Bilah Samping Artikel

Unduh
PDF (English)
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 153 Unduh : 86

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of cognitive levels of practice questions and competency test questions on the Pythagorean Theorem material in the Electronic School Book (BSE) for Mathematics for Junior High Schools/Islamic Junior High Schools Class VIII published by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology in 2022 based on the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. The revised Bloom's Taxonomy used is in the cognitive process consisting of: C1-remembering, C2-understanding, C3-applying, for Low Order Thinking Skill (LOTS), C4-analyzing, C5-evaluating, and C6-creating for High Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). This type of research is descriptive research. The data sources taken in this study were practice questions and competency test questions. The practice questions analyzed amounted to 40 questions out of 20 questions, and the competency test questions analyzed amounted to 14 questions out of 10 questions. Based on the results of the analysis for practice questions, it contains 80% LOTS questions, namely C2 questions 30% and C3 questions 50%. HOTS questions 20%, namely question C4. Questions of cognitive levels C1, C5, and C6 were not found. For Competency Test questions, it contains 85.72% LOTS questions, namely question C2 50.00% and question C3 35.72%. HOTS questions 14.28%, question C4 7.14%, question C6 7.14%. Questions C1 and C5 were not found.

Kata Kunci

Cognitive level ; mathematics grade VIII questions pythagorean theorem Tingkat kognitif matematika kelas VIII soal teorema pytagoras.

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Gayus Simarmata, Rich Hunter Simanungkalit,  Febrianto Samuel Sinabang

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Cara Mengutip
Simarmata, G., Simanungkalit, R. H., & Sinabang, FebriantoS. (2024). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal pada Buku Kemdikbudristek 2022 Materi Teorema Pythagoras. PendIPA Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.8.3.517-526
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Referensi

  1. Amelia, D., Susanto, S., & Fatahillah, A. 2016. Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Himpunan Berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Kelas VII-A di SMPN 14 Jember. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v2i1.3402
  2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. 2010. Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. (terjemahan) (1 ed.). Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar.
  3. Bagiyono. 2017. Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Sial Ujian Pelatihan Radiografi Tingkat 1. Widyanuklida, 16(No. 1), 1–12. http://repo- nkm.batan.go.id/ 140/ 1/ 05 _analisis_tingkat_kesukaran.pdf
  4. Fatonah, S. 2005. Aplikasi Aspek Kognitif (teori bloom) dalam Pembuatan Soal Kimia. Kauni, 1(2).
  5. Helmawati. 2019. Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Berbasis HOTS. ROSDA.
  6. Imanuddin, Try Fauzi Nur. 2015. Skripsi: “Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal Apersepsi Pada Buku Siswa Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VII Kurikulum 2013 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom”. Jember: Universitas Negeri Jember.
  7. Kemendikbud. 2018. Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  8. Kumalasari, Ellisia. 2009. Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Pernyataan pada Buku Teks Matematika Kelas VII Pokok Bahsan Bilangan Bulat Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Skripsi, Jember: Unversitas Jember.
  9. Kurniawan, T. 2020. Analisis Soal Buku Matematika Kelas VII Edisi Revisi 2017 pada Materi Penyajian Data Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. JP2MS.
  10. Masduki. Subandriah, M.R. Irawan, D.Y. Prihantoro, A. 2013. Level Kognitif soal-soal Pada Buku Teks Matematika SMP Kelas VII, diseminarkan pada Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UNY, ISBN : 978 – 979 – 16353 – 9 – 4.
  11. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. 2012. TIMSS 2011.pdf. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
  12. Puryati, E. 2017. Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan VI(2), 192–201.
  13. Riduwan. 2014. Pengantar Statistika Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  14. Simarmata, G. 2023. Analysis of Numeracy Ability of Class VII Students SMP Negeri 1 Siantar. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, Vol 4, No 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i1.374
  15. ------------------, Sinaga, C.V.R. Motivasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa di SMK Teladan Tanah Jawa. Jurnal Pendipa Pendidikan Sains, 2023/8/17. Volume 7, Penurunan 2, halaman 299-303.
  16. Sudjana, N. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  17. Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
  18. ------------.2019. Statistika untuk Penelitian (30 ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  19. Suharman, A & Romadhona, R. 2020. Analisis Soal-Soal Uji Kompetensi Pada Buku Teks Matematika SMA Kelas XI Peminatan IPA Semester I Berdasarkan Tingkat Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom, Jurnal Tanjak: Journal of Education and Teaching, Vol 1 No. 1.
  20. Susanto, Susanta, & Rusdi. 2020. Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Mathematics Instrument Test Based On Macromedia Flash For Junior Secondary School Students In Bengkulu City. Jurnal Ilmiah Pengembangan dan Penerapan IPTEKS. Volume 18, No 1.
  21. Tohir, M., As’ari, A.R., Anam, A.C., Taufi, I. 2022. Matematika SMP/MTS Kelas VIII. Jakarta. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.