Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this research is to a determined the breeding value of native roosters based on macroscopic and microscopic semen. Ten native roosters were used in this research. Complete individual cage, semen collection tools and substance, macroscopic and microscopic tools, and substance were used in this research. The native rooster was rested for 2 weeks. Massage techniques were used for semen collection. Parameters observed were volume, pH, color, viscosity, smell, sperm concentration, and sperm livability. The semen collection was repeated 5 times. One-way analysis of variances was used for data analysis with the tools SPSS 16. The breeding value was estimated based on primary traits of semen and calculated for each rooster to make a rank. The results showed that significant parameters (P<0,05) are semen volume and sperm concentration, while the non-significant parameters (P?0,05) are pH semen and sperm livability. Semen color is yellowish-white, semen viscosity is medium-viscous and smell is spermin. The results of breeding value rank are rooster numbers 6, 7, 5, 3, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, and 1. The conclusion is the breeding value of Native roosters is varied. The recommendation is Native chicken breeding need to apply selection used breeding value based on semen quality.

Keywords

Native rooster evaluation breeding value semen quality

Article Details

Author Biographies

Sutiyono Sutiyono, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Professor, Animal Science

E. Kurnianto, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Professor, Animal Science

Sutopo Sutopo, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Asst. Professor, Animal Science

D. K. Ariyanto, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Student, Animal Science

D. Samsudewa, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Asst. Profesor, Animal Science
How to Cite
Sutiyono, S., Kurnianto, E., Sutopo, S., Ariyanto, D. K., & Samsudewa, D. (2021). Evaluation of Native Rooster Based on Breeding Value of trait of Macroscopic and Microscopic Semen Quality. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 16(3), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.16.3.228-232

References

  1. Junaedi, R. I. Arifiantini, C. Sumantri and A. Gunawan. 2016. Use of glycerol as cryoprotectants in freezing Sentul chicken. CJAH 1 (2): 7-13. URL: http://usnsj.com/ index.php/CJAH/article/view/CJAH002.
  2. Lubis, T. M. 2011. Motilitas spermatozoa ayam kampung dalam pengencer air kelapa, Na Cl fisiologis dan air kelapa-NaCl fisiologis pada 25-29oC. Agripet 11 (2): 45-50, URL: http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/agripet/article/viewFile/374/359.
  3. Malik, A., A. W. Haron, R. Yussof, M. Nesa, M. Bukar and A. Kasim. 2013. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 37: 564-568. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1107-26.
  4. Mavi, G.K., P. P. Dubey, S. C. Ranjna, S. K. Dash and B, K, Bansal. 2019. Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research 53 (10): 1269-1274. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646.
  5. Mohammadifar, A. and M.R. Mohammadabadi. 2017.The effect of uncopling protein polymorphisms on growth, breeding value of growth and reproductivo traits in the Fars indigenous chicken. IJAS 7 (4): 679-685. URL: http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_535799 .html.
  6. Rajkumar, U., L. L. L. Prince, K. S. Rajaravindra, S. Haunshi, M. Niranjan and R. N. Chatterjee. 2021. Analysis of (co) variance components and estimation of breeding value of growth and production traits in Dahlem Red chicken using pedigree relationship in an animal model. PloS ONE 16 (3): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0247779.
  7. Roushdy, Kh., M. A. El-Sherbieny, F. A. Abd. El Gany and M. A. El-Sayed. 2014. Semen cryopreservation for two local chicken strains as a tool for conservation of Egyyptian local genetic resources. EPSA 34 (II): 607-618. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/277308492_Semen_cryopreservation_for_two_local_chicken_Strains_as_a_tool_for_conservation_of_Egyptian_local_genetic_resources
  8. Usman, T. H., S. M. Sir, S. Halu and A. Kari. 2021. Assesment of semen characteristics among three phenptypes of chicken raised in Akko, Gombe state of Nigeria. Jornal of Agrobiotechnology 12 (1): 40-48.. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37231/jab.2021.12.1.242.
  9. Wiyanti, D. C., N. Isnaini and P. Trisunuwati. 2013. Effect of semen storage added with physiological saline diluter in room temperature on the quality of native chicken (gallus domesticus) spermatozoa. J. Kedokt. Hewan 7 (1): 53-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21157/ j.ked.hewan.v7i1.566.
  10. Zen, A. A., Y. S. Ondho dan Sutiyono. 2020. Seleksi pejantan ayam kampung berdasarkan breeding value terhadap gerak massa, abnormalitas dan motilitas spermatozoa. JSPI 15 (3): 339-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.15.3.339-347.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>