Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aimed to examine the effect of Terminalia catappa extract in drinking water on Crossbred-native chicken's performance and carcass production. The research was arranged in a completely randomized design with five treatments and 5 replications (8 birds each). The samples in the present study were two hundred crossbred native chickens with an average body weight of 120.58±12.60 g. The treatments were as follows: drinking water without Terminalia catappa extract (T0); Drinking water with 1% of fresh Terminalia catappa leaf extract ten ml/1 l water (T1); Drinking water with 2% of fresh Terminalia catappa leaf extract 20 ml/1 l water (T2); Drinking water with 3% of fresh Terminalia catappa leaf extract 30 ml/1 l water (T3); Drinking water with 4% of fresh Terminalia catappa leaf extract 40 ml/1 l water (T4). Parameters observed were drinking water consumption, feed consumption, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and carcass production. Results show that Terminalia catappa extract in drinking water significantly affects drinking water consumption but has no effect on other parameters. Fresh Terminalia catappa leaf extract can be used in drinking water until 4%.

Keywords

Terminalia catappa Crossbred Native Chicken Performance Carcass Production

Article Details

Author Biographies

B. Marifah, Fakultas Peternakan dan Pertanian, Universitas Diponegoro

Animal Science Department

E. Suprijatna, Fakultas Peternakan dan Pertanian, Universitas Diponegoro

Animal Science Department
How to Cite
Marifah, B., Suprijatna, E., Mahfudz, L. D., Sunarti, D., Kismiati, S., Sarjana, T. A., & Muryani, R. (2022). Effect of Terminalia catappa Leaf Extract in Drinking Water on Performance and Carcass Production of Crossbred Native Chicken. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia, 17(2), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.31186/jspi.id.17.2.87-90

References

  1. Abdullah, A. Y., N.A. Al-Beitawi, M.M. Rjoup. R.I. Qudsieh and M.A.A. Ishmais. 2010. Gowth performance carcass and meat quality characteristics of different commercial crosses of broiler strains of chicken. The Journal of Poultry Science. 18 (4) : 174 – 180. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.009021
  2. Amata, I. A. 2011. Comparative evaluation of the nutrient profile of four selected browse plants in the tropics, recommended for use as non-conventional livestock feeding materials. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10 (64) : 14.230-14.233. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJBII.2488
  3. Chikumba, N. and M. Chimonyo. 2014. Effects of water restriction on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and organ weights of naked neck and ovambo chickens of southern africa. Asian Australas J. Anim. Sci. 27 (7) : 974-980. https://doi.org/10.5713%2Fajas.2013.13383
  4. Chanda, S., dan K.R. Rakholiya. 2011. Combination therapy: Synergism between natural plant extracts and antibiotics againt infectious diseases. Science againts microbial pathogens: communicating current research and technological advances. Januari 2011: 529-529. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268064090
  5. Darmawan, I., E. Suprijatna., dan U, Atmomarsono. 2017. Pengaruh frekuensi dan periode pemberian pakan terhadap produksi karkas ayam buras super. Jurnal Peternakan Indonesia 19 (01) : 10-15. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpi.19.1.10-15.2017
  6. Gunawan dan D.T.H. Sihombing. 2004. Pengaruh suhu lingkungan tinggi terhadap kondisi fisiologis dan produktivitas ayam buras. Wartozoa 14 (1): 31-38.
  7. Iskandar, S. 2005. Pertumbuhan dan perkembangan karkas ayam silangan kedu dan arab pada dua sistem pemberian ransum. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 10 (4) : 253-260.
  8. Iskandar, S., P. Handayani, dan D. Sudrajat. 2001. retensi energi dan nitrogen dan laju pencernaan pada ayam silangan pelung x kampung pada pola pemberian ransum dengan protein berbeda. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner 597-605.
  9. Munira, S., L.O. Nafiu, A.M. Tasse. 2016. Performans ayam kampung super pada pakan yang disubstitusi dedak padi fermentasi dengan fermentor berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Tropis 3 (2) : 21-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.33772/jitro.v3i2.1683
  10. Nugraha, B. A., R. Afnan , S. Darwati, and T. Suryati. 2016. Stress indicator, carcass composition, and meat cholesterol of kampung-broiler crossbred chicken treated by different stocking density. Animal Production 18 (3): 149-156.
  11. Nuningtyas, Y.F. 2014. Pengaruh penambahan tepung bawang putih (allium sativum) sebagai aditif terhadap penampilan produksi ayam pedaging. J. Ternak Tropika 15(1): 21-30.
  12. Ouyang, K., M. Xu, Y. Jiang and W. Wang. 2016. Effect Of Alfalfa flavonids on broiler performance, meat quality and gene expression. J. Anim. Sci. 96 (3) : 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2015-0132
  13. Pakaya, S. A., S. Zainudin, dan S. Dako. 2019. Performa ayam kampung super yang di beri level penambahan tepung kulit kakao (Theobroma cacao, L.) Fermentasi dalam ransum. Jambura Journal of Animal Science 1 (2) : 40-45.
  14. Pasaribu, T. 2019. The opportunities of plant bioactive compound as an alternative of antibiotic feed additive on chicken. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian 38 (2) : 96-104.
  15. Rahayu, S., D. Kusrini, Devi, dan Fachriyah. 2009. Penentuan Aktivitas Antioksidan dari Ekstrak Etanol Daun Terminalia catappa dengan Metode 1,1 Difenil-2-pikrilhidrazil (DPPH). Tugas Akhir S1 Jurusan Kimia FMIPA Undip, Jurusan Kimia, UNDIP.
  16. Samsudin, M., W. Sarengat, dan M. H. Nasoetion. 2012. Pengaruh perbedaan lama periode (starter-finisher) pemberian pakan dan level protein terhadap nisbah daging tulang dan massa protein daging dada dan paha ayam pelung umur 1 minggu sampai 11 minggu. Animal Agricultural Journal 1 (1) : 43-51. http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/aaj
  17. Widyaratne, G.P. dan M.D. Drew. 2011. Effect of protein level and digestibility on the growth and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 90: 595-603. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01098

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >>