Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the growth performance of Red-Combed Kedu (RCK), Black-Combed Kedu (BCK), and White Kedu (WK) chickens based on sex during the early growth phase (0 to 10 weeks of age). A total of 136 Kedu chickens were raised under uniform management conditions, consisting of 99 RCK (65 roosters and 34 hens), 29 BCK (5 roosters and 24 hens), and 8 WK (6 roosters and two hens). Body weight was recorded weekly and analysed using a two-way General Linear Model (GLM) in SAS to assess the effects of chicken variety, sex, and their interaction. The Shapiro–Wilk test confirmed that the data were normally distributed (p > 0.05). The results showed that sex had a significant effect on body weight from weeks 3 to 10 (p < 0.05), with roosters consistently exhibiting higher weights than hens. Significant differences among chicken varieties were observed only in the hen group at weeks 9 and 10, where BCK hens had higher body weights (p < 0.05) than WK hens, while RCK hens showed intermediate values. In contrast, no significant differences were found among rooster groups at any age. These findings suggest that genetic factors play an essential role in influencing growth performance in Kedu chickens, particularly in hens. This information provides a valuable foundation for breeding selection and the conservation of local chicken genetic resources.

Keywords

Kedu chickens body weight growth performance breeding selection

Article Details

How to Cite
Akramullah, M. ., Kurnianto, E., Lestari, D. A., Setiatin, E. T., & Setiaji, A. (2025). Sex-Based Growth Performance of Three Varieties of Kedu Chicken Aged 0–10 Weeks. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 20(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.20.3.123-127

References

  1. Arifin, M., Lestari, V. S., & Isnaini, N. (2017). Pertumbuhan ayam kampung super pada fase grower. Jurnal Ilmu Produksi dan Teknologi Hasil Peternakan, 5(2), 58–63.
  2. Avrilliani, P., Wiyanto, E., Erina, S., & Depison, D. (2024). Correlation Between Body Weight and Carcass Weight in the Selection of Village Chicken Three-Generation. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 19(2), 78-83.
  3. Gunawan, A. A., & Fajrihati, R. (2017). Evaluasi performa pertumbuhan ayam kampung berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan pemeliharaan. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner, 22(2), 105–112.
  4. Gunawan, A. A., Purbowati, E., & Haryanto, B. (2018). Pengaruh variasi genetik terhadap performa ayam lokal Indonesia. Media Peternakan Indonesia, 41(3), 149–157.
  5. Hastuti, R. A., Wahyuni, S., & Supriyati. (2021). Evaluasi pertumbuhan ayam kampung berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan pakan. Jurnal Peternakan Nusantara, 14(2), 89–97.
  6. Prasetyo, H., Widodo, E., & Cahyono, B. (2020). Pengaruh ukuran populasi terhadap akurasi analisis statistik dalam penelitian unggas. Jurnal Statistika Terapan, 8(1), 33–41.
  7. Purwantini, D., et al. (2020). Karakteristik ayam Kedu sebagai plasma nutfah unggas lokal Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak Tropika, 9(2), 123–132.
  8. Sari, K. A., Susilowati, T., & Sutopo, B. (2020). Pengaruh hormon terhadap perbedaan pertumbuhan ayam jantan dan betina. Jurnal Biologi Tumbuhan dan Hewan, 5(2), 45–52.
  9. Suprijatna, E., Sutama, I. K., & Komariah, K. (2016). Ilmu Ternak Unggas. Bogor: IPB Press.
  10. Susilowati, T., Sutopo, B., & Cahyadi, M. (2022). Performa ayam lokal berdasarkan variasi warna bulu dan suhu lingkungan. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia, 24(1), 15–23.
  11. Sutopo, B., Susilowati, T., & Cahyadi, M. (2022). Keragaman genetik ayam lokal Indonesia: Potensi dan tantangan. Indonesian Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 6(2), 45–54.