Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this research is to measure effect of hen body weight to the growth rate of native chicken. Ten native hens divided by two classifications (heavy and light body weight), 2 native roosters, 58 (from hen with heavy body weight) and 62 (from hen with light body weight) female day old chicks (DoC) use in this research. Hatching machine, communal cage, feeder tray, drinking jar, balance body weight and vernier calliper, were use in this research. Body weight and morphometric of female native chicken from DoC up to 10 week was measured. T-test analysis was used with help of SPSS 25. The results showed that the hen with heavy body weight resulted to the higher morphometric and body weight of female native chicken (P<0.05) on 7 and 8 week, respectively. The growth rate gain of female native chicken hatched by the hen with heavy body weight is significantly difference (P<0.05) on body weight.  The conclusion is the hen with heavy body weight will result to the higher body weight and morphometric of female native chicken.

Keywords

Growth evaluation native chicken different type of hen body weight

Article Details

Author Biographies

Sutopo Sutopo, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

E. Kurnianto, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

Sutiyono Sutiyono, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

E. T. Setiatin, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

Y. S. Ondho, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

D. A. Lestari, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

A. Setiaji, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer

A. Suryawijaya, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Laboran

D. Samsudewa, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Universitas Diponegoro

Lecturer
How to Cite
Sutopo, S., Kurnianto, E., Sutiyono, S., Setiatin, E. T., Ondho, Y. S., Lestari, D. A., Setiaji, A., Suryawijaya, A., & Samsudewa, D. (2021). Growth Evaluation of Native Chicken on Different Type of Hen Body Weight. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 16(4), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.16.4.292-296

References

  1. Faruque, S., M. S. Islam, M. A. Afroz and M. M. Rahman. 2013. Evaluation of the performance of native chicken and estimation of heritability for body weight. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences 37(1): 93-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v37i1 .15685.
  2. Gultom, L. H. M., G. Gushairiyanto and D. Depison. 2021. Correlation of Sentul chicken body weight at DoC age of 1, 2 and 3 months. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia 16 (3): 273-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.16.3.273-276.
  3. Guni F. S., A. M. Katule and P. A. A. Mwakilembe. 2013. Characterization of local chickens in selected districts of the Southern Highlands of Tanzania: II. Production and Morphometric traits. Livestock Research for Rural Development 25: Article 190. URL: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/11/guni25190.htm.
  4. Izadnia, H. R., M. Tahmoorespur, M. R. Bakhtiarizadeh, M. Nassiri and S. Esmaeilkhanien. 2019. Gene expression profile analysis of residual feed intake for Isfahan native chickens using RNA-SEQ data. Italian Journal of Animal Science 18 (1): 246-260. DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2018.1507625.
  5. Lestari, L., M. Maskur, R. Jan, T. Rozi, L. M. Kasip and M. Muhsinin. 2020. Studi karakteristik sifat kualitatif dan morfometrik induk ayam kampung dengan berbagai tipe jengger di pulau lombok. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Indonesia 6 (1): 24-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jitpi.v5i2.64.
  6. Malik, A., A. W. Haron, R. Yussof, M. Nesa, M. Bukar and A. Kasim. 2013. Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 37: 564-568. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1107-26.
  7. Mavi, G.K., P. P. Dubey, S. C. Ranjna, S. K. Dash and B, K, Bansal. 2019. Comparative analysis of semen quality parameters and their relationship with fertility in different genetic groups of layer chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Research 53 (10): 1269-1274. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3646.
  8. Mohammadifar, A. and M.R. Mohammadabadi. 2017. The effect of uncopling protein polymorphisms on growth, breeding value of growth and reproductivo traits in the Fars indigenous chicken. IJAS 7 (4): 679-685. URL: http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_535799 .html.
  9. Rahayu, B. W. I., A. E. Widodo and R. Saronggalo. 2010. Penampilan pertumbuhan ayam persilangan Kampung dan Bangkok. Jurnal Ilmu Peternakan 5 (2): 77-81. URL: 01 Jurnal Artikel.pdf (unipa.ac.id).
  10. Rajkumar, U., L. L. L. Prince, K. S. Rajaravindra, S. Haunshi, M. Niranjan and R. N. Chatterjee. 2021. Analysis of (co) variance components and estimation of breeding value of growth and production traits in Dahlem Red chicken using pedigree relationship in an animal model. PloS ONE 16 (3): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0247779.
  11. Sutiyono, E. Kurnianto, Sutopo, D. K. Ariyanto and D. Samsudewa. 2021. Evaluation of native rooster based on breeding value of trait of macroscopic and microscopic semen quality. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 16(3): 228-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id. 16.3.228-232.
  12. Tan, J., S. Liu, Y. Guo, T. J. Applegate and S. D. Eicher. 2014. Dietary L-arginine supplementation attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr. 111: 1394–1404. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513003863.
  13. Urfa, S., H. Indrijani and W. Tanwiriah. 2017. Growth curve model of kampung unggul balitnak (KUB) chicken. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak 17(1): 59-66. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.24198/jit.v17i1.14863.
  14. Wu, G., F. W. Bazer, T. A. Cudd, C. J. Meininger and T. E. Spencer. 2004. Maternal nutrition and fetal development. J. Nutr. 134: 2169–2172. DOI: 10.1093/jn/134.9.2169.
  15. Zen, A. A., Y. S. Ondho dan Sutiyono. 2020. Seleksi pejantan ayam kampung berdasarkan breeding value terhadap gerak massa, abnormalitas dan motilitas spermatozoa. JSPI 15 (3): 339-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.15.3.339-347.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>