Evaluation of Native Rooster Based on Breeding Value of trait of Macroscopic and Microscopic Semen Quality

Sutiyono Sutiyono(1), E. Kurnianto(2), Sutopo Sutopo(3), D. K. Ariyanto(4), D. Samsudewa(5),
(1) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(2) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(3) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(4) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
(5) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia


The aim of this research is to a determined the breeding value of native roosters based on macroscopic and microscopic semen. Ten native roosters were used in this research. Complete individual cage, semen collection tools and substance, macroscopic and microscopic tools, and substance were used in this research. The native rooster was rested for 2 weeks. Massage techniques were used for semen collection. Parameters observed were volume, pH, color, viscosity, smell, sperm concentration, and sperm livability. The semen collection was repeated 5 times. One-way analysis of variances was used for data analysis with the tools SPSS 16. The breeding value was estimated based on primary traits of semen and calculated for each rooster to make a rank. The results showed that significant parameters (P<0,05) are semen volume and sperm concentration, while the non-significant parameters (P?0,05) are pH semen and sperm livability. Semen color is yellowish-white, semen viscosity is medium-viscous and smell is spermin. The results of breeding value rank are rooster numbers 6, 7, 5, 3, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, and 1. The conclusion is the breeding value of Native roosters is varied. The recommendation is Native chicken breeding need to apply selection used breeding value based on semen quality.


Native rooster evaluation; breeding value; semen quality

Full Text:



Junaedi, R. I. Arifiantini, C. Sumantri and A. Gunawan. 2016. Use of glycerol as cryoprotectants in freezing Sentul chicken. CJAH 1 (2): 7-13. URL: http://usnsj.com/ index.php/CJAH/article/view/CJAH002.

Lubis, T. M. 2011. Motilitas spermatozoa ayam kampung dalam pengencer air kelapa, Na Cl fisiologis dan air kelapa-NaCl fisiologis pada 25-29oC. Agripet 11 (2): 45-50, URL: http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/agripet/article/viewFile/374/359.

Malik, A., A. W. Haron, R. Yussof, M. Nesa, M. Bukar and A. Kasim. 2013. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 37: 564-568. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1107-26.

Mavi, G.K., P. P. Dubey, S. C. Ranjna, S. K. Dash and B, K, Bansal. 2019. Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research 53 (10): 1269-1274. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646.

Mohammadifar, A. and M.R. Mohammadabadi. 2017.The effect of uncopling protein polymorphisms on growth, breeding value of growth and reproductivo traits in the Fars indigenous chicken. IJAS 7 (4): 679-685. URL: http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_535799 .html.

Rajkumar, U., L. L. L. Prince, K. S. Rajaravindra, S. Haunshi, M. Niranjan and R. N. Chatterjee. 2021. Analysis of (co) variance components and estimation of breeding value of growth and production traits in Dahlem Red chicken using pedigree relationship in an animal model. PloS ONE 16 (3): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0247779.

Roushdy, Kh., M. A. El-Sherbieny, F. A. Abd. El Gany and M. A. El-Sayed. 2014. Semen cryopreservation for two local chicken strains as a tool for conservation of Egyyptian local genetic resources. EPSA 34 (II): 607-618. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/277308492_Semen_cryopreservation_for_two_local_chicken_Strains_as_a_tool_for_conservation_of_Egyptian_local_genetic_resources

Usman, T. H., S. M. Sir, S. Halu and A. Kari. 2021. Assesment of semen characteristics among three phenptypes of chicken raised in Akko, Gombe state of Nigeria. Jornal of Agrobiotechnology 12 (1): 40-48.. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37231/jab.2021.12.1.242.

Wiyanti, D. C., N. Isnaini and P. Trisunuwati. 2013. Effect of semen storage added with physiological saline diluter in room temperature on the quality of native chicken (gallus domesticus) spermatozoa. J. Kedokt. Hewan 7 (1): 53-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21157/ j.ked.hewan.v7i1.566.

Zen, A. A., Y. S. Ondho dan Sutiyono. 2020. Seleksi pejantan ayam kampung berdasarkan breeding value terhadap gerak massa, abnormalitas dan motilitas spermatozoa. JSPI 15 (3): 339-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.15.3.339-347.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.16.3.228-232

Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 0 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Editorial Office :

Gedung Laboratorium Jurusan Peternakan Lantai 2, Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Bengkulu

Jalan W.R. Supratman, Kandang Limun, Bengkulu, 38371

Email : jspi@unib.ac.id, jsainpet@gmail.com