Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

 

Journal Amplifier: scientific Journal of Technic Electric and Computer is a scientific communication media which is issued by Study Programme of Electrical Technic, Faculty of Technic, the University of Bengkulu.  p-ISSN 2089-2020 and e-ISSN 2089-2020 in a year published twice (Mei and November). 

Articles can be the results of research, scientific studies, and the analysis and solving issues relevant to the field of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, and has never been published in other scientific journals.

This topic includes parts :

  1. Signal, System and Electronics
  2. Digital Signal Processing
  3. Robotic Systems
  4. Image Processing
  5. Biomedical Instrumentation
  6. Micro Electronics
  7. Embedded Systems includes parts is Communication Systems
  8. Management and Protocol Network
  9. Telecommunication
  10. Wireless Communications
  11. Opto Electronics
  12. Fuzzy Sensor and Network

This journal collaborates with FORTEI (Forum Pendidikan Tinggi Teknik Elektro Indonesia).

 

 

 

Section Policies

Amplifier November 2018 Vol 8 no 2

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier Mei 2019 Vol 9 No 1

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier November 2019 Vol 9 no 2

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier Mei 2020 Vol 10 No 1

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier November 2020 Vol 10 No 2

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier Mei 2021 Vol 11 No 1

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier November 2021 Vol 11 no 2

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Amplifier Vol 12 N0 1 Mei 2022

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

 

PEER REVIEW POLICY

Publication of articles in Jurnal Amplifier is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer, reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Jurnal Amplifier acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers. 

Initial evaluation of manuscripts

The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Jurnal Amplifier. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.

Type of peer review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is a double-blind review

Review reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
  • Is methodologically sound
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
  • Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly references previous relevant work
  • Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

Decision

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.

Becoming a Reviewer

If you are not currently a reviewer for Jurnal Amplifier but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for Jurnal Amplifier include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in the related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for Jurnal Amplifier as part of your professional development requirements. Jurnal Amplifier reviewers are volunteers who contribute their expertise to the science, thus no financial payments are made.

 

 

Publication Frequency

Mei dan November

 

Open Access Policy

 

Jurnal Ampifier provides open access directly to content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports global exchanges that are greater than knowledge. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full text of this article, or use it for other legitimate purposes under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

 

Journal Amplifier: scientific Journal of Technic Electric and Computer is a scientific communication media which is issued by Study Programme of Electrical Technic, Faculty of Technic, the University of Bengkulu. Every article published focuses mainly on applied engineering, technology applied in society. Articles are written by authors who are competent in their fields and source from the results of the study/research. Each content of the article contains the elements of novelty, originality, and usability. To improve journal quality and professionalism of authors, editors, reviewers, and journal managers, it is then established "Ethics of Scientific Publications of JOALL". They are to avoid malpractice in publishing journals and copyright violations, such as duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. They refer to "Peraturan Kepala LIPI Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Kode Etika Publikasi Ilmiah". They are expected to be implemented by the authors, editors, reviewers, and journal managers.

AUTHOR ETHICS

Reporting; authors should report the process and results of their research fairly, clearly, precisely, accurately, thoroughly, and impartially as well as save the data well. Honesty is expected in presenting any data and information listed in content and research results.
Originality; authors make a statement that the paper submitted to the journal editor is original (from the author's own ideas), has never been delivered and published in any media, in any language, and not in the process of submission to another publisher. The case of publication duplication and deception, the article is subject to be removed from this journal.
Clear sources; authors should mention and ensure that any reading materials used as citations and bibliography are written clearly and completely. Authors are strictly forbidden to quote the writings of others without citing the original source.
Responsibility; authors are fully responsible for the data and research writings, in terms of methods, analysis, calculation, and details. If verification is required from editors and reviewers, the authors are willing to answer it clearly, precisely and fairly.
Agreement; authors ensure that the names listed in the article are based on contributions of ideas and thoughts every writer and have been approved by the entire team of writers. Any changes, reductions or additions of author names, should be approved the team of writers. Any other parties contributing fully ( non-substance ) in writing this paper, the authors express their gratitude to the relevant parties.
Punctuality; authors revise the script and edit texts punctually for the sake of discipline and regular journal publication. Otherwise, the authors are ready to take the consequences, which is the delay of journal article publication.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; authors uphold copyright and privacy of one another to avoid conflicts of interest. In the event of a conflict of interest with other parties, the authors must solve it justly and wisely.
EDITOR ETHICS

Neutrality; the editor is neutral in selecting and screening manuscript. The editor must be objective and fair to all writers who submitted their written works. The editor is forbidden to be discriminative to the authors in terms of gender, ethnicity, religion, race, intergroup, or nationality.
Reporting; editor reports the selection and reviews scripts clearly and accurately to the author based on accuracy, completeness, and clarity of reporting of result research and its development, including editing techniques and the use of guidelines for publication and screenwriting.
Communicative; editor communicates effectively and efficiently in the process of publishing the journal. Every suggestion and criticism from authors, reviewers, and journal managers should be addressed clearly, fairly and transparently.
Fairness; editor distributes scripts to editor team members and reviewers fairly based on their respective competence.
Professional; editor works professionally based on his duties and responsibilities. The editor should understand any policy related to journal publication. Editor ensures that every script has undergone the editorial process and review correctly, fairly, and objectively.
Responsibility; editor takes full responsibility for the success of journal publication. Editor guarantees that every journal article published is a new paper and not a copy, and gives benefits to those reading and accessing the journals.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; editor upholds copyright and privacy of each other to avoid conflict of interest. Should a conflict of interest arise with other parties, an editor must solve it justly and wisely.
REVIEWER ETHICS

Neutrality; reviewer is fair, objective, unbiased, independent, and only in favor of scientific truth. The script review process is carried out professionally without distinguishing the writer’s background. The reviewer is prohibited conduct a review of papers involving himself, either directly or indirectly.
Professional; reviewer should be critical and professional in assessing a paper (related to his expertise), open about new things, able to keep the secret of the things being assessed, does not take personal advantage of the paper he assesses, as well as has a passion for improving written works. The reviewer has the right to refuse a script if it does not correspond to his expertise. He then can recommend it to the other more competent reviewers in accordance with the scope of publication.
Quality assurance; reviewer has a duty to assist editors in improving the quality of paper he reviews. Reviewer analyzes papers on the substance not on grammar, punctuation, and typos. The reviewer is required to uphold the basic principles and scientific analysis in the process of reviewing a paper. Reviewer works on the principle of truth, novelty, and originality; prioritizes benefit of the paper for the development of science, technology, and innovation; as well as understands the impact of paper on the development of science.
Punctuality; reviewer reviews the script and gives a response to the editor quickly, expected to be on time. If the time is not enough, the reviewer then informs the editor with a clear reason for the sake of discipline and regularity of journal publication.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; reviewer upholds copyright and privacy of each other in order to avoid conflicts of interest. Should a conflict of interest arise with other parties, the reviewer must finish it justly and wisely.
JOURNAL MANAGEMENT ETHICS

Decision-making; journal managers should define the vision, mission, and goals of the organization in journal publication based on the recommendation of reviewers and the editorial board. To do so, journal managers are neutral and free from conflicts of interest of individuals or groups, business aspects, aspects of ethnicity, religion, race, and intergroup.
Freedom; journal managers give freedom to the reviewer and editor to create harmony at working atmosphere and mutual respect for one another in order to guarantee and protect intellectual property rights, particularly those related to the management of funds received from third parties. Journal managers encourage editors and reviewers to apply the ethics clearance including confidentiality, licensing, and special requirements in research on humans, animals, and other living creatures.
Responsibility; journal managers are responsible for the guideline of journal publication policies, starting from the name of an issue, scientific scope, script writing style, collaboration, licensing and legal publications, and evaluation of script publication.
Promotion; journal managers promote and ensure the sustainability of journal publication. Journal managers are entitled to determine the funding in accordance with the policies and needs of journal publication. In its management, funders do not intervene in terms of issue substance. Source of research and development fund is included in the publication without affecting the reader's perception.
Disclosure of conflicts of interest; journal managers uphold copyright and privacy of each other to avoid conflicts of interest. In the event of the conflict of interest with other parties, journal managers must finish it justly and wisely.
Further information on ethics of scientific publication, please access Committee On Publication Ethics (COPE) site.

 

 

Subscribe Policy

Sosdict : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat is an open access journal so that it is free of charge for readers, writers, and anyone accessing full-text articles in this journal site [see Open Access Policy]

 

Indexing and Abstracting

 

Sosdict : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat has been indexed and abstracted in

Google Scholar
Garba Rujukan Digital (GARUDA)
Crossref (USA)
WorldCat (World Catalog, Canada)
Indonesia One Search (IOS, Perpusnas RI)
Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE, Germany)
ROAD (Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources)
International Journal Impact Factor (IJI)
Index Copernicus International (ICI, Poland)
Harvard Library
The University of Sheffield