Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

1. Animal Production

2. Nutrition and Feedstuffs Technology

3. Animal Science Sosial Economy

4. Animal Science Technology

5. Genetic and Breeding

6. Animal Science Reproduction

7. Animal Science By-product Technology

8. Fodder Forages

9. Potential Animal Science/Endangered Animals

10. Animal Science Veterinary

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Front Matter

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Back Matter

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Reviewers must evaluate a manuscript solely on academic merit, in which case if a conflict of interest is detected, it must be notified to the editor immediately. The reviewer must retain all information relating to the manuscript being reviewed. Reviewers should review the manuscript objectively. The reviewer must be clear about any vague statements written by the author. Reviewers may not review manuscripts that have a conflict of interest resulting from competition or association with any author. If plagiarism is detected, the reviewer must notify the editor immediately.

Publication Frequency

May dan November

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

PART I: Publications All submitted manuscripts will be reviewed by at least two reviewers who have expertise in the field. Originality, soundness, novelty and language are factors considered in reviews by reviewers. The results of the review are categorized as eligible for publication in the Tropical Livestock Bulletin without revision, eligible for publication in BPT with minor revisions, eligible for publication in BPT with major revisions, and rejected. If the author revises and resubmits the manuscript, there is no guarantee that the revised manuscript will be accepted. Rejected manuscripts will not be reviewed.

PART II: Editors Editors have full responsibility and authority to reject / accept manuscripts. Editors must guarantee the quality of papers published in Bulletin of Tropical Animal Science. The editor must provide all the information needed by the author to improve the quality of the publication. Editors must maintain the identity or anonymity of the reviewer. The editor must publish errata pages when necessary. Editors must not allow conflicts of interest to exist between authors, reviewers, and board members.

PART III: Authors Authors must state that the manuscript has not been previously published or is not being considered for publication elsewhere. The author must state that the submitted manuscript is free from plagiarism. The author certifies that the experiments were carried out in accordance with national, international or applicable regulations for conducting scientific research. Authors must follow the BPT guidelines. The author states that all data analyzed is real.

PART IV: Reviewers Reviewers must evaluate a manuscript solely on academic merit, in which case if a conflict of interest is detected, it must be notified to the editor immediately. The reviewer must retain all information relating to the manuscript being reviewed. Reviewers should review the manuscript objectively. The reviewer must be clear about any vague statements written by the author. Reviewers may not review manuscripts that have a conflict of interest resulting from competition or association with any author. If plagiarism is detected, the reviewer must notify the editor immediately.

Copyright Notice

When submitting an article to be published in Buletin Peternakan tropis, the author must make a statement that the work is original and has never been published or is not being considered for publication in another journal. The author also provides a statement of transfer of manuscript copyright to Buletin Peternakan Tropis if and when the article is accepted for publication.

Disclaimer

Opinions, ideas or views published in the Buletin Peternakan tropis are not the opinions or views of the journal, publisher, editor or editorial staff. The author has legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the scientific work. Issuer has no liability in relation to claims. Publisher will not be held legally responsible if there is a claim for compensation.