuan literasi dan numerasi siswa sekolah dasar dengan pemodelan rasch. COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 5(4), 668-680.
  6. Arifin, Z. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, hlm. 23-27
  7. Aryadoust, Vahid, Li Ying Ng, and H. S. (2021). A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research. Language Testing, 38(1), 6–40.
  8. Blegur, J., Rajagukguk, C. P. M., Sjioen, A. E., & Souisa, M. (2023). Innovation of Analytical Thinking Skills Instrument for Throwing and Catching Game Activities for Elementary School Students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16140a
  9. Dewi, S. S., Hariastuti, R. M., & Utami, A. U. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran Dan Daya Pembeda Soal Olimpiade Matematika (Omi) Tingkat Smp Tahun 2018. Transformasi : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 3(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v3i1.388
  10. Febriano, R., Tandililing, E., & Enawaty, E. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Model Rasch Pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 10(9), 1–12.
  11. Febriyansyah, I. A., Fadhil, R., & Zulfahrizal, Z. (2020). Pengembangan Metode Klasifikasi Biji Kopi Beras Arabika Gayo dan Robusta Gayo dengan Metode PCA (Principal Component Analysis) Berdasarkan Pengolahannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pertanian, 4(4), 472–481.
  12. https://doi.org/10.17969/jimfp.v4i4.12776
  13. Fiska, J. M., Hidayati, Y., Qomaria, N., & Hadi, W. P. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Harian Ipa Menggunakan Software Anates Pada Pendekatan Teori Tes Klasik. Natural Science Education Research, 4(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v4i1.8133
  14. Karabatsos, G. (2003). Comparing the Aberrant Response Detection Performance of ThirtySix Person-Fit Statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 277–298.
  15. Gulacar, O., Zowada, C., Burke, S., Nabavizadeh, A., Bernardo, A., & Eilks, I. (2020). Integration of a sustainability-oriented socio-scientific issue into the general chemistry curriculum: Examining the effects on student motivation and self-efficacy. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 15, 100232.
  16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100232
  17. Halik, A. S., Mania, S., & Nur, F. (2019). Analisis Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Sekolah (Uas) Mata Pelajaran Matematika Pada Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016 Smp Negeri 36 Makassar. Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 1(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v1i1.11249
  18. Hambleton, Ronald K., and H. S. (2013). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
  19. Hamdu, G., Fuadi, F. N., Yulianto, A., & Akhirani, Y. S. (2020). Items quality analysis using rasch model to measure elementary school students’ critical thinking skill on stem learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 61–74.
  20. Hanipah Sri. (2023). Analisis Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Dalam Memfasilitasi Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21 Pada Siswa Menengah Atas. Jurnal Bintang Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubpi.v1i2.1860
  21. Hetarion, Bety DS, Yosina Hetarion, and V. M. (2020). Implementasi pendidikan karakter berbasis kearifan lokal cuci negeri dalam pembelajaran IPS. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(1), 1–12.
  22. Ilma, R., Hamdani, A. S., & Lailiyah, S. (2017). Ilma 2017 Penelitian Kemampuan Analitis Rendah. 2(1), 1–14.
  23. Irawati, T. N. and M. M. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen kemampuan berpikir analisis siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika. Kadikma, 9(2), 1–11.
  24. Kiong Tze Tee, Jailani, M. Y., Razali, H., Yee, M. H., Atan, H. H., & Mimi, M. M. (2012). Thinking Skills for Secondary School Students in Malaysia. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 2(2), 12–23.
  25. Kurniawan, & Andriyani, K. D. K. (2018). Analisis Soal Pilihan Ganda dengan Rasch Model. Jurnal Statistika, 6(1), 34–39.
  26. Kusuma, A. S. K. M. D. U. R. (2021). The Development of Higher Order-Thinking Skills (HOTS) Instrument Assessment in Physics Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012140
  27. Laksono, E. W., Rohaeti, E., Suyanta, S., & Irwanto, I. (2017). The Evaluation Instrument of Analytical Thinking and Science Process Skill in Chemistry Subject. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(1), 100-110.
  28. Lestari, T. D. H. R. S. (2023). Analisis Soal Literasi Numerasi Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch Konteks Pemanasan Global Berbasis ESD Untuk Sekolah Dasar Tiara. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2), 2489-2503.
  29. Linacre, J. M. (2010). A user’s guide to Winsteps Ministep. Rasch-model computer programs.
  30. Mahyastuti, I., Dwiyana, D., & Hidayanto, E. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Analitis Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 8(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v8i1.19644
  31. Meijer, R. R., Muijtjens, A. M. M., & van der Vlueten, C. P. M. (1996). Nonparametric Person-Fit Research: Some Theoretical issues an Empirical Example. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 77–89.
  32. Miller, T. (2003). Essay assessment with latent semantic analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(4), 495–512.
  33. Rahmafitri, F., Deswita Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri, E., & Trisoni, R. (2024). Analisis Kebijakan Kurikulum Merdeka dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kualitas Pendidikan. Dirasah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 45–55. https://ejournal.iaifa.ac.id/index.php/dirasah/article/view/1050
  34. Rahmaini, A., & Taufiq, A. N. (2018). Analisis Butir Soal Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMK N 1 Sedayu Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018 (Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda dan Fungsi Distraktor pada Soal Pilihan Ganda Kelas XI). Jurnal Mudarrisuna, 8(1), 1–24.
  35. Ramadhan, M. F., Siroj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Validitas and Reliabilitas. Journal on Education, 6(2), 10967–10975. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885
  36. Ramos, Dolipas, & V. (2018). Higher Order Thinking Skillss and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Regression Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, Issue 4, p: 48-60., 4, 48–60.
  37. Rifana, F., Ramadhan, S., & Putro, K. Z. (2024). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Harian Siswa Mata Pelajaran PPKn Kelas IV Menggunakan Rach Model di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 99–110.
  38. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v7i1.424
  39. Rohmah, F. N., Susilaningsih, E., Haryani, S., & Kasmui. (2022). Desain Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca Bermuatan High Order Thinking Skills untuk Menganalisis Kompetensi Minimum Siswa Materi Asam-Basa. Chemistry in Education, 11(2), 117–125.
  40. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/chemined
  41. Rusiyah, R., Eraku, S. S., & Supadmi, S. (2020). Analisis Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Geografi Dengan Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Jurnal Swarnabhumi : Jurnal Geografi Dan Pembelajaran Geografi, 5(1), 11.
  42. https://doi.org/10.31851/swarnabhumi.v5i1.4136
  43. Rusmayani. (2020). Analisis Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SMP Bintang Persada Tabanan-Bali. Widya Balina, 5(1), 41–49.
  44. Saputra, O. A., & Sudrajat, A. (2024). Analisis Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Kimia untuk Mengukur High Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Semester Genap Kelas X Berdasarkan Permodelan Rasch. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 1967–1984.
  45. Sari, E. D. K., & Mahmudi, I. (2024). Analisis pemodelan Rasch pada assessment pendidikan (analisis dengan menggunakan aplikasi Winstep). Jawa Tengah: Pena Persada Kerta Utama.
  46. Septiningrum Wahyu, A., & Fauziah, H. N. (2021). Investigasi Kebiasaan Berpikir Analitis Melalui Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Isu Sosiosaintifik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i3.156
  47. Setiawaty, Bintang Titik, Widha Sunarno, and S. S. (2019). Profil kemampuan berpikir analisis siswa sekolah menengah pertama di Surakarta. Prosiding SNPS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains), 234–238.
  48. Sugiarto, & Farid, A. (2023). Literasi Digital Sebagai Jalan Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Di Era Society 5.0. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(3), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v6i3.2603
  49. Sumintono, B, & Widhiarso, W (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan Rasch pada assessment pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata.
  50. Tipani, A., Toto, Yulisma, L. (2019). Implementasi model PjBL berbasis STEM untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa. Bio Educatio : (The Journal of Science and Biology Education), 4(2), 70–76. http://www.jurnal.unma.ac.id/index.php/BE/article/view/1700
  51. Tyas, E. H., Hamdu, G., & Haki Pranata, O. (2020). Analisis Soal Pilihan Ganda dengan Menggunakan Pemodelan RASCH untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Siswa dalam Mengurutkan Bilangan Pecahan di Sekolah Dasar. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v7i2.24773
  52. Subando, J & Wahid, N. (2022). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jawa Tengah: Lakeisha.
  53. Uno, B. H dan Koni, S. (2012). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  54. Untary, H., & Risdianto, E. (2020). Kusen, Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Model Rasch Dan Winstep. Bogor:
  55. Widiyono, A., & Millati, I. (2021). The Role of Educational Technology in the Perspective of Independent Learning in Era 4.0. Journal of Education and Teaching, 2(1), 1–9.
  56. Widodo, W., & Chotimah, C. (2023). Adaptasi dan Analisis Psikometri Skala Kompetensi Multikultural Calon Guru Menggunakan Pemodelan Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i2.4228
  57. Yarmalinda, D, & S. (2020). Biolearning Journal. Biolearning Journal, 7(1), 39–43.
  58. Yulina, I. K., Permanasari, A., Hernani, H., & Setiawan, W. (2019). Analytical thinking skill profile and perception of pre service chemistry teachers in analytical chemistry learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-6596/1157/4/042046
  59. Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1). http://103.180.95.17/index.php/jtjik/article/view/2100