Main Article Content

Abstract

Performance assessment is the process of evaluating and assessing employee performance. This activity can improve personnel decisions and provide feedback to employees about the implementation of their works.. The purpose of this research is to apply AHP method and rating scale in assessing the performance of CPO factory operators in PT. Daria Dharma Pratama Lubuk Bento with predetermined criteria. The research method used is the questionnaire method (questionnaire), where the authors submit the questionnaire directly to the respondents and take it back. Data analysis used AHP method  to get global weight from each criteria and sub criteria and combined with rating scale which aims to assess operator's performances with scale of assessment then look for recapitulation of operator performances result from both methods. Based on the results of the research, it is found that the criteria that are the first priority in assessing operator performances are the attitude criteria and the sub criteria which becomes the first priorities are  minor care, self-safety, clothing and personal protective equipment.

Keywords: Performance assessment, AHP, rating scale

Article Details

How to Cite
Simanjuntak, R. B., Uker, D., & Zuki, M. (2019). OPERATOR PERFORMANCE ASSESMENT AT PT. DARIA DHARMA PRATAMA BY USING AHP AND RATING SCALE METHOD. Jurnal Agroindustri, 8(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.31186/j.agroindustri.8.2.159-166

References

  1. Assauri, Sofjan. 2008. Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
  2. Bacal, R. 2002. Performance Management. Terjemahan Surya Dharma, Yanuar Irawan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  3. Bandura, A. 2005. Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freemanand Company. (Online) dalam (http://skripsipsikologie.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/efikasi-diri-dankecemasan/ di akses pada 28 Februari 2013).
  4. Darmasaputra, A, Satiningsih. 2013. Hubungan antara Dukungan Sosial Teman Kerja dengan Kinerja Pegawai di Kantor Kecamatan Jombang. Jurnal Character, 01(02): 1-6.
  5. G. Dessler, G. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Kesepuluh Jilid 2. Jakarta: Index
  6. Ilyas. 2001. Teori Penilaian dan Penelitian Kinerja, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Ekonomi Kesehatan FKM-UI.
  7. Krosnick, J.A and A. Tahk. 2013. The Optimal Length of Rating Scales to Maximize Reliability and Validity. Paper Departments of Psychology and Political Science. Stanford University.
  8. Mangkunegara. 2009. Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  9. Manoharan, T. R., dan C. Muralidharan. 2012. A Composite model for employees’ Performance Appraisal and Improvement. Euroupean Journal of Training and Development, 36 (4): 448 – 480.
  10. Megginson, William. L., Byrd Mary Jane, Megginson Leon. C. (2000). Small Bussiness Management: An Entrepreneur’s Guide Book (3rd ed). United States Of America : Mc Graw-Hill.
  11. Mukti, Ayu M., Retro. A dan Shyntia P. 2012. Penilaian Kinerja Kepala Bagian Produksi dengan Metode ANP dan Rating Scale (Studi Kasus di PT. Santar Top, Tbk. Waru-Sidoarjo). Jurnal Industria, 2 (1): 47 – 56.
  12. Munir, S. 2008. Modul Statistik I (Deskriptif). Fakultas Ekonomi Pangan Program Kelas Karyawan. Universitas Mercu Buana.
  13. Nawawi, H. Hadari. 1983. Metode Penelitian Deskriptif. Gajah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta.
  14. Risza S, 2004. Kelapa Sawit Upaya Meningkatan Produktivitas. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
  15. Robbins, Stephen. P. & Timothy, A. Judge. 2009. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
  16. Saaty,TL, and L.G. Vargas. 1993. Models, Methods, Concept and aplications of The Hierarchy Process.International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Second Edition. New York. Springer
  17. Sinambela. L.P. 2012. Kinerja Pegawai. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  18. Sondang P Siagian. 2003, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia edisi satu, cetakan kesepuluh. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
  19. Sonnentag, S. 2003. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(3):518-528.
  20. Sudaryono. 2014. Budaya & Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu Cendekia.
  21. Sudaryono. 2014. Budaya & Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu Cendekia.
  22. Sugiyono. 2012. Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung : CV Alfabeta.
  23. Sumhudi, A. 1991. Komposisi Desain Riset. . Solo: Ramadhani
  24. T. Semih dan S. Seyhan. 2011. “A multi-criteria factor evaluation model for gas station site selection.” Journal of Global Management. 2(1):12-21
  25. Waryanto, B. dan Millafati. 2006. Transformasi Data Skala Ordinal ke Interval dengan Menggunakan Makro Minitab. Jurnal Informatika Pertanian. 15:881-895.
  26. Yusmardian. 2005. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Penggunaan Alat Pelindung Diri Pada Pekerja Bagian Produksi Unit Chlor Alkali PT. Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Perawang Tbk hhtp://www.google.com/litbang.go.id/2429.htm