Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the consumer's acceptance towards sweet bread substituted to Modified Talipuk Flour (MOTAF) and temulawak starch. This research was conducted using a completely randomized design method (CRD) which consisted of 5 treatments consisting of the ratio of wheat flour, motaf, and ginger starch flour. The sweet bread of these 5 treatments was tested for specific volume and level of consumer preference which consisted of taste, aroma, and texture. The data obtained were then analyzed by ANOVA and followed by further DMRT test at the 5% level. The results showed that consumers could receive sweet bread substituted for Motaf and temulawak starch which in terms of aroma and texture showed no significant difference to bread 100% wheat flour, while in terms of taste in treatment C (substitution of Motaf and Temulawak Starch Flour) has a taste similar to 100% wheat bread with a score of 6.31. Whereas for the specific volume there was a significant difference in each treatment where the bread in treatment C had a greater value than the 100% wheat bread. The addition of temulawak starch will have an effect on the bread yield, the more temulawak starch was added, the quality of the bread will decrease.

Keywords

Modified talipuk flour (motaf) temulawak starch sweet bread

Article Details

How to Cite
Sandri, D., & Lestari, E. (2020). CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE TOWARDS SWEET BREAD SUBTITUTED TO MODIFIED TALIPUK FLOUR (MOTAF) AND TEMULAWAK STARCH. Jurnal Agroindustri, 10(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.31186/j.agroindustri.10.2.139-146

References

  1. AACC. Approved Methods of Analysis,. 2011. Methods: 74-09.01 (bread firmness), 10-05.01 (bread volume). 11th edition. Minnesota (US): American Association of Cereal Chemists.
  2. BSN. 2006. SNI 01-2346 tentang Petunjuk Pengujian Organoleptik dan atau Sensori.
  3. BPS. 2020. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia, April. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002
  4. Damat, Ta’in, A., Handjani, H., Chasanah, U., Siskawardani D., 2017. Karakterisasi Roti Manis Dari Pati Garut Termodifikasi Dengan Penambahan Emulsifier Lesitin. Prosiding Seminar Nasional FKPT-TPI, 20-21 September 2017. Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara: 65-76.
  5. Fatimah, E. Lestari, & D. Sandri. 2017. Karakterisasi Tepung Biji Talipuk (Nymphaea pubescens Willd ) Termodifikasi Menggunakan Ragi Tape. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PATPI 2017, 10-12 November 2017, Bandar Lampung. 256–262.
  6. Khamidah, A., Antarlina, S. S., & Sudaryono, T. 2017. Ragam Produk Olahan Temulawak Untuk Mendukung Keanekaragaman Pangan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian, 36(1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v36n1.2017.
  7. Lestari, E., D. Sandri, Fatimah., 2019. Volume Kembang Adonan Dan Sensory Roti Manis Yang Dibuat Dari Modified Talipuk Flour (MOTAF). Jurnal Teknologi & Industri Hasil Pertanian, 24(2): 113-120. https://doi.org//10.23960/jtihp.v24i2.
  8. Lestari, E., Fatimah, D. Sandri, & Yuniarti, R. 2019. Potensi Pati Temulawak Sebagai Bahan Pangan Pengganti Tepung Terigu Pada Kue Bolu. Jurnal Ilmu Pangan Dan Hasil Pertanian, 3(1): 60- 67. https://doi.org/10.26877/jiphp.v3i1.3610
  9. Mojiono, Jailani, F., Kusumawardani, S., Puspitasari, C., Maula, A., Purwandari, U., 2012. Modifikasi fisik (annealing) tepung uwi ungu untuk roti tawar tersubstitusi dan indeks glikemiknya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional : Kedaulatan Pangan dan Energi, 12 Juni 2012. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. 313-320.
  10. Muflihati, I., et al., 2018. Sifat Fisikokimia dan Sensoris Roti Hasil Substitusi Pati Ganyong yang Dimodifikasi Melalui Irradiasi Sinar UV-C. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknosains. 4(1): 11-15.
  11. Nur’aini, A. 2011. “Aplikasi Millet (Pennisetum Spp) Merah dan MilletKuning sebagai Substitusi Terigu dalam Pembuatan Roti Tawar :Evaluasi Sifat Sensoris dan Fisikokimia”. Skripsi. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
  12. Parwiyanti, P., Pratama, F., Wijaya, A., & Malahayati, N. 2019. Karakteristik Roti Bebas Gluten Berbahan Dasar Pati Ganyong Termodifikasi. AgriTECH, 38(3): 337-334. https://doi.org/10.22146/agritech.16946
  13. Richana, Nur. 2010. Tepung jagung termodifikasi sebagai pengganti Terigu. Warta Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian 32(6): 5-7
  14. Rosidi, A., Khomsan, A., Setiawan, B., Riyadi, H., & Briawan, D. 2014. Potensi Temulawak (Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb) Sebagai Antioksidan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil-Hasil Penelitian & Pengabdian. 9 Agustus 2014, Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, Semarang.
  15. Sitepu, K. M. 2019. Penentuan Konsentrasi Ragi Pada Pembuatan Roti. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Agrokompleks, 2(1), 71–77
  16. Subagja, H.P. 2014. Temulawak Itu Ajaib! Rimpang Ajaib PembasmiBeragam Penyakit. Cetakan Pertama. Penerbit FlashBooks,Yogyakarta. 148 hlm.
  17. Sutriono, Y. dan U. Pato. 2016. Pemanfaatan buah terung belanda dan kulit pisang kepok dalam pembuatan selai. Jom Faperta. 3(2):1 -13.
  18. Yuwono, S.S., dan E. Waziiroh. 2019. Teknologi Pengolahan Tepung Terigu dan Olahannya di Industri. UB Press. Malang.