SINTA ID: 
Reviewer
About Journal
Focus and Scope
Journal Amplifier: scientific Journal of Technic Electric and Computer is a scientific communication media which is issued by Study Programme of Electrical Technic, Faculty of Technic, the University of Bengkulu. p-ISSN 2089-2020 and e-ISSN 2089-2020 in a year published twice (Mei and November).
Articles can be the results of research, scientific studies, and the analysis and solving issues relevant to the field of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, and has never been published in other scientific journals.
This topic includes parts :
Signal, System and Electronics
Digital Signal Processing
Robotic Systems
Image Processing
Biomedical Instrumentation
Micro Electronics
Teknik Tenaga Listrik
Embedded Systems includes parts is Communication Systems
Management and Protocol Network
Telecommunication
Wireless Communications
Opto Electronics
Fuzzy Sensor and Network
This journal collaborates with FORTEI (Forum Pendidikan Tinggi Teknik Elektro Indonesia).
Peer Review Process
PEER REVIEW POLICY
Publication of articles in Jurnal Amplifier is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer, reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Jurnal Amplifier acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers.
Initial evaluation of manuscripts
The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Jurnal Amplifier. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.
Type of peer review
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is a double-blind review
Review reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
Is methodologically sound
Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
Correctly references previous relevant work
Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.
Decision
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.
Becoming a Reviewer
If you are not currently a reviewer for Jurnal Amplifier but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for Jurnal Amplifier include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in the related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for Jurnal Amplifier as part of your professional development requirements. Jurnal Amplifier reviewers are volunteers who contribute their expertise to the science, thus no financial payments are made.
Publication Frequency
Mei dan November
Open Access Policy
Jurnal Ampifier provides open access directly to content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports global exchanges that are greater than knowledge. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, link to the full text of this article, or use it for other legitimate purposes under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sponsors
UNIB Press, Univeristas Bengkulu